Zaroff put Rainsford in a dehumanizing situation where he had no other option but to kill him in order to survive. This negative action caused Rainsford to react with pure instinct going against his beliefs. Zaroff exclaimed “Instinct is no match for reason.”, meaning animals only used instinct when being hunted, making them far to easy to hunt. Animals do not use reason in order to survive, ostensibly reason triumphs against instinct in means of survival. According to Zaroff, instinct is no match for what humans possess. Reason is what distinguishes humans apart form animals. Both, Rainsford and Zaroff share similar logic but from opposing views. Rainsford is strongly against the murder of humans merely for sport, whilst Zaroff craves a more "dangerous game” with ingrained reason for an onerous test. Although, Rainsford goes against his own belief and kills Zaroff, which goes to show you are unable to have any morals en-order to succeed then to climactically
Zaroff put Rainsford in a dehumanizing situation where he had no other option but to kill him in order to survive. This negative action caused Rainsford to react with pure instinct going against his beliefs. Zaroff exclaimed “Instinct is no match for reason.”, meaning animals only used instinct when being hunted, making them far to easy to hunt. Animals do not use reason in order to survive, ostensibly reason triumphs against instinct in means of survival. According to Zaroff, instinct is no match for what humans possess. Reason is what distinguishes humans apart form animals. Both, Rainsford and Zaroff share similar logic but from opposing views. Rainsford is strongly against the murder of humans merely for sport, whilst Zaroff craves a more "dangerous game” with ingrained reason for an onerous test. Although, Rainsford goes against his own belief and kills Zaroff, which goes to show you are unable to have any morals en-order to succeed then to climactically