Peasants would have to sell their grain to the wealthy or borrow from the wealthy (Lewis 2007, 22). This allowed the wealthy to control the peasants, because without them, the citizens would end in financial and legal trouble. The wealthy controlling the peasants decentralized the government’s power and led to the downfall of both dynasties. Heavy taxation also caused social unrest during the Qin dynasty, and this, coupled with the unrest caused by the forced labor, contributed to the downfall of the Qin dynasty (Langmead and Garnaut 2017). The construction of the Qin and Han Great Wall caused the citizens to suffer, and it even contributed to the downfall of both empires, but another problem existed, the formation of a nomadic empire, a large threat that had to be dealt …show more content…
An early, disastrous, defeat at the hands of the newly formed, powerful Xiongnu caused the policy of appeasement. The Han called this policy he qin, and they sent gold, silk, grain, and Chinese princesses to the Xiongnu in exchange for the agreement of peace (Lewis 2007, 132). The tributes sent to the Xiongnu each year were extremely expensive, but they did not satisfy the Xiongnu chieftains. Consequently, the Xiongnu kept raiding, and peace was only resumed on the premise of higher payments (Lewis 2007, 136). The policy of appeasement was very detrimental to the Han, but if the Qin had not constructed the first Great Wall, then the Xiongnu would not have existed. The Han would not have had to use massive amounts of resources to appease them. Eventually, the Han replaced this extremely expensive he qin policy with ideas of war to push the Xiongnu back and build another