Quigley The Ruses For War Summary

Improved Essays
As an international relations and global studies major, it is safe to assume that cultures, economy, and regional differences have always piqued my curiosity. However, my interest in the multinational thought process has always been on the lighter side of global issues, including world news, economy, and basic politics. I had never ventured into the graver side of things: wars. After reading the preface, I had a good idea of what the author’s purpose of writing The Ruses for War: American Intervention Since World War II. The title in and of itself disclosed his position on intervention. Father into the preface, Quigley reveals that his aim is to bring awareness that the reasons present to the public for waging war are often not the true reasons. Quigley goes on to say that in order for democracy to work the president should not be able to deceive us. If the public is deceived by the president, we will never see when an administration is not working and can not properly assess the situation. I agree with Quigley’s statement that citizens have the right to be informed about military actions; however, America is not just a democracy, but in fact a representative democracy; this means we elect officials (by majority consensus aka democracy) to represent us in government by voting how the majority of their constituents feel. The first chapter …show more content…
I completed in Lincoln Douglas debate throughout high school and many prompts could easily be linked back to when it is and isn’t moral for one country’s government to intervene in other countries personal matters. However, I enrolled in this class with an open mind and for good reason. All of the information I have used to reach the conclusion I have are based on articles released by the media and the press. All of the ‘facts’ I have used to build my opinions on are is an accumulation of biases and fragments of the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The novel The Wars by Timothy Findley presents the reader with many normative assumptions that can be recognized as troubling. From the passage above an example of this would be masculinity and heroism. The reader learns that when Robert is in the brothel, his curiosity brings him to observing Taffler having sex with another man (Findley, 42-43). After what Robert has seen he is left distraught, because he decided Taffler is the person he wants as a mentor. However, this then challenges Roberts’s understanding on what it means to be masculine and a hero but living a promiscuous…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philip Caputo’s A Rumor of War tells the story of a man’s demoralization during the Vietnam war and how it is associated with a refusal to any direct guilt for his own actions in that war. Throughout the book, you can sense the murderousness that comes from Caputo due to several reasons. Although, at the end of the book, he does not confess this murderousness urge that he experienced during his time in Vietnam. Overall, I believe that Philip Caputo was able to prove that he is not guilty and that he is a victim to the U.S. government and the U.S. military as well as the environment of Vietnam, and the relentlessness of combat training. Coming straight out of his own mouth, Caputo was able to prove compelling evidence that these forces developed…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Beck, Roger B., and Linda Black. McDougal Littell Modern World History: Patterns of Interaction Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell, 2003. Print. The Textbook by Roger B. Beck and Linda Black, describes how China became more modern after the death of Mao and Zhao had past away.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The overarching theme of chapter 4 was to demonstrating the historical past of American Foreign Policy and how and what leaders and events lead the shaping of policy to what we see it as today. In addition to, that war is can be broken down into three alternative factors/components political, military, and economy all effect each other and war in different aspects. While all the matter stressing the notion that each specific foreign event should be handle not by past presidents, but by a detailed investigation of the details presented. This year’s presidential election is one that hands what our soon to be president with a full plate of foreign affairs to handle. Being tied down in Syria, tension raising with Russia but the one issue that…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Appleman Williams’ essay The Tragedy of American Diplomacy centers around America expansion, and the idealistic and economic motivators which inspired it. Williams frames his narrative with his critique of the idea that expansion was one of the main ways in which America could extend its virtues throughout the world, and create a new era of peace. He decides the true tragedy of American diplomacy is that actions undertaken in the name of humanitarianism, self determination, and peace actually work in opposition to those ideals and instead turn the United States into an oppressive force abroad. While the United States may have desired to help others, they believed the only way they could do so was if they maintained authority over the nations they helped. The reason this occurred, Williams argues, is because expansionism has a large role in American mythos but both policy makers and citizens refuse to reconcile expansion with the idea of becoming an empire.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Runaway General What happened? In June 22, 2010 Rolling Stone magazine published an article in which McChrystal and his staff made disparaging remarks about US foreign policy about U.S. officials including Vice President J. Biden. Despite the fact that general McChrystal immediately apologized for the article, the scandalous publication reached the POTUS office. On June 2010, General McChrystal had to resign.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The dissonance between one’s duty to one’s country and the realization that the United State’s involvement…

    • 1299 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    2 At the peak of the 20th century, political turmoil between the major powers of the world resulted into one of the most significant and devastating periods of the 20th century. The Second World War, also known as World War 2, was a global war that erupted as a result of tensions between global powers. “The war was in many respects a continuation after an uneasy 20 year hiatus of disputes left unsettled by the First World War” (Encyclopaedia Britannica, World War II). The Second World War included the “vast majority of the world’s nations” (Encyclopaedia Britannica, World War II) – inevitably fabricating two adverse military alliances- the Allies and Axis. “The principal belligerents” were the Axis powers—Germany, Italy, and Japan—and the Allies—France,…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Douglas Fiasco Summary

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fiasco does many things, but it also misses many marks—important marks. Done well is the characterization of the decision as ill-informed. It also berates conflict, and for good reasons. We know, however; that it is markedly easy to levy criticisms in light of knowledge attained since. More difficult is showing how, in the context of the time that better decisions might have been made.…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Attributing ‘new wars’ to be determined by asymmetry as the most important feature provides suitable parameters of war which constitutes a ‘new war’ as the environment of war shifts as Clausewitz identifies but also the actors. As concluded, the lines of war are becoming much more blurred than in previous centuries due to close alliances between mercenaries and bandits. In addition, Münkler recognizes that similarities can be drawn from wars of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. He has brought together key elements from the wider literature of Political Violence and Terror referencing key theorists and attributing varied theories to Asymmetry with a wide range of aspects: technology, economics, motivations and ideology. Asymmetry provides an umbrella theme of ‘new war’.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All Christians must believe that drinking any alcohol is a sin because the Bible says so! All Christians must believe that the Earth was created in a literal six-day period because the Bible says so! All Christians must believe that shouldn’t get tattoos because the Bible says so! The problem is that many Christians do believe the opposite of these statements, but how? The reason for this is all on interpretation.…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Liberalism In Iraq

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nick Sherman Professor Asal Political science 102 9/27/16 In the wake of 9/11 The United States, The United Kingdom, and many other nations formed a coalition against the Ba’athist regime of Saddam Hussein. The coalition force invaded in 2003 to overthrow Saddam’s dictatorship and establish a democratic state in the Middle East. Although in some instances realism can describe the invasion of Iraq, the theory of Liberalism best describes the invasion because of liberal notions such as collective security and the belief that cooperation can lead to beneficial outcomes to all involved.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Historians and International Relations scholars have long had a relationship that allows for interworking, while distinct differences still remain separating the two. In studying the past, a historian and an international relations scholar would take into account the past as a force that generates the questions and theories of both parties. On the other hand, there lies a difference in the way that the historian would place more emphasis on recounting history and international events for their own sake. The IR scholars would contrastingly use historical events as ways to additionally supporting or discrediting a theoretical hypothesis they have proposed. In this way, their differences in methodology and objectives can be highlighted.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Opportunity cost of war, diminishing resources, and inter-state trade are important factors when states deliberate going to war. “International commerce, being a transaction between nations, could conceivably also have a direct impact on the likelihood of peace and war: once again the [economic] interests might overcome the passions, specifically the passion for conquest” (Gartzke 394). This quote by Hirschman in 1977 explains the impact the global economy has on war – it can keep it from happening. The opportunity cost of war, or what you give up to be able to afford war is something that states have been dealing with as long as there has been war. But in the age of globalization, the opportunity costs have never been higher.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, a huge number of literature and institutions focusing on IR have appeared since World War One. (Wright, 1995) This was the beginning of disciplinary study of international relations. Since then, IR has been successfully establishing its position in academic society, and its development has been traditionally seen as a “response to events/changes in the real world” (Brown and Ainley 2009: 19). For instance, “liberal institutionalism” appeared as a response to World War One, but soon after it was challenged and replaced by “realism”, which emerged, mainly because the former failed to explain the cause of uninterrupted aggressions by Germany, Italy and Japan.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays