What Is The Death Penalty Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
COUNTERPOINT [Murphy] The death penalty does not always help the families achieve closure, infact, many family members of the murder victims are against the death penalty. There are many groups that are coming together to advocate for the end of the death penalty, such as Murder Victims’ Families for Reconciliation (MVFR) and the California Crime Victims for Alternatives to the Death Penalty (CCV). On the “about the CCV” page on their website, it says that “after the horrifying loss of a loved one to homicide, they are left with a clear awareness that the death penalty fails to address the needs of victims on many counts” (“Home”). They talk about how the money that they spend on actually executing someone could go to the families of the victims …show more content…
While this has some truth to it, it is not enough to murder these people. “Since 1973, for example, 150 US prisoners sent to death row have later been exonerated” (“Amnesty International”). This means that in the past 40 some years 150 people have been killed for “committing” a crime that they did not actually commit. How is this preventing crime? The government has now taken the lives of 150 innocent people. This is just as bad, if not worse than the criminal who actually commits a crime that is “death penalty worthy”. “Some of the states that most avidly execute prisoners, such as Texas and Oklahoma, have higher crime rates than states that offer only life in prison without parole” (“Saving Lives and Money”). That does not really seem like it is deterring crime. If the death penalty is all about making crime lower, why would the crime rate in the places with the most capital punishment executions have some of the highest crime rates? According to death penalty.org, since 1976, Texas has had 531 executions and Oklahoma has had 112 executions. This totals 643 people that were murdered by two states alone (“Death Penalty Info”). “According to a survey of the former and present presidents of the country’s top academic criminological societies, 88% of these experts rejected the notion that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder… Consistent with previous years, the 2014 FBI …show more content…
The quote is describing how the death penalty is an undesirable side effect of the current culture of violence that is plaguing the world. It then goes on to say that the death penalty will not fix the issue. This means that the death penalty will in no way prevent crimes from happening, it will not decrease the overcrowding in the jails, and it certainly will not fix the issues that loved ones of the victim have with closure. The death penalty is practically legalized

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty should be legal in the United States because it is morally acceptable, would reduce the country's crime rate, and is constitutional.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal punishment is an immensely ongoing controversial and societal issue in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. There are thirty-one states that have kept the death penalty as a legal punishment and nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty, including New Jersey in 2007. Statistics show that 39 percent choose life without parole plus restitution, 33 percent would choose Capital Punishment, 13 percent chose life without parole, 9 percent picked life with parole, and 6 percent had no opinion. One of the main reasons people are pro death penalty is because it gives closure to the victim’s family. Defenders think that “taking an offender 's life is a more severe punishment than any prison life term.” (Funk & Wagnalls). “Life…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This statement also leads the reader towards the point that those who have taken a life may have the potential to do it again, if we get rid of them it prevents others from endangering others later on. Sadly the article did not provide strong statistics to prove it’s point. To see if these statements are accurate I compared American states that had capital punishment to the states that did not. It turned out that in the past twenty years, the homicide rates in the states with capital punishment has been 48% to 101% higher than the states without capital punishment (Death Penalty Information Center). Also ten out of the twelve states without capital punishment had a homicide rate below the national average. From these numbers it is hard to see capital punishment as a crime deterrent. To further see the falsehood in capital punishment as a deterrence I searched Canada’s homicide rate. The homicide rate in Canada in 1975 (capital punishment abolished in 1976) was at 3.03 (victims per 100,000 people).…

    • 1370 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    More families like Mark Klaas' will be able to get closure if the death penalty proceeds for all murders. Dismissing the death penalty would lead to families living in constant fear and never being able to move forward with their lives. The Los Angeles Airport Peace Officers Association said it like this, "Giving up on the death penalty would mean giving up on justice for crime victims and their families." By widening the criteria for capital punishment, more families will be able to feel closure. Families will let go of what has happened, and move forward without ever hearing the name of that murderer…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the severity of the death penalty will make criminals want to avoid it. However, the statistics tell a different story. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the rates of murder, one of the most common violent crimes in the U.S., are higher in states using capital punishment than the ones that aren’t (Deterrence). While the general trend of murder rates has been a downwards one, there’s still a significant percentage difference in the statistics (peak difference was 46% in 2005). This evidence shows that the idea that capital punishment is a deterrent is false. Therefore, a logical next step would be to completely stop the use of this penalty in the country, since the states that don’t use it have, to a certain extent, deterred criminals from committing a violent…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Author William Tucker uses his 2000 American Spectator article to explain why the death penalty is actually a deterrent to criminals. Tucker analyzes the statistics of crime over the years and concludes that when death penalty rates are up, murder rates are down, and when execution rates decrease, the rate of homicides rises (par. 13). While many criminologists believe that the death penalty doesn’t affect the amount of murders that take place in America, Tucker counters by saying, “The results are plain to see. Beginning at almost the exact point when executions ended, murder soared to unprecedented heights. The murder rate tied the 1933 record in 1973, broke it in 1974, broke it again in 1980, and peaked a third time…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adrianne Haslet Davis, author of the article “Why the Death Penalty Must Live,” (Davis “Why the Death Penalty Should Live”) is a survivor of the Boston Bombing. Because of this act of terrorism she lost her legs and her life was changed forever. She writes that because she experienced that tragedy she has become a huge advocate of the death penalty. She writes, “ Many in the survivor community feel like the death penalty offers a sense of justice being done.” It was because she was a victim and lost loved ones to that horrible act of terrorism that she is now not only for the death penalty but is a publicly speaking and trying to convince others that the death penalty does befit justice. Adrianne gives hope by writing, “I hope that the death penalty in this case sets as a precedent, and I hope that it’s a deterrent.” (Davis “Why the Death Penalty Should Live”) by stating this Adrianne is conveying that the death penalty will hopefully instill fear for future criminals to steer them away from the horrible crime of taking a life of an innocent…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A murderer should not be able to roam the streets and perhaps commit another crime. The victims of horrible crimes should have a breathe of relief that the criminal is out of this world. Many who are not victims believe this, because they feel vengeful. They see stories on the news, or the papers, and they wonder why would someone do something so harmful as murdering an innocent. Many victims, such as Mark Klaas, believe the death penalty is a way of helping the victims move on. Klaas’ daughter, Polly Klaas, was kidnapped and murdered by Richard Allen Davis. Klaas states, “it (the death penalty) does make a difference. It’s about carrying out the law. It’s about the final judgement. Those individuals I’ve talked to - family members have witnessed executions - are grateful for the experience, sad that it had to come to that, but satisfied that justice has been served” (Does). Klaas believes the death penalty helps many…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the article, the death penalty “death penalty deters criminals from committing serious offenses.” ("The Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty"). Seeing as how most human beings fear death, the death penalty is good for keeping people from doing heinous crimes. The Constitution allows the death penalty in “appropriate cases.” So not all crimes are worthy of death, but the debate over this topic still rages on with strong opinions on both sides. Also note that in some prisons you can get a free education!…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an article it says that “All fifty states average fourteen executions annually”(David). Nevertheless “Death penalty costs can be expensive, but in the end saves lives”(David). Basically what the evidence is trying to explain that people are already being sentenced to capital punishment, but it is expensive in some cases, keeping you safe from dangerous criminals which is capital punishment. Consequently “The more severe the penalty the more it deters”(Jacoby). “When the death penalty is consistently enforced, a significant number of homicides will be prevented”(Jacoby). What the article means by this is that capital punishment “scares” people away from doing murderous activities because instead of being put in jail they are put to…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Systematic Denial

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Individuals argue “death is different” and due to the fact that people have very strong beliefs about the morality and utility of execution, the death penalty can bring about incredible confliction between surviving family members. Disagreement over the death penalty can tear families apart rather than bring them together to endure the hardships they face. The death penalty creates a victim out of the criminal. Those who are executed have siblings, parents, and loved ones. “Our broken death penalty system, with its years of delays and other problems, holds a victim’s focus, and society's focus, on the killer, anticipating and expecting an event,the event, the killer’s execution. If and when an execution occurs, another coffin is filled and another family grieves a killing, but, sadly very little changes for the victim” (Evans). Not only does is affect the criminal's family, but capital punishment also affects the victim's family. The death penalty puts the media spotlight on murderers and makes fame out of a killer. Execution turns offenders into victims and they gain celebrity in their death. For example, everyone knows the name “Jeffrey Dahmer” but next to nobody knows the name of his 17 victims.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, the death penalty gives the victim’s family a piece of mind. Only because it is an exchange of the crime that prisoner committed. The family will have the assurance that they can gain revenge through the pain and suffering that they experienced, which is the loss of one of their family members. Families may believe that if you give the prisoner the death penalty that is one convict down and many more to go, they will be a bit safer with that prisoner dead and gone and would not have to worry about that prisoner going to kill off many other people and having many more…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The use of the death penalty has been a long discussed debate in the criminal justice system. First going into this discussion one must discuss the definition of the death penalty and its history. The death penalty for crimes has been a tool used throughout history. The first ever recorded execution of a criminal in America occurred in the year 1612 when a Spanish spy was caught. Each colony had its own laws for the states justification of taking a life. Fast forward to the 1930s on the edge of the great depression and resurgence in the publishing works of criminologists who suggested that the death penalty had a key role in society there was a surge in death penalty cases. During this decade there was an average of 167 people put to death…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Death Penalty Prevents Future Murder,” “Even though statistical demonstrations are not conclusive, and perhaps cannot be, capital punishment is likely to deter more than other punishments because people fear death more than anything else” (1). What this guy is saying is that the penalty stops people from committing horrendous crimes because people fear death more than they fear being put in prison for life. Having a harsher punishment deters people from doing something that will punish them horribly they will think twice. David Muhlhausen states in his article "Capital Punishment Works: It Deters Crime," "Studies of the death penalty have reached various conclusions about its effectiveness in deterring crime. But... the majority of studies that track effects over many years and across states or counties find a deterrent effect" (David 1). David is saying that having the death penalty does, in fact, have an effect on people. People who watch other people commit the crimes are more likely to think about what choices they make. Criminal minds work differently than your average…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Emory University researchers, including Paul Rubin, said, “The national sorting of crime rates each execution prevented 18 deaths.” That is 18 lives saved due to capital punishment. However, there are several why reasons the death penalty could be abolished. Comparatively, the death penalty is considered an unjust act towards humanity. That “an eye for an eye” isn’t necessarily the right way to handle such heinous crimes. Whereas most of the United States feel as though life without parole would be the best option for these criminals. An article from the ACLU website states, “No one sentenced to life without parole has ever been released on parole. Prisoners sentenced to LWOP actually stay in prison until they die.” Statics show that one of the biggest reasons the death penalty should be abolished is because of the amount of money spent to execute a person. An article written in the Denver post states that “Between 1977-2002, 250 million dollars was spent to carry out the sentences of 11 prisoners executed in California.” Additionally, this is such a substantial amount of money that could have been spent on government jail programs or put towards other safety…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics