Racial Profiling Should Be Allowed When National Security Essay

1491 Words Dec 7th, 2015 6 Pages
Since the Jim Crow era in 1877, the majority of the United States have been racially profiled based off their ethnicity. Proponents state that racial profiling should be allowed when national security is of the utmost importance. Yet only 32 states require no mandatory evidence for stops and searches. Therefore, approximately 36% of the country have banned any form of racial profiling (Malkin). A person should not have their characteristics and identity be determined on whether they engage in illegal activity or not.
Racial profiling is the act of suspecting or targeting a person of a certain race based on a stereotype about their race. According to Wikipedia, the existence of profiling dates all the way back to slavery in 1693. The practice continued through the Jim Crow era and is now present in the twenty-first century. Now Philadelphia’s court officials gave police legal authority to stop and detain any African seen wandering around on the streets. In her article The Roots of Racial Profiling, researcher and genealogist Anita L.Willis suggests, “Racial profiling, for want of a better term, is a Gateway Act -- an excuse used to approach citizens assumed to be criminals” (Willis). This discriminatory practice continued through the Jim Crow era and now in the twenty-first century, racial profiling has been alleged to be prevalent across cities in the U.S.
In 1996, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in U.S. v. Armstrong that racial profiling is constitutional in the absence of…

Related Documents