The framers of the Constitution were aware of this constant change, so they made things a little vague while writing. They didn’t want to write in too specific of details, because they knew that there needed to be room for the Constitution to keep up with society. Had the framers not thought this far ahead into the future, had they only been worried about the way thing were right then, who knows what would have happened to our government by the turn of the century. I think that idea the authors are trying to get across at the start of the second half of the paper, is that we should not think of the Constitution as something that is set in stone. Yes, the rules are there and they are not changing. However, interpretations do change. The way we comprehend things changes based on things like context and personal understanding. The Constitution isn’t changing, but everything else constantly
The framers of the Constitution were aware of this constant change, so they made things a little vague while writing. They didn’t want to write in too specific of details, because they knew that there needed to be room for the Constitution to keep up with society. Had the framers not thought this far ahead into the future, had they only been worried about the way thing were right then, who knows what would have happened to our government by the turn of the century. I think that idea the authors are trying to get across at the start of the second half of the paper, is that we should not think of the Constitution as something that is set in stone. Yes, the rules are there and they are not changing. However, interpretations do change. The way we comprehend things changes based on things like context and personal understanding. The Constitution isn’t changing, but everything else constantly