Randy Betancourt Case Analysis

Decent Essays
All,
I am pleased to announce that Randy Betancourt has accepted the Technical Analyst II – Zone position for the Treasure Coast Market based out of St Lucie Medical Center. His official start date will be 6/12. We as a team will be working on a transition plan to ensure coverage in both Palm Beach and Treasure Coast Markets is managed with minimum impact.

Randy has been working with HCA since 2010, starting as a Technical Analyst at Columbia Hospital. He quickly moved to JFK and Palms West Hospital finding more opportunities to utilize his skills, shortly after he was permanently placed at Palms West Hospital where he worked toward receiving a promotion to Technical Analysist II. Randy continues to work on numerous projects and implementations

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Donn Milton Case Summary

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Donn Milton, Dr. v. IIT Research Institute Parties: Donn Milton severed as a Vice President of IITRI's Advanced Technology Group, which included TSMI and several other projects. IITR is a nonprofit organization and uses Tax Exempt status for several projects. Milton filed suit against IITRI in Virginia state court for wrongful discharge and breach of contract. IITRI removed the case to federal court and successfully moved to dismiss. Donn Milton was a petitioner who was employed with defendant IITRI.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gurley's Case Summary

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On 20th November 2014, a 28-year-old African-American man, Akai Gurley was fatally shot by Peter Liang, a 27-year-old rookie New York City Police Department officer in Brooklyn, New York City, United States. This tragedy happened when Liang and his partner, Shaun Landau patrolling stairwells in the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA)’s Louis Pink Houses in East New York, Brooklyn. According to the New York Post, Gurley was unarmed when he was shot by Liang.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garcia Case Summary

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages

    On September 29, 2015, Sean Mathew Garcia from Montebello, California was arrested for the shooting and death of Brian Lee Gomez. Prior to the incident, both individuals had agreed to meet up at the 1600 block of Neil Armstrong Street, so that Garcia could purchase a 2,000 dollar gold necklace from Gomez. As Gomez made his was to get the necklace from his vehicle, Garcia retrieved an assault rifle from a bush, and began to shot Gomez multiple times. Garcia was caught fleeing from the scene by a surveillance camera minutes after. When investigators went to Garcia’s home to investigate, they found several pieces of evidence that linked him to the crime.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Capistrano Unified School District took the parents of Jeremy Wartenberg, Wayne and Charlene Wartenberg to court in their refusal to pay for Jeremy’s private school tuition, fees spent at the private school, and attorney fees. The school district expresses that Jeremy’s behavior comes from his own willfulness to misbehave not his disability. The school psychologist, although acknowledging that Jeremy had a learning disability of attention deficit disorder (ADD), which allowed for an IEP and services, felt that it was not sever enough to be a contributing factor to his behavior. He felt that Jeremy’s primary behavior was largely related to his failure to work, cooperate, and school truancies rather than his primarily disability of ADD. He acknowledged that Jeremy’s behavior could be a contributing factor of his Conduct Disorder, which is not covered under a learning…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cases of Fernando and Elizabeth Key: A Note on the Status of Blacks in Seventeenth-Century Virginia discusses the two court cases of Fernando and Elizabeth Key. Warren Billings begins by stating Alden T. Vaughn’s note on the Africans who arrived in Virginia between 1619 and 1630 as those who are the origins of chattel slavery and racial prejudice. The two court cases of the blacks reveal how being a Christian in this time can affect your status as a slave and how the Christian black status soon deteriorated.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gregory Johnson Case

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Name of Case Texas v. Johnson 491 U.S. 397, 109 S.CT. 2533 (1989) 2. Facts of Case Gregory Johnson joined a protest in Dallas, Texas during the 1984 Republican Convention. During the protest Johnson burned a flag as others chanted.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I selected three primary sources, The Trial of Andrew Johnson, 1868, Ku Klux Klan, 1868, and Kamikaze Attack, 1944. The trial of Andrew Johnson, 1868 is mainly about how the Judiciary Committee finds a way to impeach Andrew Johnson, but Johnson got to stay as a president by one lucky vote. The Ku Klux Klan is about an organization killing slaves and carpet baggers for fun, and how their organization got big in the south. The Kamikaze Attack was a battle between the Japanese and the American Navy, there was a lot of people kill and it explains how bad the battle was. My first primary source is The Trial of Andrew Johnson, 1868, the Radical Republicans where not happy with Andrew Johnson beliefs, Andrew Johnson changed his beliefs about readmitting…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Randall Harold Cunningham (“Randy”) was a Vietnam war hero and a Republican Congress member who represented the 50th Congressional District from years 1991 to 2005 (Stern, 2005). Moreover, he held a spot on the House Intelligence Committee, the House Appropriations Committee and the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee (“DAS”). DAS is responsible for making drafts of bills that set appropriations for defense programs (Stern, 2005). On November 28, 2005, in federal court at the age of 64, Randy pled guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery, mail fraud, wire fraud, and tax evasion (Archibold, 2006). Randy’s bribery offense involved him taking $2.4 million in bribes from military contractors Mitchell Wade, and others, in exchange for making it easier for them to receive pentagon contracts (Archibold, 2006).…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    FL Commissioner Roger Goodell was subsequently hauled in to testify before a House Judiciary Committee in October 2009 about safety measures, and stricter guidelines were established in the pro game to limit head injuries. Still, dozens of former players embarked on legal action against the NFL in 2011, claiming that the league had failed to adequately warn and protect them. As of the summer of 2015, more than 5,000 former players were involved in a consolidated lawsuit, with a settlement figure of $765 million deemed insufficient by a…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tom Brady Case Analysis

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Have you ever thought about an NFL that never applied discipline? Tom Brady was allegedly deflating footballs in the 2014-2015 AFC Championship against the Indianapolis Colts, but was never punished. Although it is not fully proven, there is plenty of evidence that Tom Brady has violated the integrity of the game multiple times, therefore, Tom Brady should be harshly punished. The NFL and people everywhere have been way too easy on Tom Brady.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Gonzalez vs. Raich case, this case was one that brought upon numerous questions to the citizens in California. While both of the parties had distinctive arguments, there was always one question that many individuals had, regarding who would eventually prevail? There were debates discussing interstate commerce and whether the use of medical marijuana was a part of this debate as it was grown in the state of California, but could this event affect other states? Did Congress truly have the power to regulate medical marijuana, as it was not explicitly written out in the Constitution? Well, after truly interpreting the case and understanding the facts, I do feel that I would have ruled the case to be in the hands of the states.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brad Mette Case

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages

    May 2 for most farmers would revolve around finish planting beans, post-crop emergence chemical application, or applying nitrogen to the corn crops via side dress bar. In some unfortunate years due to conditions that are out of human control, those events are prevented from taking place. This is the situation that Brad Mette and I witnessed in Marion County (near Salem, IL) on Thursday, May 2. Due to a very wet spring, farmers in the area are still attempting to plant the corn crop. Some for a second time, while others are still on their first attempt.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kurt Warner Case Study

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1) Kurt Warner was by all accounts an average athlete – he was never the physical stud that “carried” a team to a championship as some would say – rather through hard work, practice and excellent managerial skills he was able to lead his teams to championships. As such he displayed the traits of a competent leader, both building teams, and driving those teams of athletes to individual peak performance and positive results. A prime example of his ability to get results from those under him was his mentorship of Larry Fitzgerald upon his arrival to the Arizona Cardinals. When Larry had made his first Pro-Bowl and was beginning to get complacent and perhaps plateau, confident in the sense that he had made it. Kurt asked, “Larry, don’t you…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Scott Bradshaw Case

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Innocent Scott Bradshaw is innocent due to the regulation of reasonable doubt. According to dictionary.com reasonable doubt is defined as “uncertainty as to a criminal defendant's guilt; the level of certainty a juror must have to find a defendant guilty of a crime.” Due to the facts of the case and the forensics report, there is enough reasonable doubt to keep Bradshaw from being convicted of one murder count. The other murder count is of Jeff Booker and he was shot inside the store and ran down the street bleeding out and dying 2 blocks down the street. Reasonable doubt was put into the criminal justice system to attempt to ensure that a defendant was not wrongly accused.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aaron Hernandez is a tight end for the New England Patriots. He played college football for the Florida Gators, and he was a member of the BCS National Championship. He was drafted in the fourth round by the New England Patriots. He was a wealthy NFL player that stays in his four story home with an in ground pool, in North Attleboro, Massachusetts for one million dollars. Throughout his personal life he has been in trouble by the law.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays