For example, the antagonists in the story made him fight blindfolded. In the Book Invisible Criticism: Ralph Ellison and the American Canon, the author elaborates on the meaning explaining that, “the invisible man’s invisibility is a function of blindness, and the novel is full of images of distorted vision, blindfolds, and other forms of sightlessness” (Nadel, 35). When the narrator’s tormentors made him fight blindfolded, it not only provoked violence, but it also displayed the extent of the deception. Even today there still lies tension between races as a result of the “invisibility” of certain groups. The narrator was invisible was being ostracized because the color of his skin tone. Throughout the events, the battle gets more intense and the grueling men thought it was perfectly fine to torture him. The fact that they were invisible did not fall as a fault to the victims, but the men conducting this “program” were consciously ignoring them. The men equated the values of these victims of their own property and treated them like animals. The men that conducted the battle not only distorted the definition of civility, but they destroyed the ideology of what it means to be
For example, the antagonists in the story made him fight blindfolded. In the Book Invisible Criticism: Ralph Ellison and the American Canon, the author elaborates on the meaning explaining that, “the invisible man’s invisibility is a function of blindness, and the novel is full of images of distorted vision, blindfolds, and other forms of sightlessness” (Nadel, 35). When the narrator’s tormentors made him fight blindfolded, it not only provoked violence, but it also displayed the extent of the deception. Even today there still lies tension between races as a result of the “invisibility” of certain groups. The narrator was invisible was being ostracized because the color of his skin tone. Throughout the events, the battle gets more intense and the grueling men thought it was perfectly fine to torture him. The fact that they were invisible did not fall as a fault to the victims, but the men conducting this “program” were consciously ignoring them. The men equated the values of these victims of their own property and treated them like animals. The men that conducted the battle not only distorted the definition of civility, but they destroyed the ideology of what it means to be