The role of radiosurgery in brain metastasis has simplified the overall management of patients with brain metastasis with an improvement in overall survival and quality of life (24, 25). Despite the advances in planning and application of radiation therapy, its side effects cannot be overemphasized. There is a significant damage to surrounding normal brain parenchyma following radiation therapy, which is usually grouped as adverse radiation effects (AREs) (26-28). The incidence of AREs after SRS is low with a 1-year cumulative incidence of 13%-14% in the literature (29). In a heterogeneous group of SRS-treated cerebral metastases, the incidence of RN ranged between 1.4% and 24% (30-32). The huge variation in the incidence of AREs can be attributed to widely varied SRS protocols. Moreover, the risk of AREs increases with increasing size and volume of the tumor (28). Radiation necrosis (RN) is one of the AREs that is often difficult to manage because of the ambiguity in diagnosis and treatment
The role of radiosurgery in brain metastasis has simplified the overall management of patients with brain metastasis with an improvement in overall survival and quality of life (24, 25). Despite the advances in planning and application of radiation therapy, its side effects cannot be overemphasized. There is a significant damage to surrounding normal brain parenchyma following radiation therapy, which is usually grouped as adverse radiation effects (AREs) (26-28). The incidence of AREs after SRS is low with a 1-year cumulative incidence of 13%-14% in the literature (29). In a heterogeneous group of SRS-treated cerebral metastases, the incidence of RN ranged between 1.4% and 24% (30-32). The huge variation in the incidence of AREs can be attributed to widely varied SRS protocols. Moreover, the risk of AREs increases with increasing size and volume of the tumor (28). Radiation necrosis (RN) is one of the AREs that is often difficult to manage because of the ambiguity in diagnosis and treatment