Poverty By David Beckman Analysis

1. I think it is very hard to get out of poverty. A person can’t just get up one day and get out of poverty, it would take time. David Beckman is trying to say that; as a nation we have not try hard enough to help those who in need. Poverty is something that can stop, but we have not try hard to help end poverty. We usually blame these people who are living in poverty. We blame them for not having a better life. We called them lazy for not having a better life. We just don’t care about others. We only worry about ourselves. I agree with David Beckman point of view because I think we can stop poverty, but we just don’t put the effort it needs.
2. Food security is related to the cyclical nature of poverty in many ways. Not being able to put food in the table is connected to poverty. Living without eating well is connected to poverty. In my opinion, eating well means being able to eat breakfast, lunch, diner, and being able to eat healthy. When people is living in poverty, they aren’t able to put food in the table, and to eat …show more content…
Most of the kids in the film, were not eating well at all, which is not a good thing. these kids were not really being teach at home to eat healthy because their parents couldn’t afford it or theirs didn’t grew up eating healthy. There was one teacher in the film, who was teaching the kids about eating healthy. She was trying to show them the importance about eating healthy. I think this needs to happen everywhere because not everybody knows about the importance of eating healthy. In my opinion, it is very important for these kids to be educated about eating healthy, but I think it’s more important to provide it to them because when they are home, they aren’t able to eat it. Their families aren’t able to provide it for them. For example, you can’t teach someone how to play soccer without a soccer ball. It’s good to tell the person how to kick the ball, but you would have to give this person a ball to see if the person really understand