R V Anthony Cook Case Study

Improved Essays
The case R. V. Anthony - Cook took place back on February 9th , 2013 when the accused Anthony Cook got into a fight with Michael Gregory outside a drop-in clinic in Vancouver. The center was open to people who were facing addiction and mental health issues, both of the men had past issues with mental illness and substance abuse. On the day of the crime Michael Gregory, who, was volunteering at the center was punched twice each hitting him in the head and knocking him over, Gregory then fell into unconsciousness when he hit the pavement and suffered a fatal skull fracture. Cooks then fled the scene and was arrested a couple hours later, he was sent to a mental intuition for two months, after which he was released and was then charged with manslaughter and pleaded not guilty. After he was released on bail and given certain conditions such has having to live in a mental health facility and placed on curfew. Once Cooks missed his curfew his bail was revoked and was re-arrested and held in custody for 11 months until his hearing. …show more content…
A joint submission is when the crown and the defense counsel both agree upon a recommendation of a sentence to the trial judge and in exchange for both parties agreeing, the accused must plead guilty. Cooks was given another 18 months in custody for agreeing to the joint submission with, the addition of the 11 months he already spent from pretrial and wasn't given probation. Following the plea agreement Cooks was unhappy about not receiving time credited and probation, his lawyers then appealed the case to the British court of appeal in which the appeal was denied. Judge Ehrcke presiding over the appeal wanted to throw out the joint submission and give Anthony Cooks a longer sentence which included prohibition. Even though it was against Cooks medical supervision judge Ehrcke imposed a longer in custody sentence and three year's

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    R V Mabior Case Summary

    • 3451 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Facts of the Case On October 5, 2012, the case of R v. Mabior was taken to the Supreme Court of Canada; her Majesty the Queen is the appellant, and Clato Lual Mabior, the respondent. As well, nonparties known as the interveners are of grave importance to this imperative matter. There were a total of twelve interveners, including: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network and HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario, just to name a few (see Appendix A for full list).…

    • 3451 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R. V. Sparrow Case Study

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    R. v. Sparrow is the most famous case in Canadian history, it helped to set up the foundations for future cases involving Aboriginal fishing rights. In the court Sparrow was charged with “fishing with net longer than permitted by band's Indian food, fishing licence - Indian right to fish for food constituting existing aboriginal rights protected by s. 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 ” (1990 CarswellBC 105), the government forced aboriginals to start getting fishing licenses. This was conflicted by s. 31 of the Constitution Act, which states that aboriginals do not need a fishing license to fish on-season and off-season. But new laws required that everyone needs a fishing license in order to fish. The new laws also banned someway that aboriginals fished such as the use of drift nets which Sparrow was using during the time that he was caught.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He then filed for a writ of Habeas Corpus in Florida’s supreme court which promptly denied his petition. Failing the initial…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1998, Hugh Caperton filed a lawsuit against A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc and was found liable for $50 million in damages in a state trial court in West Virginia. Prior to the hearing, Caperton motioned for the presiding justice in the case, Brent Benjamin, to recuse himself, seeing as though Massey’s C.E.O. had donated nearly $3 million dollars to Benjamin’s campaign. In 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Benjamin’s failure to recuse himself, seeing as he had a personal connection to one of the parties in the case, was a direct violation of the Due Process Clause stated in the fourth teeth amendment (CAPERTON v. A.T. MASSEY COAL CO., INC.). The Caperton v. Massey case proposed the question, “how much power and impact does election campaigning have on judicial bias. Should state judges be appointed over elected?”…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Robert versus Boston- Robert v. Boston challenged the separation of schools based on the color of their skin (nps.com). In 1848, a year old girl named Sarah Roberts was stopped from going to that school because she was black. Her dad Benjamin pressed charges against the city. The lawsuit was a effort by the black community to end segregated schools.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “State of Oregon v. Kipland Philip Kinkel,” the defendant is appealing his sentence of 111 years and eight months. The defendant was charged and pled guilty to four counts of murder and twenty-six attempted counts of murder, in 1998. During the sentence hearing, the defendant claimed that his actions were caused by a mental disease, and that this…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Gonzales Case Study

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    R v. Gonzales refers to a criminal case of a triple parricide by twenty year old Australian BOS: 28744455 Sef Gonzales which occurred on the 10th of July 2001. Sef’s motives for killing his father Teddy, Mother Mary Loiva and sister Clodine derived from his parent’s unattainable high expectations of him and his desire to financially benefit from their death. Having premeditated his crime, Sef entered Clodine’s room at 4pm armed with two kitchen knifes and a baseball bat and killed her. The cause of her death was the combined effect of the compression of her neck, the blunt force injuries and abdominal stab wounds. Sef’s mother arrived home an hour later and was ambushed in the living room by Sef, stabbing her multiple times, severing her windpipe.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Baker v Carr, the majority made up the basis for asserting jurisdiction because the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, did not give it the power to do so. The Constitution never mentioned anything regarding state election procedure, other than that it could not hinder any legal rights of its citizens as mentioned in the Constitution and that the number of representatives per state were to be determined by state population. Therefore, the Constitution never mentioned that federal courts had the jurisdiction to hear constitutional questions to regarding state elections; the majority simply made that up in order to hear the case. There is no branch of federal government that specializes in redistricting. Since representatives' political…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 1980 court case, Armstrong V. Kline, drew from parents of children with exceptionalities becoming upset with the education system’s 180-day school year rule1. Beginning in January of 1980, they decided that enough was enough and they needed to do something before summer vacation came so, their child/children would not lose everything they learned during the school year1. The parents took on the court case, filing three class action lawsuits, all of which were against Caryl Kline, the secretary of education and chief official of the Department of Education1. The result of this particular case relieved me but, the fact it had to become a court case, I found to be absolutely ridiculous. Also, the terminology they used while describing the…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Cannon Case Summary

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the evening of July 15, 2003, Cole Cannon went to the home of Evan Miller to make a drug deal with Millers mother (Miller v. Alabama, 2012). Evan Miller and his co-defendant Colby Smith followed Cannon back to his own trailer where all three of them smoked marijuana and played drinking games. After a while Cannon passed out and Miller stole Cannon’s wallet. Miller and Smith split $300.00 between them (Miller v. Alabama, 2012).…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case I: Giroie v. Montgomery (1030-1093, France): This case could exist under a mixture of law systems and mentalities. If the case was to interpreted as occurring after 1080, elements of Corpus Iuris Civilis, Justinian 's rediscovered law codes could come into play. Given the prevalence of vendetta and the ordeal, however, this is unlikely. This case is primarily viewed through the lens of Germanic “barbaric” law, since the deeds are viewed as private wrongs, rather than public crimes, as”the laws of the barbarian codes contain very little in the way of public or constitutional law [...] and are overwhelmingly private law” (Shaffern 103).…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mason V. R & G Case Study

    • 1278 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Contract One of the major contention points in this case of Mason v. R&G is the question whether a contract exists at all between the parties. In order to ascertain the validity of the contract, the elements of a valid contract in the state of Georgia must be carefully examined. The Code of Georgia, § 13-3-1, clearly states that in order to constitute a valid contract, the following elements must generally exist; there must be parties able to contract, a consideration moving to the contract, the assent of the parties to the terms of the contract, and a subject matter upon which the contract can operate.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Perry Case

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After participating in and reviewing the Q.B trial R v. Perry & Manitoba in regards to the role of the investigator, and the physical evidence that was implemented in the trial, four individual pieces of physical evidence were introduced to the court by the investigator (cite). These four pieces of evidence consist of, a black wallet that was found on Matlock Manitoba, a time X watch found on Mason Perry, and a knife and a replica firearm found in a dumpster, in the back ally where Mason Perry and Matlock Manitoba were arrested. In relation to the introduction of evidence, the wallet, and Time X watch that supposedly belonged to Monty Hall was first introduced into court by the Crown during the testimony of Monty Hall, stating that his black wallet and Time X watch was stolen from him during the robbery. Additionally, they were shown to Hall asking how both compared to the ones that were stolen, then entered them into court as exhibit one and two. The physical evidence was then brought up once again when Constable York started his testimony, adding that Manitoba was in possession of the wallet and Perry of the Time X watch when found hiding in a bush within the back ally.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    R V Mulvihill Case Study

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    LEGAL CITATION R v Mulvihill [2014] NSWSC 443, 16 April 2014, Fullerton J ELEMENTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CRIME ELEMENTS- Murder – Section 18 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) • Actus rea – An act or omission causing death. • Mens rea – Recklessly indifference to human life, or intention to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lifeboat Dilemma There were several issues involving ethics in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens case. The case facts are subject to a major ethical issue involving whether it is ethical to kill a man to save three. Some would argue that when given a situation where at least one person will die, we should try to save as many human lives as possible. Others should state that the value of human life is immeasurable. Who are we to decide if one life is equal to another?…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays