In each case for people that …show more content…
What in their life environmental or family upbringing caused them to commit a crime. I feel this goes back to when they are having delusions or hallucinations they mentally can not handle what is going on around them, and act out. Normal people do commit crimes, but why do they commit the crimes, again. Is it that they get an adrenaline rush that they are doing something they are specifically told not to do or is it that they were never given a lot of boundaries as a child, and now is looking to get a structure put in …show more content…
Alzheimers, Schizophrenia, etc., but I do believe that someone who is mentally ill should not just go straight to jail for committing something they at the moment did not know they were committing. However, I do believe after they have sought treatment, and is able to understand what they did that they should be have to own up to it. Like I said in my post that each crime needs to be treated on a per crime bases, and not just a straight across “if you did this, then you must face said punishment”.
228 words
Post by Rebecca Garabis
15 hours ago
Re: Ham D11
Katie I do agree with you that criminal behavior is a factor of both biological and social factors. We feel the need that to find something wrong with an individual that committed a crime because having a “normal” person just come out and commit a crime makes that “normal” factor seem to real. The normal is no longer normal. We associate someone to be like us, and when they jeopardized we look for a reason to say they were not actually normal to keep us separate from that in which committed a crime.
I agree with you that with each crime comes a different way to handle it, but again very in favor of both forms to handle the crime. For those that do not want to seek treatment or feel there is nothing wrong with them, need to have a punishment to make them realize that in this instance what you did is wrong, and you must own up to the