The approach that is normally used is the one that the offenders can see how much harm they have caused and how it affected society. Rehabilitation alone is giving the offenders other forms of help and resources such as education and training. The main objective would be to consider the offender's future. Once the offender's penalty is imposed it is believed to reform the offender from future criminal activities. One of the disadvantages of rehabilitation would be is that the sentences are flawed. The reasoning for this is because it is thought to be that the offender is always at fault when in some cases it is not always correct. When it comes to the fairness of a sentence it can also be flawed because the go off of one background and does not go by what the damage the offender has …show more content…
One good thing about incapacitation is that it helps the offender by not being able to re-commit criminal activity. Incapacitation cost a lot of money but in the long run, it is a really good alternative when it comes to dealing with dangerous criminals. The dangerous offenders will be separated from the society through the selective incapacitation. The criminals that are in prison do come up with different techniques and also ideas that once released can have them commit more dangerous crimes or none at all. However, offenders that are young need time to mature and because of that, they are less likely to re-commit criminal activity. One of the methods of incapacitation would be the death penalty. When it comes to risk to the public and its members there is a big chance that there can be harm done from the offender later on down the road. Allen (2015) says that the consequence of incapacitation helps to keep criminal activity from happening. One of the things that will increase crime is when the offenders are discharged early which would because from budgetary and financial. Crimes are normally re-committed because when the offender is released they go back to the same