Kantianism Vs Utilitarianism Essay

Superior Essays
Abortion has long presented a real-world ethical issue that invokes many differing viewpoints on the morality of terminating a fetus during a pregnancy. While modern medicine and technology now allow women to undergo an abortion based on their own will and need in many countries, that does not necessarily make the act of abortion ethically correct. The optimal manner of examining this issue is through the application of different moral philosophical theories—in this case, Kantianism and Utilitarianism. While the two theories offer essentially opposite views on the issue, I find that Utilitarianism offers a superior answer to the moral question of abortion because it offers a more nuanced approach to understanding, justifying, and resolving the ethical issues of abortion. Kantianism is the moral philosophical theory of Immanuel Kant. Kant’s theory hinges on the belief that moral laws can be derived from reason, therefore making all immoral behavior unreasonable or irrational. Kantianism utilizes the idea of the categorical imperative—that is, a law of morality that all humans have a duty to obey. Kant believed that all moral decisions can be made with the aid of the categorical imperative. Kant’s first formulation of the categorical imperative states: an action is morally right if and only if the agent can consistently will it to be a …show more content…
Therefore, persons wishing to act in an ethically sound manner should strive to bring about the greatest possible amount of happiness for the greatest possible number of people. Similarly, people incapable of making choices that produce happiness should instead strive to create the least amount of unhappiness. Utilitarianism is focused on the outcome of a person’s actions. That is, it is a theory that concerns itself with consequences of an actor’s choice in a given situation rather than the actions in

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is an approach to ethics that states that utility, also known as happiness, is inherently desirable. It examines the consequences of actions rather than the act itself, and maintains…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Terri Shiavo

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis of “The Schiavos” and “Fetal Testing for Down Syndrome” Terri Schiavo was a young woman in a persistent vegetative state (PSV) for nearly 13 years. Her husband fought to have her feeding tube removed to allow her to die naturally, yet her family contested his fight, claiming that Terri responded and interacted with them. Although her autopsy results confirmed what her husband argued. Terri suffered from blindness, and the inability to communicate, or interact. Yet her family continued to contest that she interacted with them, (Schiavo Autopsy).…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People who are mentally ill and commit crimes are able to get therapy rather than be punished. There are multiple ideologies that argue whether or not therapy should be an option. For example, the idea of Utilitarianism is to promote the greatest amount of happiness possible. In this essay, I will be arguing that Utilitarianism supports the idea of therapy because it brings greater happiness for the many, it allows society to help those who refused to be helped, and there is no “right” and “wrong” in treating those who don’t want to be treated. Utilitarianism’s main focus is to do whatever brings about the most happiness and do least of whatever brings unhappiness.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is one of the most addressed ideologies in ethics. Blackburn explains this ideology as: “It concentrates upon general well-wishing or benevolence, or solidarity or identification with the pleasures and pains or welfare of people as a whole” (Blackburn, 86). To expand on this quote, the basic goal of utilitarians is to have the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people in a society. (Blackburn, 82). It focuses on actions that are morally right and forward-looking.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the ethical dimensions postulated by Kant, Mill, and Aristotle, it is evident that abortion is an immoral act because it is not associated with the concept of good will. The morality and ethics of abortion can be assessed based on Kant’s philosophy…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While walking down the side of the road, you come across a person who seems to have tattered clothing, an unbathed demeanor, holding a sign that says “Anything Helps”. Does one have a moral obligation to help this person, or is it out of our scope of moral obligation? This difference between moral obligation differs between Utilitarianism and the Kantian approach. According to the Utilitarian theory of moral obligation, their duty is to do what will bring the most good and resolve the most amount of pain. Simply put, whatever would bring the most amount of happiness to the most amount of people is morally good.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believes morality is based on duty and duty is reasoning without a motive, obligation or desire. Kant believes that humans can only decide what is moral through reasoning.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism Utilitarianism principles support the idea that decisions must be based on what will benefit the largest number of people. Each person’s actions are added to the overall utility of the community impacted by those actions. Utilitarianism is focus on the net result of their actions instead of the means or motives that generated the reason for their actions. It is doing by intrinsic rewards which the personal satisfaction from benefiting others.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In concordance with this theme, the actual procedure necessary to perform an abortion is painful, resulting in an increase in pain to the fetus (“Utilitarian”, n.d.). This contradicts one of the fundamental principles of utilitarianism, to increase pleasure and to avoid pain. In addition, utilitarianism places great emphasis on maximizing utility. The very purpose of abortion is to end a human life, which reduces overall utility by impeding the natural reproduction process and therefore inhibiting further population. This is counterintuitive to the utilitarian code of ethics.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant is a firm believer of duty based ethics, meaning that one’s morality is defined by ones motives. Thus, Kant believes that an action should be performed simply because it’s the right thing to do, and for no other reason. Also, Kant states that duty defines intrinsic value, meaning that a person’s motives for what they do should have ends within themselves, without consequences or desired satisfaction being built into their actions. Kant also states the one should act so that the maximum of your action can and should be made into universal law, expressing that the actions of your motives should apply to everyone in the same way. Thus, bringing us to the fact that action from duty has to be an categorical imperative, meaning that everyone should and would be able to act the same way, sharing equal positioning.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the branch of normative ethics, a person discerns what is right or wrong behavior. There are several theories about what is right or wrong conduct, but two of the most popular ideas is Utilitarianism and Kantianism. Both set up strict methods of deciding how a person would know what the right thing to do in a situation would be. On one hand, utilitarianism claims that you can use intuition to discern what the greatest good for the greatest number of people is. On the other side, Kantianism claims that you can use reasoning and logic to discern moral obligations and rules.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays