When it comes to the Korean Comfort Women reading, Pyong Gap Min’s objective involves explaining the sufferings of the Korean victims (Min, 2003, p. 940). Her article opts for an “intersectional analysis” and includes three factors for the analysis: colonization, gender hierarchy, and social class (Min, 2003, p. 940). If the objective is to understand the suffering of the victims, this response argues that the aforementioned variables are the wrong variables to focus on. To put it simply, using the three factors, Min focuses too much on explaining the circumstance behind the establishment of military brothels and the victim’s social status and gender to account for their sufferings (initial and lasting). This response on the other hand, will
