Prosecutorial Misconduct Research Paper

Improved Essays
Prosecutorial Misconduct has always been a problem in the courtroom. Prosecutors tend to misuse evidence and go against someone that may be innocent. That innocent person’s life could be turned upside down for something they didn’t even do. Imagine being blamed for your significant other’s murder, and then being sentenced to life in prison just for someone to uncover evidence that you didn’t do it after ten years! This would all have been caused by prosecutorial misconduct. Prosecutorial misconduct is a “mistake” that happens quite often in a courtroom; withheld or not approved evidence is being used on a possibly innocent suspect. This is something that definitely needs to stop.

What is prosecutorial misconduct, you may ask? It is when a prosecutor fails to provide the right evidence in the attempt to sway the jury and convince them
…show more content…
Since they are the ones handling they evidence, they are the ones that are mostly to blame. They are the ones responsible for turning in the appropriate evidence, especially the ones that are going to prove a suspect to be innocent. The suspects, of course, would have to be involved because they are the ones that are going to be affected if something goes wrong. The suspects are the ones that are going to jail or even to be killed because of something they didn’t do. It would be the prosecutor’s fault. Then there is the jury. The one that is often tricked by the prosecutor so the suspect can go to jail, or worse. They are the ones that make the big decision on what is going to happen overall. The jury is the one that was not shown what it was supposed to see by the prosecutor. This is just some of the people involved. Just think of the families that are involved, especially of the possibly innocent suspect. They are the ones that have to deal with the stress and grief over what might possibly happen in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Dennis Fritz Case Summary

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The police and detectives are so focused on trying to show the general public that the crimes have been solved and someone has been punished for their actions that they clearly overlook unmistakable errors in the crime solving process. After being told to treat the convenience store like a crime scene the officer on site still allowed the manager to clean up the store. During interrogations cameras were never turned on until the interrogating officers had broken the suspect enough to the point that they felt they had to confess in order to receive any type of break. They would then turn on the cameras just long enough to get the confession on tape. Even after they had their confessions, that the wrongfully taken, they still didn't see/ overlooked the discrepancies in the multiple party confessions.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This comment was made in reference to the widely perceived lenient sentence Torres received for the murder of Don’s son. Fairfax County initially offered a $2.95 million settlement to Geer’s two daughters before Torres’s internal affairs files went public (Jackman, 2016). In terms of Virginia police misconduct cases, this settlement is one of the largest offers ever made. The starting point for determining which crimes were available to select from for this paper began on George Mason University’s Blackboard website.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Casey Anthony Case Summary

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This made the court and criminal justice system question the discretion of the police officer who worked on the crime scene. There was certainly misconduct presented by OJ Simpson when he led police officers into a high speed chase…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oj Simpson Case Study

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The defense used information in the trial such as the police enter OJ Simpson's home without a warrant therefore violating his 4th amendment rights. The judge then had to void all of the evidence found at the home including the glove. The defense also collected a good group of jurors that had suspicions with the Los Angeles Police Department, most of them being african american. The prosecution tried to argue that all of OJ’s abusive actions were linked throughout the years.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In class we did a trial on ‘’ The Ransom Of Red Chief “. Prosecutors and Defense teams had good enough evidence they needed to support their case but they could've had a little more. Although , the most credible evidence defense had was when they brought bags of hair of the kitties Red Chief had killed. On the other hand , prosecutors had a rope and sack that Sam and Bill tried to kidnap Red Chief in also known as Johnny. While supporting their evidence and giving statements about their case , prosecutors had won.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prosecutorial functions such as initiating judicial proceedings, evaluating evidence, and preparing presentations before a grand jury or trial are entitled to absolute immunity. Buckley, 509 U.S. at 272-273. Additionally, it distinguished between the tasks performed by a prosecutor preparing for trial and those of a detective investigating a crime in order to establish probable cause to arrest a suspect. Id. at 273. The Court also concluded that a prosecutor may only receive qualified immunity where he or she offers legal advice to police about an unarrested suspect.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    OJ Simpson: The Prosecution The year 1994, was like any other year. The movies The Lion King and Forest Gump were released, the shows Friends and Sister to Sister had started and other musical acts came to light while others pasted. 1994, was going smoothly so far until the summer of ‘94, the world from that moment forward would witness the most shocking, jaw-dropping case of it’s time, the murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman and the conspiracy that OJ Simpson, the beloved football star, the black man who “made it,” and the brilliant father, killed Nicole and Ron. Throughout the trial it became evident that the prosecution was too overconfident about their conviction of OJ. “If it doesn't fit, you must acquit.”…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Avery And Dassey's Trial

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    and he was seething with anger having to even provide this vindication to essentially clear two officer’s names. The eighth principle is the right of the defendant to be brought before a court. This was proven throughout the documentary; Avery and Dassey’s rights to a public trial by jury were upheld. This is corresponded with our seventh amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which is the right of the accused to a trial by jury, these are due process rights.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duke Lacrosse Case Study

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Therefore, the implosion of this case is a clear example of the power the prosecutor has and how political ambition and calculation can tempt…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Terry Edwards Trial

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Abhilash Gogineni Tinoco English 1A 3 March 2017 What Determines if You are Guilty or Not? Currently around the world, there have been many topics circulating about race, such as the Black Lives Matter movement. This movement promotes minority justice by trying to reduce the number of police brutalities in society.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Skilling Case

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One conceivable pattern in prosecutorial watchfulness that educators and legal counselors are nearly viewing originates from the result of Skilling v. United States. In June the Supreme Court put aside the conviction of Enron official Jeffrey Skilling. This choice spoke to the most noteworthy push-again on the development of professional wrongdoing in late memory, says Weisberg, with the Court basically voiding the legislature's hypothesis as illegally ambiguous (see Point of View, page 36). "Skilling reflected a worry that we've gone past prosecutorial carefulness to a domain of deficient notice, accordingly raising established issues," says Gilliam. "There's surely a groundswell in courts to truly investigate the legislature's choices more now than generally."…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American criminal justice system enforces our laws and keeps watch over us but who is watching over the system? Oversight over the system may after all, be less than optimal going by various criminal cases tainted by prosecutorial misconduct resulting in wrongful convictions. From law enforcement, the elected officials, the court system, to corrections, prosecutorial misconduct gained notoriety because of the absolute immunity they enjoy. According to Silverglate, (2000), “We now live in a time of sharply decreasing faith in the criminal justice system.” This decreasing faith might not be unconnected to the egregiously bad behavior that dots the criminal justice landscape.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An example that is able to be critiqued for such errors in investigative processes is that of the O.J. Simpson case…

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What was once an adversarial adjudicative process controlled by judges and juries has been reduced to an administrative mechanism dominated by prosecutors through the exercise of unbridled discretion. Prosecutors and law enforcement officials are not supposed to use their power to rack up guilty pleas or convictions, because they are not advocates for one side in an adversarial process; they are public officials charged with pursuing justice (Graham,…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Functions Of Trial By Jury

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Trial by Jury What is a Jury? – A jury can be simply defined as a body of people that are sworn to give a verdict on a particular matter that is submitted to them. Also a jury is a group of people that attends in judgement not only upon the accused but also upon the justice and humanity of the law. Role of a jury – The jury fulfils a very important function in the legal system.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays