Qtd's Argument Against Euthanasia

Improved Essays
“There is only one truly important philosophical problem, and that is suicide.” Qtd Euthanasia is the process of which a person with a terminal illness with no hope of surviving, can have their doctor give them something to kill them, instead of having to suffer for however long they have until they die. “In Michigan, for example, the state supreme court in 1920 upheld the murder conviction of a man who placed poison within reach of his wife, who was dying from multiple sclerosis.” (People v. Campbell) Qtd “Yet, 63 years later, in a case that never went to trial, a Michigan appellate court ignored this precedent and dismissed a murder charge against a man who gave a gun to a person who was talking of committing suicide and subsequently killed himself.” Qtd Admittedly, people would argue that it is not right and it could divide Christianity, because “in the words of the Old Testament, there is a time for everything under …show more content…
Additionally, in a way it is inhuman to let someone suffer from an illness that cannot be treated instead of letting them go. People put down animals when they get sick and it cannot be helped, but they will make a human suffer? There are three reasons why it should be legal, people have the right to death, euthanasia technically happens anyways, death is a private matter, so if no one else is being harmed it shouldn’t matter anyways if the person chooses to want it. Initially, Euthanasia should be legal because you have the right to death. “On the level of the individual, a classic lineage of thinkers from

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The term ‘euthanasia’ is a greek-derived word that developed a meaning over the course of time. According to history, the Greeks often referred to it as the “good death.” However, euthanasia was not an ordinary death, but rather it was a form of suicide. Individuals who were terminally ill would seek help from physicians to put them to death. In fact, an English philosopher, Francis Bacon, argued that this was one of the most phenomenal ways to have died.…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics and concerns in our society. It crosses many social, political, emotional and moral boundaries which is something many subjects cannot do all at once. This paper is meant to show my personal view on this controversial subject. Margaret Battin’s article ‘Euthanasia: The Fundamental Issues,’ discusses three moral principles that are typically used to argue for the legalization of euthanasia as a regulated practice. These three principles are; the Principle of Mercy, the Principle of (patient) Autonomy, and the Principle of Justice.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician assisted suicides are perceived as inhumane by the perception of some; however, these tactics are wanted by the governing body of the terminally ill and sufferers of intense pain. Patients receiving terminal care are typically uncomfortable and very fatigued. There isn’t, for the most part, a break in agony. Physician assisted suicide should be legalized because it gives terminally ill patients a chance to say their goodbyes and pass with dignity, protects both doctors and dying patients, and improves their quality of life. hi no…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The pro-euthanasia movement maintains that our rights include determining the time and manner of our own death. Given the fact that people die unexpectedly every day of both natural and accidental causes, this philosophy is patently absurd. If, however, one simply considers the so-called right to choose death when suffering is too great, then we have to ask the question of what kind of suffering qualifies. In contrast, people who disagree to allow euthanasia say that if the choice of euthanasia is considered as good as a decision to receive care, many people will feel guilty for not choosing death.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Following the recent passing of the “right to die” bill in California, euthanasia has become an increasingly debatable topic in the United States. Euthanasia, or also known as assisted suicide, or “ the Right to Die” is the act of medically ending someone or something’s life in a humane way. Only five states out of our nation, including California, have legalized assisted suicide. This controversial topic has been an issue for centuries all around the world. Citizens were swift to pick a “side”.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People have the right to make "important decisions about their lives for themselves according to their own values or conceptions of a good life, and in being left free to act on these decisions" (Brock 227). This allows people to take responsibility over their own lives as long as the person can make decisions. “For many patients near death, maintaining the quality of one’s life, avoiding great suffering, maintaining one’s dignity, and insuring that others remember us as we wish them to become of paramount importance and outweigh merely extending one’s life” (Brock 227. Life is about quality rather than quantity. Euthanasia is highly subjective; therefore, if it was legalized, then the law should not be very specific about the type of situation that euthanasia is permitted for a patient.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia, also known as doctor assisted suicide, and whether or not if it should be legalized is a very controversial. Euthanasia essentially is permission for doctors to end the lives of terminally ill people to end that pain. It being a very debatable topic some may argue that if there is no positive signs in sight then rather the patient suffer; end it. On the other hand is is arguable that life is valuable so live it through completely, and doctors being given the option of ending live devalues life. Personally, I believe under the right circumstances euthanasia is acceptable, especially if the victim of the suffering is asking to put an end to it as well.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When people are living in these conditions, we should strive to make their end as peaceful and easy as we can, rather than enhancing and prolong their misery any longer than it has to be. We have a duty to ensure that our loved ones are not suffering when it is their time to go. The legalisation of euthanasia would give us the opportunity to provide those in need to end their lives free from both physical and emotional…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is the act of a physician or other third party ending a patient 's life in response to severe, persistent and untreatable pain and suffering ( Morrow, 2016). Throughout the world we live in today this is a very touchy subject and has brought about a number of moral dilemmas, such as that people have a right to self-determination, and should definitely have the right to decide their own fate, or helping an individual with the knowing and accepting of their death is better than allowing them to continuously suffer. The main question surrounding this hot controversy is whether this process is ethical or not; should human beings have the right to decide on issues of life and death? When further looking into the different types…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States of America, the legality of physician-assisted suicide or “Active Euthanasia” has been the topic of a highly debated political controversy. Whether there is a morally relevant difference between “Active Euthanasia” and “Passive Euthanasia”, or more simply between doing and allowing harm is at the center of this dispute. Two American philosophers, James Rachels and Bonnie Steinbock share their outlooks on the topic in their essays Active and Passive Euthanasia (1975) and The Intentional Termination of Life (1979). Steinbock argues that Rachels has misinterpreted the standard view on the subject, or the view in which the American Medical Association has published, and refutes Rachel 's conclusion. However, Rachel 's provides…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People who are against euthanasia think that these laws against euthanasia are in place to prevent abuse and to protect people from unscrupulous doctors and others. They are not, and never have been, intended to make anyone suffer. In the other hand, supporters for active euthanasia believe that legislation against it is “violative of the fundamental concepts of liberty, freedom of choice, and self determination.” They base these beliefs on the content of the “Fourteenth Amendment” to the United States Constitution. The voluntary choice between life and death is to them, a basic human right which government has no right to decide (http://www.apa.org/pi/eol/arguments).…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephen G. Potts, author, writes his article “Looking for the Exit Door: Killing and Caring in Modern Medicine” to show his readers the nine consequences that he believes will arise if euthanasia is institutionalized, or legal, in the United States. Potts’ style of writing is different most other philosophical writers in the sense that he backs up his opinion on euthanasia by explaining his nine consequences and further elaborating them by examining scenarios that are applicable to the real world. From reading Potts’ article it is easy to understand from a legality standpoint Potts believes that his nine bad consequences are bad enough to outweigh any good that may come from euthanasia, so it should not be institutionalized. Before reading this article I was a firm believer that euthanasia should absolutely be institutionalized, however, after reading and dissecting all of Potts’ many good points I began to question whether or not euthanasia really is beneficial. After careful thought and consideration, I would have to disagree with Potts’ simply because his consequences are too easily argued and even potentially pointless.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The word euthanasia derives from greek origins that translates to ‘good death’. The Merriam Webster dictionary defines euthanasia as the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. The controversy surrounding euthanasia stems from whether an individual with a disability is able to make the choice to put an end to their life. It is difficult to establish whether the individual has a rational state of mind. Philosophical theories of morality and rationality can be applied to an individual’s right to death with dignity.…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If death is destined due to sickness, then the patient should be able to decide whether they want a peaceful death or a painful death. Patients who are suffering from an incurable disease, or any kind of disability do not deserve to suffer and legalizing euthanasia can help cure their suffering since not many want to live after a period of time when the patient and the doctor knows that it is too late and nothing further can be done to improve the patient’s condition, or relieve their pain. She could not end her life on her own terms, so instead she suffered: a crippling stroke; massive blood loss after an angiogram; dialysis; constant hospitalization; and mistreatment by staff. Month after month, she sank further into despair (Hayes). This excerpt is from an article where its author Mathew Hayes describes the condition and suffering that his grandmother had to go through before she reached the end of it.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays