Rational Choice Crime Theory Analysis

Improved Essays
between the juvenile and adult courts rest on the presiding judge or the prosecutor (Moak and Wallace, 2003). These practices and policies had the drastic effect of reducing the significance of the age of majority in trying and sentencing cases as it negates a core principle of the juvenile justice system. Minors are identified as lacking a rational mind to freely choose to commit a crime and have an investing self-interest in committing it based on the Rational Choice crime theory (Lawrence and Hesse, 2009). The application of this theory shows that minors will benefit more from rehabilitation to correct misconduct or unlawful behavior instead of punishment (Lawrence and Hesse, 2009). This theory applies to crimes committed regardless of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    An estimated 250,000 youth are tried, sentenced, or incarcerated every year across the United States (campaign for youth justice). There is large controversy regarding whether or not children and young adults should be required to be sentenced as adults, regardless of their age and circumstance. This is believed to be the most logical way of approaching this matter because every case should undergo the same consequences despite the criminal’s circumstances. An opposing view would argue that it is necessary to take into consideration the situation of each criminal case before deciding on the punishment. They would also claim that children specifically, should be given another chance due to their lack of maturity.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kids and adults are not alike in the slightest. Kids are still developing well into their teenage years and do not have the same thought processes as adults. I have done extensive research on this topic. A Juvenile should not be charged in an adult court under any circumstances. In this essay, three things will be discussed; that kids brains are not developed enough to make complex decisions, that courts have no scientific or logical reason to try a minor in adult court, and that it is cruel and unusual to punish kids and adult the same way.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For many decades and centuries there has been a debate within the criminologists population about the causes to become a criminal. Throughout time, people have tried to come to a conclusion about what could be the cause for crime. It was perceived that there was one single cause for someone to commit a crime, whether it was robbery or murder. The reason in the 17th century would be that, the accused is possessed(Causes of Crime). As technology and society advanced, many criminologists began to have a different perspective.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the modern legal system, most jurisdictions view a person as an adult at 18 years of age. Until a person reaches this age, they are less likely to receive the full extent of a jurisdiction’s legal system. At certain parts in a child’s life, age can be used as a valid defense. If a person is under 7 years of age, they will not be charged in most jurisdictions. From the age of 7 to the age of responsibility, which is usually recognized as 16 but varies by jurisdiction, an offender can be tried in the juvenile system (criminal Law Today).…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequently, they are more prone to risk taking and peer influence than adults; they think less about their future and express their emotions in more volatile ways. The juvenile system recognizes this distinct adolescent nature, and allows for recovery through developmentally appropriate programs, making young adults under eighteen better suited for the juvenile system rather than the adult system. However, when young law-breakers murder or rape someone, it is much more difficult call on whether they should be tried as adults or juveniles. The decision should be made on a case-by-case basis, depending on the severity, motive, and nature of the crimes. For example, a sixteen-year-old boy murdering his father to protect his sister warrants a different analysis than a case of a remorseless sixteen-year-old boy who murdered a mother and her two young children to steal a car.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over years of cases and research, it has been found that a large proportion of false confessions are made by juveniles. To combat the rate of false confessions, there needs to be a reform of the legal practices used in juvenile court cases. The first significant step the court took in showing that adults and children are different was the case Roper v. Simmons – the ruling of this case forbid the use of execution on individuals under the age of 18. The court acknowledged that there are developmental differences between adults and children that make children at less fault for their crimes. These developmental differences include the “immaturity of judgement”, which highlights the differences of children and adults when it comes to risk taking, impulse control, and reasoning.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Adolescents need to know what results from their actions. Because of this, it is followed that juveniles should be tried as adults. If children want to act like adults and commit crimes, then they should be treated as adults and…

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the criminal justice system, there are many varying elements that contribute to the process through which accused offenders are counseled. As is expected, there are also numerous moral and ethical disputes that come with the territory, such as whether or not children, or 'juveniles', should be tried as adults in court for the violent crimes they commit. Some may say any child over the age of five should know the difference between right and wrong; for an individual to plan out a crime and act on it, the punishment should fit the offense, no matter the age. However, there is a thin line between vice and neurosis when it comes to juveniles. The incarceration of individuals under the age of sixteen at adult correctional facilities…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Criminal Justice Model

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Online Class Paper In 2010 the U.S Supreme Court ruled juvenile life sentences are illegal for crimes less than murder. More than 2,500 inmates are sentence to life as children, 128 have a chance to obtain release. Kenneth Young is trying to reduce his sentence for a mistake he made when he was fifteen years old. On Saturday July 1st, 2000 Kenneth Young committed an armed robbery with twenty-four year old Jacques Bethea.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adolescents are incapable of making a responsible decision. Envision your child committing a crime and then being sentenced to life in prison without parole. Unfortunately this is a case for over 100,000 teens today. Currently in today's society there has been a pending issue on weather juvenile offenders should be tried as adults for committing the most heinous crimes. This controversial issue has began evolve into a movement to reconstruct…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The main assumption of rational choice theory are that individuals have free will to make their own choices in life. This includes delinquent behavior as well as status offenses committed by juveniles. I believe that rational choice theory should not apply to juveniles due to the fact that their brains are not fully developed. This along with any mental issues can lead to poor decision making. It is safe to say that children cannot logically process information as some adults do.…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over 100 years ago the United States established the Juvenile Justice system. In most states, a person who between the ages of 10 and 18 charged with a crime is considered a juvenile . The juvenile justice system main goal is to help rehabilitation rather than punishing the individual and held youths who commit crimes responsible for their action. Where adults who are accused and found guilty of a crime, the criminal justice courts focus on punishments. There are many debates over the juvenile justice on whether or not the system should need to focus more on proving rehabilitation or punishment like the adult criminal justice system .…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A Brief Overview of the Rational Choice Theory When analyzing the rational choice theory, I remain committed to the opinion that crime is committed out of personal gain. There is this theory that tells us that people are able to make clear and concise decisions, knowing full well what those decisions are. This theory is known as the rational choice theory. Not only does the rational choice theory tell us people make the decision to do what they want to do when committing crimes, they are “rational” in doing so.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A rise in juvenile crime is becoming more and more of an issue in the present day. The only way to resolve this problem is to start sanctioning violent juveniles as adults. Juveniles should be able to be charged as adults in court because they commit violent crimes, they know the difference between right and wrong, communities would be safer, and juveniles would be deterred from committing crimes in the present and the future. Even though they are younger, juveniles are just as capable of committing the same violent crimes as adults. When they do, juveniles should receive the same sentence for committing the same crime.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Summary Criminology studies the reasoning and factors as to why individuals engage in criminal activities. In classical criminology, social philosophers Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham developed a theory of crime that criminologist and theorist still use today (Akers 2017). In classical criminology, an individual commits a crime by making a rational decision. That decision is based off of whether the benefits that one might receive by offending outweighs the consequences such as being caught and cited or sentenced. Individuals base their decision to offend or not offend on what they have seen others suffer, their knowledge of what consequences they may endure and their own personal experiences.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays