Navneet Kaur English 120 Wendy Hayden November 1, 2017 Erwin Chemerinsky’s article “Hate speech is protected from free, even on college campuses” is a response to professor Robert’s C. Post on why all sorts of opinions should be expressed on college campuses, regardless of their offense and unpopularity. As students are disrespected by the thoughts of most conservative speakers, colleges have to shell out thousands of dollars for student safety and to allow speakers to deliver their ideas without any trouble. Chemerinsky, who taught law at UC Irvine, experienced this attitude when his students believed that school officials had the right to limit hate speech. As opposed to Post, Chemerinsky believes that hate speech should be addressed if…
Just because the students like what they had to say doesn’t mean they should be convicted for stating their opinions. Though a bit more extreme the Texas vs. Johnson case dealt with a similar issue of distinguishing between threatening and disliked opinions. Johnson was arrested mostly because his actions offended someone. Similarly, these professors and administers are being forced from their jobs for saying…
In my opinion, the cases in our reading require teachers to behave in a professional manner and to exercise good judgment in choosing methods of teaching. The readings also indicate that when the public does not agree with material or political views, that in itself is not justification to suppress information in the school. In Pickering v. BOE, a case demonstrating freedom of expression, the teacher had the right to express their concern over how the BOE was handling public funds. Pickering’s letter did not implicate someone he would need to work with on a daily basis so it didn’t disrupt the harmony of the school or work with his colleagues and he conducted himself in a professional manner. Furthermore, his letter was an opposing opinion to the BOE, not an attack.…
In The Atlantic Magazine, an article entitled, “The Coddling of the American Mind” by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt addressed and issue occurring on college campuses. That issue is trigger warnings and its impact on the academe. This study asks a question: Are trigger warnings impacting the academic freedom of faculty? The University of Chicago is one of many institutions willing to take on the issue, establishing a position in support of its facility and academic freedom.…
In Victor Tan Chen article, on “Are Campus Activist Too Dogmatic”, many points were made, however was not followed by a valid argument. In his article, he discussed how college activist is a nuisance to society in a way that targets liberals. Chen never seems to emphasize in his article the reasons for the campus activists protest, yet includes the fact that their protest is highly severe. In other words, Chen’s article is almost dismissive to the whole point of the student protesters furthermore, describing their actions as being useless in its entirety even with them tackling issues like racism and sexism. It is a total disregard of your first amendment right, abridging the right to freedom of speech in this country in a logical…
The wrongful prosecution of “a white student guilty of racial harassment for reading a book titled Notre Dame vs. the Klan” (LG 5) should raise an alarm that we punish those who education themselves to recognize and prevent the reoccurrence of heinous historical acts. Society has initiated a movement that “sought to restrict speech (specifically hate speech aimed at marginalized groups), but it also challenged the literary, philosophical, and historical canon, seeking to widen it by including more-diverse perspectives” (LG 2). Limiting speech of any form is a violation of freedom of speech. Speech should be moderated to respect individual values, not to avoid uncomfortable topics. The purpose in higher education is to enlighten students and provide knowledge that creates understanding and tolerance of…
In the United states society lacks the rights to life, liberty , and pursuit of happiness ; however due to harmful laws that have been gently crafted by. Modern day laws take away our rights by allowing abortions, sentencing prisoners to death, and prohibiting ones purist of happiness over all we no longer posse our rights Abortions are bad because we are taking away a defenseless child's life without his , or her consent even thought they are not considered an American citizen. Every day 125,000 babies are murdered by doctors the very ones that are here to heal us. Tara Culp-Ressler states that 47,000 women die due to unsafe abortions.…
In the Santa Rosa Junior College, the Daily Illini newspaper, and in the Harvard English Department case the same thing happened, they were criticized and called out for there comments. Even though, they tried getting away by saying that the First Amendment defends…
(Hazelwood Sch. Dist. vs. Kuhlmeier, 1988). A school's action to suppress free speech can also depend on the age and maturity of students; the relationship between teaching method and valid educational objective; and the context and manner in which the material is presented. (Ward vs. Hickey, 1993).…
Many colleges have been known to outright use Free Speech Zones to shut down certain viewpoints that students or registered school organizations may hold; others use them as a way to monitor outside groups and speakers that come to universities and mention unpopular topics, meanwhile students who attend the college are still allowed to organize as they please outside of free speech zones; and then there are those colleges that have been quite lenient on the issue of free speech regardless of the speech coming from either a student or an outside source. With the wide range of opinion on the issue of free speech, it is clear some schools will be hit harder than…
When I first arrived at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, I expected higher education to be a bastion for peoples to freely express themselves, providing the ability for both students and faculty to openly interact and engage with their peers regarding a multitude of subjects. Yet this feeling dramatically changed with time. During my sophomore year, I saw the campus’ College Republicans falsely label the school as anti-free expression due to a funding dispute between the group and student government. Instead of debating the value of bringing in various perspectives to campus, the conversation focused around showcasing a conservative perspective in an arena the College Republicans found as threatening.…
Should free speech be Restricted for Teachers and Students? Teachers and students have a right to freedom of speech. All people have a say in things on what they believe is wrong. Freedom of speech gives people that right to express any opinions without restraint whether it’s about school uniforms, trigger warnings, and posting stuff online about your school. Free speech should not be restricted for teachers and students because one the First Amendment which gives people the right to speak their minds and two people should be honest with themselves.…
College is supposed to teach students freely and discuss material that open ups the mind without limitation. According to college professor Lisa Hjjar, “Any kind of trigger policy is inimical to academic freedom” (Medina). An example of this would be if an English professor wants to read the book “The Adventures Huckleberry Finn”. This book has many trigger warning on it because of the numerous racial slurs. But, the book also has a moral teaching behind it that is expressed throughout the book as well.…
Two sides of an ignorant coin America could have been the city on a hill. America could have lead the world to a brighter future. America could have represented the people that make up the country well. America could have been as perfect as John Winthrop imagined it could be. But a black and white political system and distrust of the educated is preventing that.…
To me both freedom of speech and academic freedom serve the same purpose and necessity, especially on a college campus. If institutions of higher learning are allowed to infringe on the expressed rights of students, faculty, and staff as a nation it is my belief that we have lost all hope in our government, and in the laws that are implemented to serve and protect us. The Bill of Rights was implemented to protect society, institutions of higher learning were also implemented to protect society, if one disregards the other it will be a systemic failure that we will all…