Both books include someone who plays the role of the villain and they both have symbolism that tell the readers of the good and evil that come with either side. In Dracula, the plot moves forward with an external conflict while in Jekyll and Hyde, it moves forward with an internal one. The books portray a concept that many writer use today to tell stories suck as Batman. In comparison to each other, Stevenson had a better interpretation of the theme because his story is a bit more relatable. He writes about the internal struggle of good and evil, which almost everyone has had or will have in their life. It seems more real, even though it obviously has supernatural elements to it. Regardless to who told it better, both books portray a relevant theme, good will always triumph over
Both books include someone who plays the role of the villain and they both have symbolism that tell the readers of the good and evil that come with either side. In Dracula, the plot moves forward with an external conflict while in Jekyll and Hyde, it moves forward with an internal one. The books portray a concept that many writer use today to tell stories suck as Batman. In comparison to each other, Stevenson had a better interpretation of the theme because his story is a bit more relatable. He writes about the internal struggle of good and evil, which almost everyone has had or will have in their life. It seems more real, even though it obviously has supernatural elements to it. Regardless to who told it better, both books portray a relevant theme, good will always triumph over