Public Order Identification

Decent Essays
I identify with both Individual Rights and Public Order. My identification with Individual Rights is my belief that everyone should be guaranteed the First Ten Amendments of the Constitution. For example, without the Right to Bear Arms citizens would not be able to protect families and properties. Furthermore, violent crimes would increase. Law abiding citizens would be targeted by criminals knowing that the likely hood of protection by firearms would not be option for citizens. In the book on page 6,, “it says, Although some research doubted the accuracy of official accounts, reports by the FBI of traditional crimes like murder, rape, and assault increased considerably during the 1970’s and 1980’s”. With that being said, if the Right to

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms is seen as individual, with the potential for it to be withheld from specific individuals for the good of the public, but that only a tyrannical government would seek to withhold the right to bear arms from all…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On December 15, 1791, The Bill of Rights was established to prevent the government from being intrusive on its citizens. Written by James Madison, the first 10 amendments of the Constitution make up the Bill of Rights. This established each and every individual’s birth-given right. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bare arms, as stated, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bare arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment was a controversial topic in the late 60s to mid-70s when Nixon was in office, and again in 1981-1989 when Reagan was in office.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Interpreting the Second Amendment In the Bill of Rights, the citizens are given the privilege to own firearms for their personal protection. However, the Second Amendment seemed to take away this right by adding the concept of “organized militia.” In Columbia v. Heller, the court held that individuals could possess firearms without having to be the members of a militia. However, judge Stevens gave a dissent stating that all judgments should be made with the direction of past cases and court decisions. His main argument came from the fact that gun control laws had not been made unconstitutional.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fundamental rights are granted through the Constitution of the United States, and are a part of our liberty and freedom. Also, The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words the right to bear arms should not be taken away from anyone. Opponents of gun control consider the right to bear arms in some sense a fundamental right, and having those rights taken away is unconstitutional. Although the Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, it doesn’t protect against felons possessing a firearm.…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Modern Characterization of Paine’s America Thomas Paine's’ Rights of Man in 1791 gives his views on the characterization of America. Here, I found many points in contrast with that of the characterization of modern-day America with that of Thomas Paine's’. With this I say that the envisionment of Thomas Paine's characterization has many points of which don’t hold true today. The characterization of America today is a tricky subject to put your foot down on and is best to say we never will. Paine’s envisionment still holds some truth with America today.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States is a nation where individual rights are guaranteed and practiced to some extent. For example, the amendments created by the United States government have raised questions and doubts in many individual’s minds where an answer is nowhere to be found. As stated in 2nd amendment “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” This has become a controversial issue all around the United States of America. Although some people may believe that guns should be banned, in reality the right to be armed should not be ceased because it provides protection and it reveals to the American Citizens that their rights are guaranteed.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second Amendment Debate

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Now lets set up a situation that has occurred time after time. A homeowner is asleep and wakes up to the sound of breaking glass and heavy footsteps. The homeowner immediately leaps out of bed and grabs their firearm, which lies nearby. Once the homeowner realizes their house is being intruded they spot the suspect and fire their weapon, killing the burglar and saving their family, as well as their property. This situation worked out in the homeowners favor because of the Second Amendment to the constitution.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The day begins just like any other in a quiet, small town, when out of nowhere a suspicious man enters the local bank and confidently states that this is a holdup. All of the innocent bystanders inside the bank are physically incapacitated initially out of fear as the bank robber brandishes his intimidating firearm while giving directions to the civilians not to move or speak unless exclusively instructed to do so at his command. The man also warns them not to try anything sneaky or else he will be compelled to do something crazy. The suspect makes his way to the bank tellers at which point he aggressively grabs one of the employees by the shirt and demands they empty the vaults and hand over the funds to him. Meanwhile, one of the hostages…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lately, with the high rise of gun violence and mass shootings in the United States gun control, gun laws, and the Second Amendment have been a prevalent controversial topic amongst many. The Second amendment word for word states: A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The Second Amendment has been interpreted in many different ways, but it serves one specific purpose. If you read the federalist papers, you will understand the thought process of our founding fathers as they wrote the constitution bill of rights.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individual rights vs. Public Order is a hot topic that has been debated for decades among the people and political parties in America. The side I support the most is public order because I think it is necessary that more action be taken, observing how the crime rates have risen since the era of the civil rights movement (1960s-1970s). During the 1960s, I believe it was imperative for more individual rights to be provided to fellow citizens of the United States, as many minorities were treated unfairly. But a new time has arisen, and after the Sandy Hook case, I consider it as the ultimate indication in that more gestures have to be taken for public safety.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will be analyzing and criticizing the argument given by Jeff McMahan in his paper “Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough”. This essay goes against my personal bias and strives to support an argument in favor of private gun ownership to a certain extent. McMahan is hasty in deciding that a complete ban is necessary to restore order and peace; I refute his conclusion by showing that a gun ban would not be able to stop the ongoing need for safety and because of this an increase in gun control policy would be the best solution to the gun problem in the United States. One portion of the paper provides a summary of the argument given by McMahan in his paper in depth, evaluating his premises and conclusion to establish the position the…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Right to Bear Arms The argument that “outlawing guns will leave only criminals with guns”, has been debated over and over throughout the years without a truly clear answer being reached. As tragedies such as school shootings in Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and more recently Florida become more and more common place, gun control laws have become the focal point of national concern, and call for more gun control laws has gotten louder and louder. The Constitution grants American’s the right to bear arms, but over the years these rights have become infringed upon as new laws are passed in response to specific acts and the call for new safety measures. Guns rights are a constitutional privilege that should not be regulated for unnecessary reasons…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lately, it seems that every time you turn on the television, there is an incidence of gun violence in the news. School shootings, domestic violences, and other forms of firearm brutality make up most of the content displayed in the media, calling for a possible increase in gun control in the United States. This controversial subject has become a common topic of debate all over the country: should civilian-use of violent firearms be limited or prohibited, or should the decision to possess these guns be up to the individual person? There are many arguments supporting and opposing the government 's right to restrict the rights that the Constitution imposes. Some argue that taking weapons away from the people is a violation of the Second Amendment, while others argue that guns have changed too much over time for the allowances of the…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Right to Own Guns A man is exercising his right to carry a firearm, some people feel safe knowing that if an intruder were to pose a threat, he would be stopped. Others feel that their own lives are in danger because of that man carrying a gun. This places a perspective on the ongoing debate over gun control. Some people believe that guns should be monitored, restricted, limited, or completely banned.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays