Morality In Pygmalion

The term gentleman often describes a man who treats others with respect and kindness. However, should such a man commit undesirable acts for a righteous purpose, would he not also be considered a gentleman? Henry Higgins has hypocritical traits; he orders Eliza to act a certain way, when he does not do so himself. Nevertheless, when he recommends Eliza to marry, it is for the goal of her having economical support. He commands Eliza to be civil, meanwhile, he is asking for forgiveness for unknowingly appearing and talking indecently. Lastly, Higgins responds in an insulting manner to Eliza when she speaks improperly because he has a high regard for the English tongue, and desires it to be used with honor. Pygmalion by Bernard Shaw reveals that …show more content…
Bernard Shaw demonstrates in Pygmalion that a role model is elected by their intents and not their deeds. Mr. Higgins is a character with a false personality; he instructs others, but he himself does not complete those commands. He is an unmarried man, but because he hopes for Eliza to thrive he advises her to marry. While asking Eliza to appear ladylike, he apologizes for acting uncivil. Finally, Higgins humiliates Eliza for her inaccurate speech in order to direct others that the English language must be used with respect. These actions constitute a complicated character, one that does not necessarily fit it into any given stereotype. If one were to judge Higgins based purely on his actions, they might come to the conclusion that he is a vile individual. Yet Shaw is clearly suggesting that Higgins is a true gentleman. As a result it becomes apparent that a different method of judgement must be used, and the most obvious one is Higgins’ intent. The intent behind his actions makes Higgins a real gentleman, and the complex relationship between it and his actions shows that human nature can never be simply