Rational Being Alone Have Moral Worth Analysis

Improved Essays
Throughout the article, Rational Beings Alone have Moral Worth, it discusses how animals are treated and explains why they are treated in that manner. Kant believes that animals have do not have a self-conscious, they lack a will and they do not have rational thinking since they are only driven by wants and needs; this is why we have no direct duties to them. Animals may not have the highest rational ability but they do have a thought process that allows them to continue to stay alive and meet their ends.
When discussing self-consciousness with animals, no not all animal know that they are a being. There are all types of different self-consciousness and animals can have the negative kind. The negative kind, for example, is if an animal feels like it is being watched or preyed on it runs away or hides. That is considered self-awareness which in other terms is self-consciousness. Kant is
…show more content…
Rational thinking is based on thinking of reason and facts. Bringing back up eating and sleeping; this is thinking from reason and fact. It is reasonable to go to sleep when tired and that is also a fact, people and animals sleep when tired. Just because an animal does not have a bed or home like a human does not mean they are not rational. Animals do not have this highly intensive thought process otherwise, they would be exactly like us but they are a product of their environment just as we are. They are living in the wilderness, it gets cold, hot, rains, snows and etc. they do what they see fit to survive and for humans that so happened to be build houses, heaters and air conditioners. Who is Kant to say that because we thought to build a structure to keep us warm means we are smarter and more superior than animals? This all goes back to how Kant gave this list of what makes humans better than animals when in reality it is the same for both just we physically talk and animals have forms of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay-2 CHALLENGE FROM MARGINAL CASES Having gone through the ‘Challenge from Marginal Cases: in the Article “Puppies, Pigs and People”, it seems the author Alastair Norcross is of the view that any mutilation or torture to non-human animals is morally impermissible irrespective of the actions of Fred’s behavior and torture of the animals or slaughtering or mutilation of farmed animals. He argues that there is no difference as the animal is mutilated in either case. In one case Fred tortures his puppies directly to obtain cocoamone for his pleasure whereas in other case farmed animals are slaughtered to cater the need of the people. From the above I feel, Fred is a rare consumer of cocoamone and the way he treats or torture puppies himself in an unorganized way and keep animal…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article written by Jeremy Rifkin titled “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Rifkin argues that researchers have found that animals are similar to humans, which changes our perspectives of them. He elaborates how the research funded by fast food franchises reveal that pigs require mental and physical stimuli to function and how that caused European countries to change the way they treat pigs. The author extends on the similar emotional and cognitive abilities of animals and humans by demonstrating studies on the conceptual abilities of New Caledonian crows and the language abilities of Koko the gorilla. Rifkin continues to describe how animals have self-awareness and understand when they die, as evidenced by observations of orangutans…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Payton White Professor Hunsaker 3 September 2016 Articles 26 & 27 After analyzing article 26, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” by Alastair Norcross, a couple things become apparent. Such as (only use “such as” if you are continuing the sentence, but not to start a new sentence.) our author opening up his piece with a fictional scenario that seems a tad bit crazy, but serves as a very serious philosophical point. According to our ( it would be best to just say, “the” author instead of “our” author.) author, Norcross sees meat-eaters-at least those who know of the treatment of factory-farmed animals-are completely at fault for the consumption of meat.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no doubting the fact that animals do not have rights in the conventional sense, or in any other sense for that matter. The reason is because they are not moral agents; they cannot do things out of a sense of right or wrong and cannot reason, as opposed to humans. Without reasoning, they are unable to have rights and therefore, are not responsible. Does that mean humans have the right to treat animals badly? Of course not; but that is for humans to decide, because animals cannot decide anything.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Korsgaard, who preaches the Neo-Kantian theories of philosophy, also makes a point that living beings, both human and non-human, can have intrinsic moral worth without having high rationality. She argues that humans face the problem of normativity, which emerges because of the reflective structure of human consciousness. Our reflective capacities make us less impulsive and allow us to take decisions in a more matured manner. When we determine whether a particular desire of ours should be reason enough to act on, we engage in a deeper level of reflection. Korsgaard points out that humans face the problem of normativity in a way that non-humans do not, by explaining how a lower animal’s perceptions of the world are its beliefs and its desires and impulses are its will.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PHI 1000 Fall 2016 Prof. Drain Essay #2 Thoughts on Thought After examining the several angles to the issue of animal cognition, it is my conclusion that non-human animals are in fact capable of thought. Although humans certainly display a superior cognitive ability, I believe the cognition of animals is not of an entirely different type, and that whatever difference remains is simply one of degree. While Davidson and Descartes tend to argue that language is a necessary component for rational creatures, Hobbes and Searle give non-human creatures more “cognitive credit,” citing their ability perceive, and to have and correct beliefs, as proof of being conscious, thinking, beings. Pointing to the immense biological similarities between humans…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison of “All Animals Are Equal and Moral Standing,” the “Value of Lives, and Speciesism” the key differences are based on the values outlined by the writers. In Value of Lives and Speciesism, Frey discusses the importance of animals feel pain and suffer just as humans do, but also admits that there are reasons such as necessary medical research for harming animals. On the other hand, Singer’s All Animals Are Equal focuses on the rights of hemostats in comparison to those who can make intelligent decisions. The question is should non-human animals have rights and how far do those rights reach? Both agree that animals should have rights, but their major differences including, pleasure and pain, hierarchy, consumption, and richness of life.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We use our attachment to religion, creations stories, and emotions to set ourselves about the rest of the animal kingdom. We are bound by natural law and, to a certain extent, animalistic instinct. In several ways, we can do things better than the average beaver, but in many other ways we are more…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In All Animals Are Equal, the philosopher Peter Singer argues that we should extend the basic principle of equality to non-human animals. In order to justify this claim, the author examines the foundations of the basic principle of equality, establishing a moral system that takes into account the equal consideration of interests of living beings. Peter Singer states that in order for a being to have interests at all, one must take into account the capacity of suffering and enjoyment, or in other words, sentience. Throughout this chapter, Singer makes his readers see that if one rejects racism and sexism, one must also reject the idea of giving special consideration to the interests of one species over another one. In this essay, I will firstly reconstruct the arguments used by Singer to arrive at the conclusion that all animals are equal.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals are Smart Some people think that we are superior to animals but I think that animals are as smart as we are. Pets react to your moods and seem to know just when It’s dinner time! Some animals use tools, communicate and think for their own. If animals can use tools, they must be smart.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet, despite its influence, Kantian ethics seems to have several weaknesses. First, since people are emotional beings, reason and rationality is usually not enough to motivate them act morally. Another weakness is that Kant’s categorical imperative allows for much mistreatment of animals that should not be considered morally right. Therefore, although Kantian ethics provides many strong arguments, one should always critically evaluate the ideas that are presented, especially when it deals with such a subtle and controversial issue as…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology And Abortion

    • 1024 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The topic of abortion has been controversial since abortions first started. Everyone seems to have their own opinion based on their ideals and then there are always the odd circumstances. Deontology is an ethical theory that cares only about the motivations of an action. It deals with the motives a person has and whether those intentions are moral or immoral. Also deontology believes that we should resect autonomy which is people’s freedom to choose.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Student Course Date Singer’s Principle of Equal Consideration of Interest In his seminal work, Animal Liberation, Peter Singer, puts forth the principle of equal consideration of interest in which he argues that for any being that possesses interests, those interests must be considered to be correspondingly morally significant with the identical interests of another being. Singer applies this principle to all sentient beings and uses sentience as the crucial characteristic for admissibility into the moral society (Singer 57). Singer’s argument has been challenged numerous times, this one by Francis and Norman.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays