Proslavery Evolution Essay

1228 Words 5 Pages
Proslavery Evolution Slavery was heavily relied on prior to the birth of the United States. The pro-slavery movement skyrocketed after the American Revolution considering many citizens were slavery supporters, simply because slaves were used to support the nation’s agriculture predominantly in the south. Slavery was widespread throughout Virginia and in the southern states. Americans capitalism fundamentally depended on slavery which caused a growth in the slave population. After international slave trade became illegal, the demand for slaves increased rapidly. More and more slaves were demanded in the South due to the new Cotton Kingdom. When Southern landowners realized how valuable slaves were to their success, the pro slavery movement …show more content…
During this period the pro slavery supporters became more aggressive with there efforts to keep slavery alive. Allegations like “any disastrous occurrences disturb the South, not only the whites and negroes of the slave-holding states would sink into poverty and suffering.” 3 Furthermore, “Every country must have its labourers, men who are willing to be directed by the mind and capital of others.” 4 The South argued that someone had to do the hard labor to start building the country. While using the term “willing” as if slaves had the opportunity to make a decision to work or not. They mention men who would do the labour instead of themselves, to reassure that is what slaves are for. Ultimately, pro slavery supporters began to preach that slaves were happy they were not free men because they were sheltered from oppression. The mindset shifted from expressing the benefits of slavery to saying enslaved men and woman were happier than those who were free and struggling in the north. “No fear of want disturbs his slumbers. Hunger and cold are strangers to him; and in sickness or age he knows that he has a protector and a friend able and willing to shield him from suffering.” These statements were to convince the north, but the Americans weren’t fools to believe just anything. Especially since there was proof from books like ______ and ______ describing …show more content…
Although, there were many influential politicians that supported the pro slavery movement. John C. Calhoun was recognized to be a political leader for the south and and devoted much of his cognition to defending slavery. When the debate on Missouri arose, John Quincy Adams stated “I had some conversation with Calhoun on the slave question pending in congress. He said he did not think it produce a dissolution of the Union, but if it should, the south would be far from necessity compelled to form an alliance, offensive and defensive, with Great Britain.”[2] What Calhoun was saying was that he doesn’t think slavery will cause separation of the Union, but if it did, the south would not be required by force to make a coalition with Great Britain. Their answer was the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This had allowed for Missouri to enter the state as a slave state. Many like Calhoun believed that slavery was an institution that benefited all and supported the south with their minority rights (slave institution /pro-slavery). Although the Missouri Compromise had helped the the southerners reassure their say in government, Maine entered as a free state and prohibited slavery in the remainder of the Louisiana Purchase, this generated concern in the south about the north controlling the federal government, and potentially threatening the slave

Related Documents