For decades Diane Ravitch was a tremendous supporter and proponent of school reform, advocating for government and privatized educational reforms such as America 2000, No Child Left Behind (NCLB), accountability, and charter schools. The ideas of reconstructing and reorganizing the public school system seemed like it was too good to be true; and Ravitch realized that this vision was in fact just that. Through Ravitch’s experiences, she has been exposed to the truth of the reforms that took place from the 1960’s to present day and just how damaging these attempts at improving the system can really be. As a result of these findings, Diane Ravitch raises the subject of just how the American education system is progressively failing its students…
Overall I found this book very interesting. It covered a vast majority of topics and was very eye-opening on a lot of issues. Most of these issues happened in the past, but they clearly have affected education throughout the years and will affect education in the future. Many topics are controversial and it is very important to be educated on these so that as educators we can deal with them as they arise. This book did a wonderful job with addressing a lot of those issues, and made myself question if the world could ever go back to the segregated ways it once was.…
Parents around the world want their children to have the best quality education and life. However, the quality of education between low income students and wealthy students is noticeable from the structure of their schools to the classes offered. Whether we blame the school system for lack of success of students or the living circumstances of the students’ family, we must admit there is a gap of success among impoverish students and affluent students. Diane Ravitch and Jonathan Kozol are both educators that have dedicated their lives’ work to fight and change the quality of education for minorities. When it comes to the topic of the achievement gap, Kozol’s argument in Still Separate, Still Unequal, was that schools across the United States continue to be segregated especially in urban areas where students lacking resources are causing low performance scores.…
I stand before you today to discuss the overuse of standardized testing. Children of these upcoming generations have it engrained in their minds that it is imperative that they prepare themselves for a schooling system with multitudes of tests. Children in these schooling systems are required by law to take standardized tests to represent their currents school. While this is seems beneficial to be funding; parents are not able to perceive how the school and teachers are attempting to construct this into the children’s schedules. Teachers are not only piling on the word for the kids preparing for these tests, but are also forcing all of this knowledge that in a short period of time onto these students.…
If the public education system is going to work for all children, changes need to take place with less focus on standardized testing and inclusion, and provide more focus on building a solid foundation, establishing programs which address the learning style and academic level of placement necessary for the student to comprehend and acquire an appropriate education in reading, writing and arithmetic. This would be a great step forward in correcting the American education system. One size fits all mentality needs to…
Some people believe that standardized testing in America has a very positive impact on a student’s education and performance, however, others believe that standardized testing causes “important but untested content to be eliminated from the curriculum” (Popham). In discussions of standardized testing, one controversial issue has been whether high-stakes testing improves or diminishes student learning in a classroom. On one side of the argument, Latasha Gandy argues that children “can and must take the tests so we know if they’re mastering the critical skills they are learning from great teachers and great classes, skills they’ll need to pursue the college and career of their dreams”. While, on the other hand, Robert Schaefer of the National…
She states that standardized testing resulted from the No child left behind bill enacted by congress that aimed at ensuring that all children in America would attain free elementary education. Although the author was at the forefront of advocating for this system, she is now opposed to it. The testing system according to the author has been used as a means to close down schools and judge both performance of students and teachers without taking into account other factors. Ravitch states that this system requires that schools be given yearly-standardized exams to monitor the progress of the students. These tests are meant to show if students meet the adequate yearly progress goals.…
While completing this activity, I learned about how a board member feels about if standardized testing improves motivation, if the media portrays test data accurately and thoroughly, how results from standardized testing are used to improve instruction and curriculum, and if she thought standardized testing would increase or decrease over the next decade. More importantly, I learned that the Smithville Board of Education is made up of people from a variety of backgrounds, with vast knowledge, and who truly can about teachers, students, and administrators in the district. The person I interviewed is not only a school board member, but she is also a retired teacher from a neighboring school district. She continues to work for that district as a long term substitute. She hold a life-time certification in K-8 Elementary education,…
The only instance in which Ravitch falls short is in her failure to present a proposed solution to the issue. “The Essentials of a Good Education,” by Diane Ravitch presents ideas about the current education system in the United States. In this piece there are many points brought up regarding the down sides to standardized testing. There is also the issue presented of the perceptions of students in the system by legislators. Is using standardized testing to measure quality of education a good gage?…
Biased information defeats every purpose of an argument that a person or persons are trying to make. The article “The Importance of a Good Education” by Diane Ravitch is an article discussing the author’s biased beliefs on the No Child Left Behind bill. The information that the author gives is biased based on the way the author presents her information and that she works at a liberal college. Ravitch fails to contrast the benefit of the math and science scores due to the bill; “The long-term Nation's Report Card (NAEP) results, released in July 2005, showed elementary school student achievement in reading and math at all-time highs and the achievement gap closing” (www.2.ed.gov) She fails to analyze both sides of the argument for the “No Child…
Diane Ravitch and John Gatto both set up their arguments to have a message mirroring each other, in that the current system that schools have in order to teach kids is failing and needs to be refined. Diane Ravitch approaches this view in contrast to Gatto. She builds her argument around the solution that children should be educated in such a way that sets them up for citizenhood during and after high school. Gatto’s approach takes a different view in which children are responsible for their own education and it should be left up to the individual students on whether or not they wish to “take away an education rather than merely receive a schooling,” (Gatto, page 115). Both build up to this belief through their separate experiences within the schooling system.…
Pros of No Child Left Behind Does anyone ever want to see a child fail at anything? I am sure your answer is probably no? But several years ago a topic that has reared its ugly head has been the topic of conversation in many schools and even at many of the education boards at the highest level in Congress.…
1) According to Ravitch, is public education broken and in need of fixing? Discuss her arguments regarding this situation. No, the public education system is not broken and in need of fixing.…
In the Pre-K classroom that I observed it consisted of several different centers for the children to participate in, such as: block area, dramatic play, art, library, sand/water table, music/movement, sensory area, finger painting, play dough, and the students got the opportunity to make their own snacks. Not only did the students get to participate in centers, they had the opportunity each day to go outside and play on the playground as well as having an interactive lecture every morning at circle time and when the students sat down at their tables to do their daily worksheet. I believe that the Pre-K class I observed was a mix between traditional teaching as well as constructivism, creating a balance between the two. In the morning during circle time, the teacher would “lecture” the students with the letter of the day, go over the date, months, days of the week, shapes, and the numbers up to the date it currently was.…
As a parent, I send my kids to school with the intention that this is what is best for my kids. There are many different theories on raising children. Just like there is many different styles of teaching. However, the main consensus is kids need to go to school to become functioning intelligent members of society. The government controls our schools and measures the success of them by tests scores.…