Stare Decisis: Legal Rule

Great Essays
Stare decisis is a doctrine or strategy of subsequent regulations or principles laid down in previous legal decisions. It is the explanation that maintains that previous decisions which are to be followed by the courts. This strategy dictates that the court must abide or adhere to decided cases. Stare decisis is a legal rule which dictates that courts cannot disrespect the standard.
The court must endorse prior decisions. In essence, this legal principle dictates that once a law has been determined by the appellate court (which hears and determines appeals from the decisions of the trial courts) to be relevant to the facts of the case, future cases will follow the same principle of law if they involve considerably identical facts. Stare decisis
…show more content…
When applying the law to the facts of a particular case. The three common forms of reasoning are deductive reasoning, Linear reasoning, and Reasoning by analogy.
Deductive reasoning: Deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion is based on the concordance of multiple grounds that are generally assumed to be true. Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as top-down logic. Its equivalent, inductive reasoning, is sometimes referred to as bottom-up logic. Deductive reasoning is a basic form of valid reasoning. Deductive reasoning, or deduction, starts out with a general statement, or hypothesis, and examines the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion
Linear reasoning: it’s a form of legal reasoning that is generally in use might be thought of as ‘Linear’ reasoning because its proceeds from one point to another, with the final point being the
…show more content…
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Supreme Court Justice from 1902 to 1932, and active Chief Justice of the U.S. in 1930, wrote, “The life of the law has not been logic, it has been experience.” Certainly, realists disagree that the law is a scientific endeavor, to which deductive reasoning may be applied to reach a decision. Realists also recognize that, because judges often make decisions based on their political affiliations, the law has a tendency to lag behind social realities.

Positivism
Positivists take the view that the only appropriate causes of legal consultant are laws, rules, and statutes that have been endorsed by a lawmaking entity, such as federal and state governments, courts of law, and other administrative bodies. Positivists hold that rules, regulations, and philosophies may be deliberated as “laws” because failure to obey them may end in prohibitions. Positivists declare that such issues as conviction and ethics are only things people strive for, and should not be used by a magistrate when making a

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This concept came about when cases or decisions became common knowledge. For example, in the English legal community, judges who had heard of similar cases may have treated cases alike or even establish some standard of offences. This is known as unwritten laws. Comparative to today 's judges and lawyers referring to earlier decisions to influence or gauge judges when reaching a verdict. Trial lawyers spend a large portion of their time presenting similar or identical cases in hopes of persuading the judge to reach a similar decision.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Review: The Common Place of Law The Common Place of Law is an interesting empirical research of legal consciousness that is actually a very strong logical theory, in which law is recognized as both constituting and being constituted by social relations and cultural practice. The question that Ewick and Silbey spawn their theory from comes from the classic question, “how is the law experienced” rather than “what is the law,” this was a very compellingly argument made by Ewick and Silbey. The latter question that I saw arise from their argument was from where did most of the classic legal theory and jurisprudence; and did they spring from the subset question “how is the law experienced”. Seeing that law is not something that only exist and can be studied, but law is created by the process of inquiry and definition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lawrence V. Wade

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Amanda Black Exam Essays Fall Quarter 12/5/2007 Scalia explains his dissenting opinion to the overturning of Lawrence v. Texas by comparing the case to Roe v. Wade in three areas. He looks at stare decisis, fundamental rights, and legal moralism. There are three things that need to be proven before the court can overrule a decision in regards to stare decisis. 1) Its foundations have been eroded by subsequent decisions; 2) it has been subject to substantial and continuing criticism; 3) it has not induced individual or social reliance that counsels against overturning it.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this model, judges act purely according to their own viewpoints, beliefs and preferences regardless of their court coworker’s reaction and response. For this reasons, this model of judicial behavior seems to lack theoretical consistency and reasoning. Judges’ policy preferences have a significant and possibly larger role in the judicial decisions making process (Ivers). Thus, legal considerations are also relevant in this process and cannot be ignored due to the fact that judges make decisions inside a legal framework.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Deductive reasoning is based on specific evidence in order to prove that an individual is guilty of an offence. Inductive reasoning, also called inductive logic, is reasoning that goes beyond what we actually know in order to make a conclusion. Deductive reasoning is done with actual evidence while inductive reasoning is based on a proposition. The textbook give a great example of inductive reasoning, “All of john Wayne Gacy’s victims found to date were male-so Gacy did not kill females”. It uses information that has been obtained in order to further solve the problem.…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drobner V. Lancet Case

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. The issue in this case is if the Drobner v. Peters case should be used as a precedent to dismiss the Woods v. Lancet case, that is whether or not an infant plaintiff could recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained in the mother’s womb during the ninth month of pregnancy resulting in serious injuries, permanently damaging the infant. Citing Drobner v. Peters, the Special Term granted the motion and dismissed the suit on the grounds that infant plaintiff’s failed to state a cause of action, thus taking the position that its allegations, though true, gave the infant no right to recover damages in the courts of New York. The defendant also claimed that there was no medical evidence that proved the plaintiff’s injuries resulted from her…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) Legal 2) Attitudinal 3) Strategic With the vague words of the constitution and these 3 models this is how the Supreme Court justices are to make decisions. 1) The legal aspect of the decision-making is strictly based on the facts, laws & precedent.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supreme Court justices do have personal views. They are appointed through a political process. Observers naturally must ask how great a role their political views actually play. Some scholars argue that the justices’ political preferences play a large role, essentially dictating their decisions in many cases. They point to the fact that justices appointed by conservative presidents tend to vote in a conservative fashion and those appointed by liberal presidents vote the opposite way.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Define the following 25 legal terms: 1.HIPAA Privacy Rule _Federal regulations created to implement the privacy requirements within the administrative simplification subtitle of HIPPA of 1996 and safeguard identifiable health information. ________________________ 2.HIPAA Security Rule _Federal regulations created to implement the security requirements within the administrative simplification subtitle of the HIPPA 1996 ________________________ 3.Medical malpractice __A type of action in which the plaintiff must demonstrate that a physician-patient, nurse-patient, therapist-patient, or other healthcare provider-patient relationship existed at the time of the alleged wrongful act.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Terms: Patronage – the ability to give an office or position to another; many Jeffersonian wanted positions to be transferred to them from the previous president’s cabinet, which Jefferson refused to do, despite differences in political party judicial review – established by Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, it is the belief that the Supreme Court has the right to judge the constitutionality of a situation, not any other branch. Impressment – the forceful enlistment of a person for service as a sailor; the British captured and impressed many American sailors to serve the king, where many died, leaving their families behind unwillingly economic coercion – to convince a nation to do something as a result to changing financial conditions; America…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stare decisis is the principle that past decisions made by the judicial system are applied to similar issues within the jurisdiction. In the case Griswold V. Connecticut the initial ruling was over turned by the Supreme Court, finding that Connecticut’s Laws on birth control were unconstitutional. The defendants were initially charged with accessories in the assistance of preventing conception. The Supreme Court reversed this ruling because married couples have the right to privacy, in which, they have the right to seek medical assistance to prevent conception. Roe V. Wade’s reversal was built on the precedent of Griswold V. Connecticut’s rights of privacy.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The legal principle that Chief Justice John Marshall declared in the Marbury vs. Madison was the principle of judicial review. Judicial review states that the Supreme Court has the right to “judge the constitutionality of federal laws.” As a result, to ensure a method of check and balances in the U.S. legal system, the Supreme Court has the authority to overrule the acts of the executive and legislative branches when their actions are not consistent with the U.S.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deductive reasoning is formal patterns are used to reveal the logic of our reasoning. These patterns give us a tool for “quality control” when the correct deductive form is followed, the reasoning is logical and the argument is called valid (Diestler 2012). As a critical thinker you have to start to realize that facts and observations are restricted. Sometimes when looking for evidence you have to be accepting to a certain viewing platform. When it comes to important decision-making the people in our lives’ that we embrace our relationships with.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deductive logic attempts to create valid reasoning that will make it “impossible for the inferences based upon these reasons to be false” (Popkin and Stroll, 239).This means that if reasons are given and if these reasons are valid and are deemed to be true then the inferences made are conclusive. To better understand this, one may further dissect the two forms of an argument. Deductive reasoning is one of the most basic forms of valid reasoning. A deductive syllogism typically begins with a general statement that is the hypothesis. This hypothesis is used to examine the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays