Essay on Public Compliance : A Neutralizing Attempt

1732 Words Nov 28th, 2015 null Page
Public Compliance: A Neutralizing Attempt
To establish relevance between the scope of modern prejudice and its connection to public compliance, one needs to understand the impact of conformity. As both a direct and indirect implication of social identity, conformity facilitates the sense of belonging elaborated earlier. Respectively, the basic definition of conformity specifies changes in an individual’s behaviour resulting from the real or imagined influence of others (Aronson et al., 2013, p. 194). Consistent with belonging and the process by which an individual establishes such connection – social norms appoint the regulations about how one obtains and maintains that connection, thus, preserving belonging (Aronson et al., 2013, p. 202). Consequently, if falling short, one is subject to repercussions involving: ridicule, punishment, and rejection (Aronson et al., 2013, p. 202).
As can be expected, the abovementioned can become a liability between the individual and group members, and subsequently, between groups. Bearing all, public compliance describes the act of publicly conforming to a group without privately believing in the conformity’s constituents (Aronson et al., 2013, p. 197). Public compliance, then, advances the salience of normative social influence which stipulates publicly complying with social norms without privately accepting them (Aronson et al., 2013, p. 202). Why then, comply and conform? Aronson and colleagues (2013) adopt an evolutionary stance…

Related Documents