Rainsford Vs Zaroff

Improved Essays
In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Rainsford and Zaroff have distinct values regarding hunting, which generates many disagreements between them. Zaroff is a mindless hunter who is known for his ferocity, while Rainsford is renowned for his esteem and incisive skills. The combination of these two hunters is truly entertaining. This story will reveal aspects of both characters and explain how they dealt with the obstacles they had to overcome. Rainsford and Zaroff are two divergent hunters that experience difficult situations throughout the story because of their own hunting styles.
Zaroff is a headstrong hunter who notes vibrancy in hunting humans because it enables him to experience danger, which is opposing Rainsford’s beliefs.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As states by Zaroff "But no animal can reason, objected Rainsford. My dear fellow, said the general, there is one that can." (Conell). Through this quote one can infer that Zaroff is suggesting that he is hunting humans but at first he never comes out and says it. Zaroff is also extremely cold hearted.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rainsford Quotes

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Zaroff is a big game hunter …… man. Zaroff will hunt rainsford but if rainsford gets away he is free but rainsford sets a trap to capture zaroff and he is the winner of the most dangerous game. Rainsford was a brave man that did not give up. Even when he fell overboard he still did not give up he swam to the island and from there he had to fight. He had to run away from zaroff because zaroff told him he had to run and not get cached…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever felt the adrenaline while hunting? The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell takes hunting to the max for an ultimate rush… hunting humans. Zaroff demonstrates that he is one dangerous, determined and rich person. First, Zaroff is a dangerous man because he decides to hunt humans.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This story shows examples of Man vs Nature when Rainsford is running around Ship-Trap Island. When Rainsford falls off the boat, he tries to scream for help but the water is rough, and the salty water is going into his mouth. He has no other option than to swim to shore, this is a challenge to Rainsford, but,“He fought the sea”(2). Rainsford runs away from Zaroff but then he gets stuck, ¨had fought his way through the bush for two hours¨(10).…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passionate Murders Graham Greene once said, "A murderer is regarded by the conventional world as something almost monstrous, but a murderer to himself is only an ordinary man. It is only if the murderer is a good man that he can be regarded as monstrous”. In the story "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell, General Zaroff needs to find a new animal to hunt. He loves hunting, but is bored of hunting the animals who live in the wilderness.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Zaroff, a man of textbook narcissistic sociopathy, to respect another and see him on an equal type scale, Rainsford must also be a sociopath too. The respect the two men have for each other, along with their similar views of the world, and society, and hunting, it is acceptable to assume that with the conclusion of Zaroff’s life at the end of the story that Rainsford takes over his practice of hunting humans. Throughout the three day experience, he is constantly re-composing himself and not allowing his emotions to take the wheel and direct his actions. He never really gets freaked out either, while yes his adrenaline is running high during the moments Zaroff is on his trail, he is generally calm and collected throughout the whole experience. All of his actions are calm and calculated.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rainsford then encounters another hunter, General Zaroff, whose ideal animal to hunt are humans, and Zaroff tries to persuade Rainsford to go hunt humans with him. In response, Rainsford states “Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer” (Connell 26). This quote proves that when Rainsford is being persuaded, he is not falling into the pressure to hunt humans. In addition, the statement by Rainsford presents a message to the reader to hold their ground and not be pressure to appease others. Moreover, Rainsford rejects Zaroff’s idea with his own morals and values of hunting humans as something that is morally wrong and unlawfully killing.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Zaroff not only has a good personality, but also a great mind. In “a cultivated voice” Zaroff tells Rainsford, “I’ve read your book about hunting snow leopards”, he has kept up on his reading and is well versed. His education puts him at a higher level of society making him a classy person. Having class and education are important qualities for a civilized person because they are traditionally more collected and calm than those aren’t. At their first meeting, Rainsford sees “the face of an aristocrat” in Zaroff.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Most Dangerous Game, an alternative short story features two key characters, General Zaroff and Sanger Rainsford. Rainsford, a world-renowned animal hunter, is faced with a wicked situation of being hunted as he lands on Zaroff's island, making him the protagonist and is sympathetic, meaning that we root for them and like them, in the given order. Although he is accustomed to a life of ease and treat, is removed when he is required to prevent himself from being hunted—making him a dynamic character due to significant changes in him over the course of the story. General Zaroff, a hunter of humans, is described by the narrator…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zaroff Character Analysis

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Zaroff looks at hunting humans for his own self interest, while Rainsford looks at it from a selfless view for the human population and thinks it is unethical. Rainsford and Zaroff both like to hunt but each character likes to hunt something different, which causes Rainsford to have ethics and Zaroff to be intelligent. There are a couple ways that Zaroff as well as Rainsford are alike. One is that they both enjoy hunting many different types of animals, as well as hunting all over the world.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Character vs. Self: The Lady or the Tiger? by Frank R. Character vs. self is best represented in the short story, The Lady or the Tiger? by Frank R. Stockton. In the story a princess’s true love was in the arena facing either life or death.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    General Zaroff is an aggressor, intimidator, and a bully to those human beings being hunted on his island. By General Zaroff being the hunter and not the hunted shows how he likes to be in control, yet still have the thrill and the excitement while hunting the human beings. Mostly because of what he is hunting now has the ability to reason on why they are being shot at or dying. By hunting something that has the ability to reason makes the game even more intense and more exhilarating to General Zaroff, “it gives me pleasure” (pg. 71). Even when General Zaroff felt failure when a dead tree fell on him while hunting Rainsford, he General Zaroff never gave up and still proceeded to be the hunter.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While at first General Zaroff seems to be an elegant, yet vain, aristocrat, he is soon revealed to be a savage murderer. His arrogance is a prevalent aspect of his disposition in Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game,” and is Zaroff’s inevitable downfall. Throughout the story, Zaroff’s excessive pride is depicted in a number of different ways: his belief in being the perfect hunter, his acting as God by killing human beings, and his arrogance in letting Rainsford free after catching him. The general believes that human life is his to take, as is exemplified when he claims that “life is...if needs be, [to be] taken by the strong.” Furthermore, he assumes that if “an angry god of the high seas” does not provide him with quarry, he is still…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rainsford also finds that this “game” of hunting humans does not rest upon him how hunting animals would. The conversation when Rainsford comes to understand that Zaroff hunts humans. He is shocked, and this is how it goes: “‘It must have courage, cunning, and, above all, it must be able to reason.' ‘But no animal can reason,’ objected Rainsford. ‘My dear fellow,’ said the general, ‘there is one that can.’…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hunt Is hunting for for you? If so, this is the game for you. Rainsford got stuck on an island with a crazy general called Zaroff . Zaroff likes hunting people but what Rainsford did not know is that he liked hunting people but gave them the nickname “animals”. In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell, Three literary elements Connell uses are suspense, imagery, and symbolism.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays