Pros And Cons To Torture

Improved Essays
GROUP DISCUSSION BOARD FORUM 2 INSTRUCTIONS
To Torture or Not to Torture

Ethical Controversies: Torture

In this discussion I will interpret Holmes’ approaches to the moral decision for the use of torture in obtaining information from suspected terrorists or those with knowledge of terrorist activities among the theory Utilitarianism, Kantian duty-based ethics, Virtue ethics, Christian-principle based ethics.

The Utilitarianism ethicist would support torture as justifiable. Utilitarianism, is a form of consequentialism, therefore we must look at the consequences or end results. If the Security forces is allowed to torture captured terrorists there is high degree of probability that vital information will be obtain and the attack stopped.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jessica Wolfendale discusses what permitting torture would involve realistically in her work Training Torturers: A Critique of the “Ticking Bomb” Argument. The hypothetical ticking bomb argument fails to distinguish a justification of the general practice and individual instances of torture. She refers to the discussion as “a new war in which moral constraints do not apply”, for to allow torture is to allow the training of torturers. Historically they have been chosen for obedience, trustworthiness, political beliefs, and endurance of pain. Torturers would have to be trained in interrogational torture.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “A Case for Torture,” Michael Levin makes the erroneous claim that torture is permissible because he does not address the countless legal issues connected to the controversy. Instead of choosing to include verifiable facts that disprove the legitimacy of torture, Levin manipulates his readers’ emotions through the use of pathos, the fabrication of improbable tragedies, and unsourced studies. Levin’s “A Case for Torture” is purposely flawed in hopes of convincing his audience to join him in advocating for…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of the cuts (which may be reversed) made by the Obama Administration the reality is that the damage of the C.I.A. Detention and Interrogation Program is done. Hundreds have suffered under the program and the lasting psychological damage to many victims is severe and irreversible. Furthermore, the credibility of the C.I.A. to the American public and the U.S. government itself has been diminished because of their falsely reported information and excessive utilization of brutal interrogation tactics. Even today, the effects can be seen and the damage is still unfolding; the possibility that these tactics may be revived or even expanded under the Trump Administration is a frightening possibility.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Bowden Torture

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is a thin line between torture, coercion, and persuasion. For some countries, torture is an adequate form of punishment used to not only instill fear, but to also show the consequences of prohibited actions to others. However, for the United States and other countries who have signed the Geneva Convention, torture is strictly prohibited, but is still practiced in different forms. The article “The Dark Art of Interrogation,” written by Mark Bowden, explores various interrogation techniques used throughout the War on Terror by the United States Military, the Israeli government, and the New York City Police force. Each of the agencies consistently agreed that using “hard torture” was “the classic shortcut for a lazy or incompetent investigator”(…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Suppose a terrorist has hidden a bomb in Time’s Square which will detonate at noon on June 16 unless officials follow his demands for money and release of his friends from jail. Suppose, that he is caught at 10 a.m on that terrible day, but he would prefer death to failure. He won't tell where the bomb is. What do officials do? If they are to follow the constitutional process they would wait for his lawyer then millions of people will die.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I defend the nature of the balance of civil liberties, rights and torture by drawing upon Jeremy Waldron, Henry Shue and Jeff McMahan’s view on the morality of torture. Torture is the act of deliberately inflicting severe physical or psychological pain to an individual who is restrained and defenseless. Reasons for torture can include punishment, revenge, political re-education, deterrence, interrogation or coercion of the victim or a third party, or simply the sadistic gratification of those carrying out or observing the torture. In this paper I will argue that torture is not morally justified; torture ought not to be legalized or otherwise institutionalized even in the ticking time bomb scenario because the rights of the innocent…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How do you determine if and when the use of torture would be ethical? Let’s begin by examining the views of two well-known philosophers John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. Each of these philosophers had strong opinions and stances on the moral and ethical use of torture. John Stuart Mills’ theory on the ethical of the use of torture is that it is acceptable if it brings happiness and/or pleasure to the majority of people than if the torture were not carried out. One example he gives to support that theory is, if a terrorist has information that will prevent an act of terror that would result in the death of hundreds of innocent people and by obtaining this information thru an act of torture, it would likely save those lives he would agree…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hundreds of years later several countries have signed the “Convention Against Torture” in agreement that torture will not be practiced in their country. As the world had progressed, torture has significantly reduced, however, the concept of torture being wrong and unjust originated several hundred years ago during the…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Desperate Times Would you ever hurt someone? What if hurting that someone meant that you would be seen as a hero amongst many? What if hurting someone meant that you were able to save innocent lives? What if hurting someone meant that you lost a piece of yourself and what it means to be human? `The topic at hand is if it is ever justifiable to torture someone under any circumstance.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Pros And Cons

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Though torture has been prevalent throughout history, the 20th century saw a revival of torture techniques against perceived opponents of the state, and priority was given to state security (Green). The United States found several ways to evade their responsibilities under international law and allow torture to be used as a report by the UN human rights commissioner stated evidence of torture at Guantanamo Bay. The United States was also one of the primary sponsors of a Convention to prohibit torture and to protect human rights. Torture in terms of terrorism, based on the Convention against Torture, can be defined as “the officially sanctioned infliction of intense suffering, aimed at forced exchange of information for the relief of unbearable…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Torture Wrong

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If torture will be the only way to obtain information to prevent the detonation of the atomic bomb in Times Square , torture should be and most likely will be used. What is more important? Human rights terrorists or protecting the lives of our citizens? The Church does not accept torture, two main reasons are: one is human dignity , which prohibits using it in any case .…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Wrong To Torture Wrong

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    overlooked by almost all nations. Under the just war theory, once an enemy surrenders, they are not a threat to you anymore. It pretty much implies that it is wrong to torture and mistreat your enemies under almost any circumstance. As we know, many nations do not abide by this. We hear about prisoners being waterboarded, strapped to a mattress frame and electrocuted, and all sorts of horrible things.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of torture can scare many people. In today’s world torture is now viewed as a thing of the past; a solution to our ancestor’s problems. Yet in reality, the dilemma whether torture should be used or not is still an issue. Many people would automatically say torture should not be allowed, until they are told millions of lives depend on it. Michael Levin is the person that made many readers second guess their answer to that simple, yet difficult question.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin was published in Newsweek in 1982, it has stirred up many debates regarding the universal use of torture. Levin believes that torture is justifiable in extreme cases such as preventing terrorism to save lives. Levin argues by giving examples of make-believe scenarios in which the only two options given are to either meet the demands of the terrorist or to torture the terrorist so that innocent lives can be spared; however, Levin’s argument is flawed because he never fully defines the boundaries which can be placed on the concept of torture that would ensure that the use of torture is not abused. He believes that the best way to address a problem in which one wants an immediate result…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays