Raiders V. Williams Court Case

Improved Essays
In 1984 Williams was arrested for committing murder. It’s stated that he “was arrested for the murder a 10 year old girl” (2) which he discarded the body along a gravel road. The crime was committed in Des Moines, Iowa. “Following the disappearance of a 10 year old” (3) girl, about 200 people volunteer to look for the missing child, it stated that “covering an area several miles” (3) both ways. Right at the time of the search, right before William’s was arrested, two days after he killed the girl, he would surrendered to the police on one condition, to not be interrogated. On the ride back to Des Moines Williams made statements to the officers without an attorney present and in so incriminating himself by helping the officers find the girl’s body. Only right after the body was found was he was arrested and read his Miranda rights. He then was convicted of first degree murder. In court Williams did ask for the evidence to be suppress because the evidence where obtain illegally during the drive back to Des Moines, Iowa. The court denied his petition and was convicted anyways. Later on, habeas corpus was petition in federal court because the evidence was illegally acquired.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Name of the Case: State of Utah v. Travis Dee Timmerman Date Case was Decided: September 4, 2009 Court Rendering the Decision: Supreme Court of Utah Background: Travis Timmerman was charged with attempted rape, forcible sexual abuse, and assault. At the first hearing, the victim, Mrs. Timmerman, cited her spousal privilege not to testify against her husband. The State then presented Mrs. Timmerman’s statements made previously to the police and to a sexual assault nurse. Because of these statements, the magistrate bound Mr. Timmerman over for trial, Mr. Timmerman then filed a motion to void this stating that his confrontation rights under the federal and state constitutions were violated because he was unable to cross-examine Mrs. Timmerman…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Scarpelli Case Summary

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Criminal Justice Name: Institution Affiliation: Criminal Justice 1. Case Summary Question 1: Facts, issue, and court holding in case of Gagnon v. Scarpelli Facts. The defendant (Scarpelli) pleaded guilty in the year 1975 to an armed robbery change in the state of Wisconsin (Del & Trulson, 2006). Scarpelli was sentenced to 15 years in prison.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The landmark U.S. Supreme Court case I have chosen to write about is Miranda v. Arizona. This was a case in Arizona where Mr. Miranda was arrested at his home and taken by police into custody to a police station where he was then identified by a complaining witness. Once, he was identified he was interrogated by two police officers for about two hours and as a result to this long interrogation he signed a written confession to the crime. Therefore, once the case went to trial his oral and written confessions were read to the jury. He was then found guilty of kidnapping as well as rape and sentence to 20-30 years’ imprisonment on each count (uscourt.gov. com.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I do not believe that Jones has a chance of winning his appeal against the city of San Francisco for approaching people and asking them for money because I do not believe that Jones' First Amendment right was necessarily violated when he was arrested for it. From what I understand, Jones was arrested for accosting people. For me, the key word in this case is “accosting,” which according to Merriam Webster dictionary means, “to approach and speak to (someone) often in an angry, aggressive, or unwanted way.” According to this case, that is what Jones was doing and that is why he was arrested; not necessarily for the act of soliciting money itself but for approaching people aggressively and unwantedly.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Rehnquist was born on Oct 1, 1924 in Milwaukee, WI to his parents William and Margery Rehnquist. From an early age he embraced his family’s respect towards Republican Party leaders such as Herbert Hoover and Robert Taft (Biography, 2005). After graduating high school, Rehnquist attended Kenyon College for one year before entering the Army Air Corps during World War II from 1943 to 1946. Upon completion of his military service, he attended the University of Stanford where he earned a bachelor’s of arts degree and a master’s degree in political science.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The verdict is over turned three times because of prosecution misconduct. The police admit to perjury, evidence mishandling and an unsecure crime-scene. The defense proved than evidence was not secured or protected to ensure that it was not corrupted or lost. Williams’ defense proved misconduct three times and still the jury convicted Williams. Only after three mistrials was the case moved to Augusta, and a verdict of not guilty…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The first eleven amendments were written in the Constitution on September seventeenth in seventeen eighty-seven by James Madison. The first amendment included the freedom of speech. Even though James Madison wrote the first amendment, he was not the individual that came up with it. “Jefferson was concerned with the right to exercise religious freedom, freedom of speech and press” (who wrote). Thomas Jefferson who was his mentor, persuaded James Madison to include freedom of speech in an amendment in the constitution (who wrote).…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda vs Arizona By Bryan Lundgren In this project, I will find out some of the background, information, and the decision behind the Miranda vs. Arizona Supreme Court Case in 1966. I think before I go into the Supreme Court case and decision, I think it is important to know the reason why the case made it to the Supreme Court in the first place.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book “Ordinary Injustice” by Amy Bach, chapter four titled “Show Trial”, describes a number of different cases showing wrongful convictions being processed through the criminal justice system based off of false confessions. In Chicago, there was a nine-year-old girl named Lisa Cabassa was found raped and killed in the back of an alley a couple miles from her home. Two months after the rape and murder of Lisa, a witness named Judy called the police to give her testimony on the crime. Her statement consisted of her telling the police the people involved with the crime were named Michael Evans and Paul Terry, whom were teenagers from the neighborhood. She spotted them with Lisa that night.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stolen Valor Case Study

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this Supreme Court Abel Fields is found not guilty. In 2011, 39 year old Fields was convicted in California for falsely speaking of serving in the military for eight years and receiving a Purple Heart. He was in violation of the Stolen Valor act. The Stolen Valor act protects the veterans who receive a Purple Heart after being wounded in war. In his previous ruling he was found guilty.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Brief #1 I. The court case of Clarett v. National Football League, 369 F.3d 124 (2004) was held in the U.S. states court of appeals for the second circuit, which is at the state level. II. Previously, with this case, the NFL was appealed at the Southern district court in New York, giving a result in favor in Clarett’s claims and arguments. However, later on, the eligibility rules were deemed “safe” from antitrust laws due to the non-statutory labor exemption laws.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This was one of those cases that made me sick to my stomach, just the fact that an innocent child lost her life before she even start living. What’s more for one how religious was Williams to kill a child, sad. The grief those parent must have went through by losing a child goes beyond words. I am glad the officer did strike up a conversation with him so he could tell where the child remain were and they could have some type of closure. Another thing, I hope he spend the remaining years of his life behind bar, and the guilt of his crime eats away…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Fitness Testing Violations

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Initially in Brewer v. Williams, the Court ruled that the evidence was (Power’s body) had been obtained illegally because Williams's attorney had not been present during the interrogation that led to his admission. Several years later in Nix v. Williams the court reversed itself, ruling that the evidence was admissible because the body would eventually (“inevitably”) been found by lawful means”…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1966, the Miranda Rights were established, and the police interrogation and trialing system were changed forever. Following the case of Miranda v Arizona, in which Ernesto Miranda, who was arrested on the charges of robbery, kidnapping and rape, confessed during the interrogation period, but only due to alleged intimidation tactics used by police forces. While the trial was thrown out and retried, convicting Miranda rightfully of the charges for which he confessed, the change to read out the rights each person has while being arrested gives the detainee more rights and leverage against possible police interrogation. The results of the Escobedo v Illinois trial added to the Miranda Rights change by giving them freedom to counsel being…

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Revisiting Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd Introduction The case Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd (Williams v Roffey) has a significant influence on the development of the law of contract regarding the consideration of existing duty. This case is a decision of the Court of Appeal. There are three judges namely Glidewell, Rusell, and Purchas LJJ.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays