Moral Judgments: Good Or Bad?

Improved Essays
Metaethical Frameworks
Metaethics is a question of not what should we do but why should we do it. It breaks the idea down that you decision is based on good and bad. But what is good and bad? Who determines what is good and bad? Is it an idea from inside of a person or group of people? If you determine that what is right for you might be wrong for someone else, who is right? Everyone has their own internal moral code that decides right and wrong. There are several questions that metaethics asks. They include questions such as, what is the meaning of moral terms or even moral judgements, what is the nature of moral judgements and finally, how can someone support or defend a moral judgement? The first question discusses again the meaning of right, wrong, good or bad. The second question deals with whether moral judgements are universal or do the
…show more content…
Today, society has seen” the benefits” of living together and because of this change in perception, they have changed what they perceive as wrong and right when it comes to family living situations. This particular train of thought has extended to younger and older generations therefore showing that this type of moral thinking isn’t just a new idea but that people are more open to expressing their beliefs on this type of subject. This leads into the second question of whether this kind of moral behavior applies to society or just to the individual in question. In keeping with the above mentioned case study, society in general has deemed it ok to live together without being married, but a person might have a different opinion of the subject and because of that belief, what was wrong back then is still wrong today. This usually comes from an internal guidance system that was implied either by upbringing or from other outside influences. In the younger generation, peer pressure is a big motivator for how individuals tend to believe. If your friend or

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Ethics Midterm Paper

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Metaethics asks questions such as: what is morality? What is the nature of morality? Is it objective? Is it more of a preference, an opinion, or cultural convention? One way to understand metaethics is to test it using an ethical scenario.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Popenoe

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    David Popenoe and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead’s article “The State of our Unions” discusses data on marriage and divorce. It suggests that there is a cultural shift happening in America by using this information for support. In the data driven article, Popenoe and Whitehead claim that marriage rates are declining and, despite divorce rates being quite high, they are also on a steady decline. Alternatively, more people are participating in unmarried cohabitation before and in place of marriage.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Family Institution: Then and Now The purpose and understanding of the family institution has changed drastically since the Founders. The Founders associated marriage, specifically a stable one, with the sustainability of the family. Today marriage is less common, it happens later in life, and more of them end in divorce. Living together outside of wedlock was once prohibited, but now it is almost expected.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Week Two Written Responses Ethics: Approaching Moral Decisions According to Holmes the source of human rights is the scriptures in the Bible. There are many scriptures that show these human rights, and God also displays them by the way He treats everyone in the same manner throughout the Bible. As Christians we were born with human rights and Holmes explains this by stating, "Endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights" (Holmes, 1984, p. 89).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sociology Of Family Essay

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Family is very important to many people. But families have changed over the years. Divorce, remarriage and blended families are more common and accepted. There isn’t a stigma behind divorce or single parents as much anymore. Many young adults are even waiting till there marriage until they are in there 30s.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Debora Netcliff Professor Stanley English 100 19 October 2017 A Defense Of Moral Relativism Ethical relativism or Moral relativism is the proposition that what is considered moral or immoral or what is wrong or right depends on culture norms, and what behaviors is accepted in different societies in which a decision is made. Also what can be deemed as immoral or moral, bad may be good and ethical in another's society Many cultures differ in their moral practices. These moral and ethical decisions are also based off of inner judgments.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “How Not to Answer Moral Questions,” Regan asserts that moral truth is independent of one’s moral judgment, thus making moral truth a universal reality. In “Moral Isolationism,” Midgley argues that one can morally judge another culture if individual understanding is present. Despite their cohesive conclusions, there is not harmony between the two theories’ premises. Regan’s view on universal moral truth directly rejects Midgley’s idea that moral truth relies on a complete understanding behind the justification of another’s moral judgment. If moral questions were approached the way Regan believes they should be, the “isolating barriers” that Midgley criticized would not be within question, because morality is not relative or…

    • 1516 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marriage, what everyone used to assume is the the turning point of one’s life, has now become the not so common fantasies girls have. People’s perspectives on marriage and traditional family value have changed a lot. Dorian Solot, the author of “On Not Saying ‘I Do’”, explains her concerns and thoughts on the concept of not getting married for her whole life in her article. She argues that marriage is just what the society uses to judge a person’s status, not what this word used to stand for, love, for instance. Conversely, the author of “Five Non-religious Arguments for Marriage”, Dennis Prager contradicts Solot’s idea by providing five different reasons and benefits of getting married.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Wrinkle In Time Essay

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How do we determine what's right or wrong? How do we determine what’s good from evil? Good decisions made by good people can help prevail against the bad decisions. In the book A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’engle the characters are forced into situations where they must be able to conceive what is good from evil to interpret how to move on throughout their journey. Well, there are multitudinous ways that everyone thinks of to distinguish these two major categories, but the biggest influences that people use to consider their right from wrongs are the people around them, science, government, laws, and past experiences.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It’s no surprise that the American society views on marriage and family has shifted over the years. In the 1950’s marriage was looked at as a unity between two people and as time went on the meaning of marriage have changed. Marriage at one point was viewed as a holy matrimony that was taken seriously. The men were in the home and they provided for their family. The men were the protector of their home and made sure that their sons were taught the same.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Usual Morals Analysis

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are many theories that circulate about why criminals commit crimes. Rational choice theory is one of these theories in Criminology. To explain, rational choice theory is the belief that an individual thinks through their cost and benefits, and weight their Therefore, based on that, they make a choice (Lilly, 2012, pp. 362-363). In the movie The Usual Suspects, there is many instances where there is criminal’s activity is taking place.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Impartial Morals

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A. In my opinion, this article is impartial, because it is just a report of a crime, and do not have any emotional express. This article is telling about about the truth instead of a story, and it does not mention much about whether someone is right or not. First of all, the main part of the paragraph is the process of solving the Mystery of the Feet. In another word, the main character is not so important in this article.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When setting the criteria of right or wrong in daily lives, the theory of Moral Pluralism, which emphasizes on duty of a person to serve good, can…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Judgement Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral judgement is a process which defines what is wrong, right, ethical, unethical, moral, or immoral. Moral judgement can also be defined as an expression of preference, opinion, will and command of individuals (383). Tom Regan and Mary Midgley both discuss the importance of moral theory and their different ways one can or can’t answer moral questions. Tom Regan focuses on the relativism point of view by expressing four different ways on how not to answer moral questions. Moral relativism depends on culture, legality, religion, and historical symbolism.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays