Racially Based Jury Nullification Summary

Improved Essays
Introduction
The article Racially Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice system was written in December, 1995 in a Yale Law Journal by Paul Butler, and than later republished in 2015 in Introduction to Legal Studies. This article was published in North America, for academics in law stream, or anyone with an interest in law. The author poses different views on the racism in todays court rooms faced by African American, particularly by the men. In this essay, I will be analyzing this case from the perspective of white girl so I really can’t say shit on the subject.
Summary of Article
Paul Butler is an African American lawyer whom practiced as prosecutor (2) specializing in white collar criminal defense and civil litigation
…show more content…
Butler uses cases and his own analysis of different outlooks on law to conduct his analysis. Butlers main arguments pertain to liberal critique and radical critique. The liberal critique is that the criminal justice system is controlled by white people, thus is inherently racist, not necessarily on purpose, but through the white supremacy that is throughout our culture (1). He than goes into the problems of this critique, such as how it does not explain the gap between violent black and white crimes. The radical critique illustrates that the law is racist because it is made by white people to protect their interests, with no regard to the effects it will have on the black community (1). This argument means that when black criminals are locked up, it is because white people created the situation that brought him to that point. Butler believes that the rule of law is a myth. The rule of law is that “any result can be derived from the pre-existing legal doctrine” (1), which basically means that law has the inability to be neutral. This is in relation to jury nullification, which means jurors acquit criminal defendants who are technically guilty, but who do not deserve punishment. He then relates this practice to the slaver in the south making the point that African Americans did not deserve the slavery they were subjected too. White jurors have been known to not apply different laws in history to save African Americans because they felt they did not deserve the punishment. He makes the point that they are not judging the law as much as they are refusing to apply it to members of their own race. He makes sure to issue the point that thus may not always benefit African American citizens

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In 1964, a giant step was taken by the people of America. Segregation was abolished and the hope for racial equality, in all senses, was high. Unfortunately, this giant step toward equality was not enough to actually get there. Many people of color face injustice to this day and biases based on the color of a person’s skin often determine where they end up in life. Walter Dean Myers writes about a 16-year old boy named Steve Harmon who is on trial for murder.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Historically, America has been predisposed towards racism against African-Americans. However, Americans, for the past century, have effectively ignored the issues with race that the American society still faces in the criminal justice system. In his TED Talk entitled “We need to talk about an injustice,” Bryan Stevenson addresses the issues with the American criminal justice system by detailing the problems and showing the important role the citizens of American can play. Although the topic is a serious one, Stevenson discusses the issues with elegance and carefulness and is able to effectively persuade his audience. Before delving into the information that Stevenson provides in his speech, it is essential to evaluate the setting that Stevenson…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Author of Chokehold: Policing Black Men, Paul Butler is a former federal prosecutor, a current law professor at Georgetown University Law Center, and author. He works mostly in the field of race and jury nullification and is a leading scholar in those areas. Born in Chicago on January 15, 1961, Butler knew from a young age he wanted to work in the criminal law field. He graduated from both Yale and Harvard University. He has won the Harry Chapin Media Award, and his writing has been published in the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and Boston Globe.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sandoval, the final path for the challenging of racial discrimination within the criminal justice system was revoked. This groundbreaking case substantially protected the justice system from all allegations of racial biased. Once again, the courts have failed African Americans and minority citizens as a whole. Michelle Alexander raises the argument by excessively detaining African American men, America is removing them from major obligations including, fatherhood.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The criminal justice system in the United States has increasingly targeted people of color, more specifically African Americans, for crimes that they may have not committed. A huge number of incarcerated African Americans have been wrongfully convicted within the past 20 years. Through the creation of the national police force in 1893, African Americans have had a target on their back. Ever since the establishment of Jim Crows Laws in the 1890s through “separate but equal,” racism has been prominent in society. Through systematic racism, many Americans assume that Africans Americans are more likely to be engaging in criminal activity.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The New Jim Crow Summary

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Book review: The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander In the book, the New Jim Crow, Alexander Michelle gives a descriptive information of how the American government is set up to put down the Black community. She argues that the current system is just a successor of the other past system of slavery. For each chapter, the author makes detailed explanations of her points. With subtitles, she is able to touch on every component within her topics.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It gave me a slight insight as to why attorneys act the way they do at times, although this is not an excuse to be blindly racist. Next, the fact that attorneys are completely aware of the shortcomings of the criminal justice system are described. This was infuriating. Gonzalez Van Cleve conducted interviews with attorneys and directly asked them to reflect on the criminal justice system and to describe any faults they felt were present. Attorneys blatantly stated that the system in place is not working and in need of a reform.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paul is a black man who raised up in poor family and cum laude the Yale College and Harvard Law School. Now is professor in the Law and powerful prosecutor who have experience to be accused as a criminal. He is falsely accused of assaulting female neighbor “Detroit" and has been arrested; because of fighting for his parking space. (pg.8-14) During his trial as a criminal, Paul learn some important lessons about the justice system in which he works for.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once arrested, blacks are likely to remain in the prison. They are harshly treated, sometimes even for crimes not properly investigated and crimes they did not commit. The biggest crimes in the United States criminal Justice system is that it is a race-based, institution where African American are directly targeted and punished in a much more aggressive way than white people. Without question racism is still extremely present, fixed in a society that fails to understand it and buried in a badly damaged judicial system. An analysis of black history reveals that blacks often serve higher sentences than whites for the same crime because of inequalities such as racial profiling, bias in police department across the country and unfair criminal justice…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The key topic that is under debate throughout this paper is jury nullification and how its procedures work within the justice system, as well as some of its strengths and weaknesses. There is quite a bit of controversy surrounding jury nullification being used as a primary rectification in the justice system as it tends to make equal outcomes become unequal outcomes. Jury nullification is a process in which a jury reaches a verdict of not guilty despite the fact that the defendant is actually guilty of the actions he or she is being charged for. The jury nullifies a law that is believed to be immorally wrong or wrongfully applied to the defendant.…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many controversial issues in the United States criminal justice system. In recent years, the contentious issue of ethnic discrimination has been in the forefront of several trials. There are some individuals who believe that jury nullification should be used by minorities on juries to acquit defendants of color. Jury nullification is defined as a process where a jury acquits a defendant, even though the members of the jury believe the defendant is guilty of the charges. The concept is that the system is biased toward the ethnic majority and nullification can be used to balance the system for minorities.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    IV. For Nullification Based on the tacit allowance of jury nullification that is present today, and the stated allowance of it in death penalty cases, jury nullification should be brought out of the darkness and instated as a right in trials. The benefits of jury nullification are clear, and include the fact that juries can respond to unanticipated circumstances in the moment that laws cannot and that they can look at exigent circumstances and choose to grant a defendant freedom when those circumstances are clear. There are three main ways that nullification should be made known and legal.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This paper is going to explore the complex issues involving law enforcement’s often unfair treatment of African Americans and the effects it has. My intention is to explore the unfair application of laws, arrest and incarcerations rates, and sentencing disparities between races. Racial disparities have recently been thrust into the spotlight in the United States after a series of controversial instances where the African American community felt that justice was not served and that the justice system itself was biased against them. Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner, and Michael Brown chief among these cases.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Criminal Justice System Is Racist In 2010 the U.S. Sentencing Commission reported that African-Americans received 10% longer sentences than whites through the federal system for the same crimes (11 Facts About Racial Discrimination). The criminal justice system has created and perpetuated a racial hierarchy in the United States. Some Americans are unaware of mass incarceration numbers and racism that occurs in the criminal justice system. Also, African-Americans are criminalized and targeted because of their skin color. It is easy to see that the Criminal Justice System is racist and biased because of high minority incarceration rates, several instances of racial discrimination, and a lack of juries that include minority "peers."…

    • 1811 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    I have shown that due to the fact of skin color, one is more likely to be pulled over and serve a longer sentence than that of a non-Hispanic White man. I have shown there is inequality structured within the structure. I have broken it down into three separate races describing what they are most convicted for, how long they are sentenced, and how long they serve their sentence. Racial inequality does exist. This inequality stems from the time of slavery when diversity was not accepted.…

    • 2223 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Brilliant Essays