Ramona Salvarez Interview

Improved Essays
Today I will be interviewing The Honorable Ramona Salvarez about her being an honorable judge.

Me: How is your role in government different from an elected official?

Salvarez: The role I play in the government differs from those who are elected officials. For example, I review cases and then observe the evidence, I make sure that all the facts are facts and that they are justifiable. Us judges are here to serve the people, we aren’t elected on a political party, we are elected by the President and not the people.

Me: So the President elects judges and not the people because your main role is to on the people? I completely understand that. How are elected officials and judges the same?

Salvarez: Elected officials and judges are the same because we all serve the same purpose and that is to fulfil the will of the people. At the end of the day, we all want justice and equality in our communities, so we work hand in hand to do everything we can do just for the people.
…show more content…
Do you feel that judges are appreciated?

Salvarez: I believe we are appreciated but it’s just the fact that people do not understand the big role we play as well as elected officials in our country. We can not really blame anyone but things like that do not really concern the people until election time or maybe not even by that time.

Me: That indeed is true because people do not know the facts when they are voting they just base their vote off what they were told. So do you think judges should be elected?

Salvarez: I believe the way it is is just fine. The president should always be the one to elect judges because if the people were able to do it they would not know what they are looking for.

Me: So can you explain what judicial review

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Question #1: The first compromise was the decision to replace the Articles of Confederation rather than amend it. The initial plan of the Constitutional Convention attendees was to amend the Articles of Confederation. Two attendees, Governor Randolph from Virginia and William Patterson from New Jersey, shared their own modifications early on, known as the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. As these plans were discussed, it became obvious that a new document was needed.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, in this trial, the implications of an elected versus appointed judge can be seen. Judge Horton did the right thing by overturning the conviction of Haywood Patterson, he did so at great risk. Horton, an elected judge, basically ended his career with this move. It is this situation that leads me to believe that judges should be appointed rather than elected. Not every judge, especially when put in a situation like this, would have the integrity to ignore the political ramifications of their decision.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges, in Texas are elected in partisan elections for 4 year terms, and appeals court judges are elected for 6 year terms. If a position become vacant the Governor may fill the vacancy by appointing a replacement until the next…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Three Branches

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Three Branches In order for the United State of America to have equal power, so that one person would not have more power over another. The Founding Fathers decided to write a constitution to divide the powers in to three branches. Each branches holds different types of responsibilities, but when they combine their powers, it will make sure the government is run smoothly and fairly, so that it is following the citizens’ rights. Each branches has an ability to keep the other two in check and that is how they would maintain balance amongst the three branches.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    El Salvador Ideology

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Therefore, an independent national judicial assembly was established to substitute a fair and autonomous bench; also, some schools for judicial trainings were established to improve the professionalism of magistrates and other judicial officials, so the government could do the best from the human rights regulations. Also, a special commission was established to study the current reforms to the electoral code. In addition, Ramón Villalta states that “As long as the (composition of the) Supreme Court remains in the hands of the Asamblea Legislativa (Congress) and is subject to the agreements between party leaderships, it will serve those interests and help society” (Wiarda, p.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Review: The Common Place of Law The Common Place of Law is an interesting empirical research of legal consciousness that is actually a very strong logical theory, in which law is recognized as both constituting and being constituted by social relations and cultural practice. The question that Ewick and Silbey spawn their theory from comes from the classic question, “how is the law experienced” rather than “what is the law,” this was a very compellingly argument made by Ewick and Silbey. The latter question that I saw arise from their argument was from where did most of the classic legal theory and jurisprudence; and did they spring from the subset question “how is the law experienced”. Seeing that law is not something that only exist and can be studied, but law is created by the process of inquiry and definition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Gawthrop “One reason for confusion and delusion is that the engines of democracy and bureaucracy run on different tracks, leaving from different stations and heading for different destinations…When they do converge, the inevitable result is as Waldo politely suggest a dialectical “happening”, by which I assume he means a hell of a train wreck”(1997, p. 205), this is a wonderful analogy that to me speaks to the problem of combining the two systems while understanding their similarities. Stivers also speaks about the similarities and differences but with a more positive outlook, how a bureaucrat that learns some of the skill from elected officials who have developed interpersonal skills that help form relationships with citizens can help citizens that deal with bureaucrats feel like people rather than a case. This has to do with responsiveness of bureaucrats versus their responsibility to the public, “…most locate the primary roots of responsibility in the expertise and morality of the individual bureaucrat”(1994, p. 365). Knowing that most of the time those in public office must try and keep their personal morals out of their job it is hard for bureaucrats to walk that fine line without the guidance of democracy. One thing that Stivers touches on that none of the other authors did was how a public administrator in either system cannot just listen to the loud voices but to…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution of the United States is best understood as the product of a balancing act between the Founders’ desire to avoid a tyranny and their recognition of the need to form a strong government that would ensure national stability and prosperity. The Appointments Clause of the Constitution fits within this framework nicely. Article II, Section 2, Clause II of the Constitution states that “the President…shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint… Judges of the supreme Court.” The clause establishes a clear division of power between the executive and legislative branches in nominating and confirming Supreme Court Justices.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stomayor Speech Analysis

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sonia Sotomayor, a judge, in her speech Opening Statement to The Senate Judiciary Committee, describes her past and her accomplishments such as all of her experience being a judge and her nomination into the supreme court by president Obama. She writes about her experiences and shares her accomplishments so that her audience sees why she is a good candidate to be in the supreme court. Sotomayor’s purpose is to persuade and seek the support of the judges and America for her election into the supreme court. She supports her purpose with rhetorical appeals such as ethos and pathos. Sotomayor uses an optimistic tone and rhetorical appeals in order to convey her audience to vote for her to be in the Supreme court.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Dbq Analysis

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although a majority of documents convey the impression, to be against the Supreme Court having the power to question the constitutionality of federal laws; but the amount of documents that agree, have more solid evidence in their argument. The Supreme Court should have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. Federalist No. 78, the Marbury v. Madison decision, Article III of the Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 are prime examples to prove that the judicial branch has the authority to do so. First of all, in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788; declares that, “[The] courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature...”(Doc D).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Murder on a Sunday Morning is a documentary that follows the trial of 15 year old Brenton Butler in order to prove his innocence by displaying the ethical issues behind the case. Brenton Butler was accused for murdering Maryann Stephens who was walking with her husband to their hotel room after breakfast, when he supposedly approached Ms. Stephens and demanded for her purse at gun point, then proceeded to lift his gun and shot her in the face, leaving Mr. Stephens as the eye witness to the crime. When questioned by detectives, Mr. Stephens describes the shooter to be a tall, skinny built black male wearing a dark shirt and shorts, and a fishing hat. Police who were surveying the area spotted Brenton Butler who coincidentally fit the description. Brenton, who was on his way to apply at a local Blockbuster store was told by police of a murder that happened nearby, and was asked to go to the police station to answer questions about what he may have seen; however, the 15 year old ended up in the back of a…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, a judge has to be nominated by the President (stated in Article II Section 2 in the U.S. Constitution) Obama can replace whomever he wants to (filling in for Justice Scalia) Once the President has nominated a judge, the Senate Judiciary Committee needs to confirm and the President needs to appoint the new judge. Secondly, the Judiciary Committee has a three step process as to confirming a supreme court judge. Firstly, the Committee does an investigation into the judge’s background. Next, the Committee will hold a public hearing in which the judge is questioned and gives testimonies about everything from his or her judicial philosophy to his or her stand on abortion.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alan Bialostozky Comm 100C Professor McMurria Spring 2015 Take home exam #3 Leo Chavez article “The Latino Treat Narrative” proposes a well-supported narrative to the nation’s anti-immigration discourse displayed by the media mostly in the USA. In this article, Chavez gives a critical overview and discussion about the images, stereotypes and falsified truths reproduced in society using and crafting recycled myths created by media experts, corrupt politicians, and people who openly hate immigrants from a Latino background. Chavez closely examines how “citizenship” has been seen and discussed through the legal organizations as a form of unity in the country through social and political participation. He claims that just critiquing discourse…

    • 3459 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you go out and about within our country and you ask people if they knew very much about the United States court system, they will most likely tell you that they do not know very much about the court system unless they have been involved with the court system whether it be federal or state level. Most people do not realize that the court systems have three levels within them or that there is certain situation that will allow you to get to one level or the other. There is a whole lot of information that some people may not know. They may not know about judicial review and how it came about. Some people may not even know how justices decide the ruling of their cases.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays