Psalm 13: The Existence Of God

Improved Essays
The Existence of God
The existence of God has been debated through the history of man. Many philosophers argue that they may or may not be a God or the idea that many different Gods exist. But if you think logical you will realize the debate on God existence can be seen as a myth for many reason. The lack of knowledge or the limited knowledge of God existing leaves behind a gap in history. Therefore, the possibly idea of finding a missing part of history is impossible. The reality of it all is that in every hostile situation a God will exist. God existence is valid because you cannot question the faith of his name.
People will not believe in God existence because they cannot see or touch him. When you have faith you will believe without being able to touch or see it. Faith is so powerful because it is within self. To believe the concept our minds well never allow us to comprehend immortality but our souls can, and that is faith. To believe in God you have to believe in his existence. The bible will only guide you but you faith will make you believe. If God did not exist, he would not be the greatest being imaginable. In conclusion, God does exist. From this argument, God’s
…show more content…
The existence of God was once never denied, as His presence, His existence was evident in miracles and the people's faith. Psalm 13:1 reads, "The Fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.' This argument itself suggest God existence is true. If you take in account the Laws of Logic God established you then will realize his existence. God created a universe so magical that sometimes you cannot believe how you got here. The Laws of Logic cannot be denied. In fact, any reasonable or logical argument against the existence of these laws requires their existence in the first place. The Laws of Logic were created not to be questioned because they precede God’s existence or to recognize him even if he is invisible or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    We as Christians could be wrong, but someone has yet to prove us 100 percent wrong. The cumulative case approach is the idea that not one argument is the ultimate argument for proof of God’s existence. Instead, a collection of all the arguments provides us with the strongest case. The last thing to remember is that the arguments are being used to advocate for a minimalistic version of God. There are so many facets and details about God…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It appears to be difficult to contend this however one could without much of a stretch envision that some matter just exists as well; and that it doesn 't make a difference to the circumstances and end results administer yet exists in light of the fact that. There is no motivation to infer that God is the main thing conceivable of this exclusion making the contention miss the mark at demonstrating God 's presence. Perhaps some exceptionally straightforward piece or bits of matter just existed bringing about the chain of occasions prompting the entire universe being made. On the off chance that God can have no cause, than it 's pretty much as legitimate a suspicion to think different things could have no cause…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When the proponents of the theory of conflicting truths argue against the existence of God, they seem to interpret it as a knowledge and not a belief proposal, and when they fail to find the knowledge to support the existence of God, then they discredit the same existence. Therefore, their support for the theory is not based on the lacking existence of God, but lack of knowledge to support the existence of God (Hick J. H., 1983). The religious belief that God exists is a common interest for all the religions, but none has a concrete way to explain…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Do God And Evil Coincide?

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    He says that we try to come up with solutions so that God can logically exist, but they all fail at creating any logical arguments. One of our solutions is that good cannot exist without evil, but he says this is a fallacy because if God had limitless power then he could create good without evil, which means God does not exist. Next is that evil is as a means to good which is a huge restriction to God’s power because it is basically saying that God has to follow some sort of rule. Lastly there is the idea that evil exists because humans have free will; God could have and should have created us to only know and act good, which would then mean that evil would never have existed if he was actually all-powerful. He says that this disproves God because we would not have been created like this if he really were all-powerful, but I believe there was a…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this is true and God is truly an all-knowing God, then we would not have free choice. It would contradict his power. An all-knowing God cannot ever be wrong. If he knew what was going to happen and every detail to anything then we were only following God’s wish not our free choice. Aquinas argued this, though.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Without faith, we would not believe in ourselves, let a long anything else. Some have asked me what came first God or faith? God created me and I have faith in God, so both. Fideism is a a reliance of faith rather than reason in matters of religion and philosophy. As I stated previously, history has shown us how to be critical thinkers and rationalists, and go from there.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For God to have failed to exist something had the power to prevent his existence, but God by definition is all powerful. Therefore, for God to exist his existence is necessary. In scenario two, God could have existed but doesn’t. In this situation something would have caused God to exist or he came into existence at a moment in time without a cause. Both explantion go against the eternal nature of God, which is necessary to be the greatest conceivable being.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This problem proves that there is a separate standard of right and wrong that has nothing to do with God or His commands. Most believers want to acknowledge an idea that right and wrong was created by their religion and God because they think they are not religious if they don’t associate right and wrong with God. Since this theory fails to connect morality with God, then believers of Him would dismiss it. This dismissal of the theory should not alter their faith in God, though. Many scholars and believers, like St. Thomas Aquinas, refused the Divine Command Theory for this reason but still believe in God and His instructions.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    These three philosophers Anselm, Guanilo and Thomas Aquinas present their arguments about the existence of God that not everyone would agree with their view of how God exists. One philosopher Thomas Aquinas gives the better evidence in opinion because he argues that everything that has breath must have a creator. Aquinas opinion is the only thing that makes sense of what these three philosophers say about the existence of God. God does exist not for what these three philosophers say, but God exists with the faith of what the Bible says. Anselm's argues that he is supposed to seek God with his whole heart, but how can he worship someone he has not seen.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will dispute that Anselm’s ontological argument is dependent on Anselm’s personal faith in God. My argument lies within the premises that Anselm offers, it would not be rationally acceptable to create content of a maximally perfect being unless the person already accepted the Christian faith. The premises for Anselm’s argument can only be held if the only conception of non greater (relative to his attributes and worldly design) is God but if one does not follow such religious paths how can it be god. So in a sense god wouldn’t exists since you can’t have a mere conception of god without prior experience or impression of him. I will engage this scope of criticism by touching on Humean concepts and conveying how Anselm faith structured…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays