Purpose Of Jury Trial

Improved Essays
The purpose of a trial is to discover the truth. The process of a trial is adversarial in nature. The adversaries in a criminal trial are the state and the defendant. The state is represented by a prosecutor. A defendant is represented by a criminal lawyer. Only two percent of criminal cases are disposed of by jury trials (Bohm & Haley, 2012). Before a trial formally begins, attorneys can file pretrial motions. A motion is a request to the judge for a particular action. Motions to obtain prosecutorial evidence or suppress evidence are most common. In the case of a jury trial, the members of the jury are sworn in. The court clerk will read the criminal complaint. At this point, the prosecution begins the trial with an opening statement outlining the case. The next step is an opening statement from the defense. A defense attorney is not required to make an opening statement. The next step is for the prosecution to submit its evidence and question its witnesses (Bohm & Haley, 2012). The defense has a couple of options after the prosecution has submitted its evidence. If the defense feels that the prosecution has not proved its case, then the defense can simply rest. The term rest means to not defend against the charge or charges (Bohm & Haley, 2012). …show more content…
The article discusses the pros and cons of having experts as members of a jury. An example of an expert could be a doctor as a jury member in a medical case. The doctor could very well use his expertise to decide the case. The problem with this situation is the fact that neither the defense or prosecution had an opportunity to cross examine the doctor’s expertise. The doctor’s expertise is generally not a part of the evidence presented in a case. The article contend that the process of having expert jurors should be closely monitored (Liska, 2017). This is just one example of the complexities in a criminal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Essay

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, this means that there may also be a prodigious amount of room for mistake in convictions. Therefore, the jury system is not as effective as a bench trial due to it not being judged by a professional on the subject of law, the manner in which the court selects jurors is unfair, and the way that the jury is forced to decide can cause some poor judgment. Judges are given the powers they have because they are professionals on their subject matter; however, a jury is not quite the same. A jury trial is a trial that has twelve randomly selected citizens coming to a verdict instead of a judge.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sixth Amendment Rights

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The right to counsel is something that a defendant should be allowed as our Sixth Amendment right states. Having this right, give the defendant their own choice as to who can represent them, when they are paying for it on their own accord. The Sixth Amendment rights state, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. ”(Book).…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Court Cases

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On November 22, 2016, I sat in courtroom 507 of the Fresno County Superior Court, under the Honorable Judge Timothy Kams. Judge Kams was conducting a jury selection for a jury trial dealing with a felony DUI case. During the jury selection, I witnessed a Venire. A venire or jury pool, is a master list or jury list, from which a petit panel is selected, typically is based on names drawn from voter registration lists or lists of licensed drivers over eighteen years of age (Lippmann, 2014, p.518). I also witnessed a Voir Dire.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mock Jury Process

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Prior to the mock jury activity in class, I did not know or understand much about the judicial or trial process. In this paper, I will just summarize the trial, my thoughts on the jury process and if I think justice is achieved through these systems. I have been in a court situation before where I have needed to testify, so I understand a bit more about the trial system than someone who hasn’t experienced it. The mock trial was a very engaging and helpful activity where I was able to more fully understand what happens in a trial. I was able to put myself in the juror’s shoes and to feel how tough of a decision it is because someone’s life is in your hands.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Jury Trial Summary

    • 2340 Words
    • 10 Pages

    These cases traditionally would come in droves and would be completed quickly as well. Most were decided via a Summary Jury Trial, which essentially serves as a precursor to a real trial. The Summary Jury Trial is meant to encourage settlement. The testimony is delivered before a…

    • 2340 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal defense attorneys are skilled professionals who have experience defending their clients against serious felony or misdemeanor criminal charges. The best criminal defense professionals have completed years of education in the law and criminal defense fields and they have hundreds of hours of real-world courtroom experience facing aggressive prosecutors. When faced with a criminal complaint, the defendant must know how to find the best defense team available in order to increase their odds of an acquittal, favorable plea bargain or 'not guilty' verdict. According to Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Tommy Adler, his goal within the courtroom is always to present his client as more than just the charges facing him and to convince the…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Over the years, the role and the responsibility of the jury have been through numerous transformations, hence these improvements made the presence of jury trials a highly controversial topic, leading to the question ‘Are juries needed in the English legal system?’. This essay aims to argue this question from different perspectives. It will first describe the evolution of the jury system and their current role in UK justice. Then, it will go through to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of having such a system using relevant cases. Lastly, it will mention the alternatives for the jury system and conclude by providing an answer to the question mentioned above.…

    • 2069 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Developed trustworthiness between jurors is an ice-breaker encourage to discuss the case fairly and without prejudging the…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jurors, probably the most important aspect of the criminal justice system, in itself. The American justice system, is built on the idea that justice is blind, therefore, justice is fair, however, it is the jury that ensures that fairness, with that said, it is understandable how one’s bias can compromise the criminal justice system. Therefore, jurors are faced with their own personal bias, moreover, they struggle with their decisions due to personal beliefs, some of which may not be ethical. It is clear, that the adversarial, or adversary system, allows for the most transparent and fair process that exist on this planet, just ask the People’s Republic of…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Liberals see crime not as a product of individual moral failure but as the result of social influences (Currie, 1985). The root causes for crime is unemployment, racial discrimination, and government policies that work to the disadvantage of the poor. Liberals believe that the way to reduce crime is to change the social environment. The due process model reflects that police powers should be limited to prevent official oppression of the individual.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are multiple stages of the criminal court process that create a burden of proof that contribute to criminal justice investigations. Every court process begins with a crime allegedly committed to determining its legal status. Law enforcement and detectives determine if the crime was illegal or legal due to the investigations. They investigate a crime by interviewing victims, witnesses, and suspects. They also gather physical evidence by taking pictures, fingerprint, and DNA samples.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    | |Many judges believe jurors usually return the right verdict, very few|Easily influenced by impressive barristers, or the judge.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays