Pros And Cons Of Trickle Down Economy

Improved Essays
1: What is Trickle-down economics
Trickle- down economics is the idea that the money that the “Super Rich” spend circulates and promotes growth in the economy and benefits others. It is the theory that the drivers of economic growth are people that are successful in the economy and that from the tax cuts they receive they will spend more of their money in the economy and invest in business’s which will supposedly generate more jobs. Yet if this is in fact true then why is it that the living conditions are still bad and jobs are at an all-time low. It is promoting inequality and creating a bigger divide between the working class citizen and the super-rich. According to research done by (YouTube video) Britain is the only economy that has grown
…show more content…
He introduced the trickle-down effect which was commonly known as “Reaganomics” back then. Since then it has led to a huge gap between the rich and the poor in the US. It has the opposite effect on what is it supposed to do and should be reversed. During a campaign to introduce the idea of trickle-down economics Reagan said he had a “recipe to fix the nation's economic mess”. He believed that tax cuts would enable rich people to spend and invest more which would generate even more revenue for the government. There were mixed opinions on Reagan’s theory. Some people believed that Reaganomics would spark up and cause high inflation and a rise in interest rates. As a result of this between 1981 and 1982 there was a recession in the US. Europe then followed on to imitate what the US had previously done even though there was little or no proof that it even …show more content…
The government feel that if they tax the rich more then the rich will spend less, the objective with the trickle down effect was to make poor people richer and not rich people poor. The government see taxing society as raising revenue which will raise society. A lot of these economic policies are based around the trickle-down theory and it simply does not work therefore they should be reversed. Although the government have yet to make any concrete changes it seems they are trying to re-adjust the tax system, “We want a simpler, fairer tax system that supports those on low and middle incomes while making sure that those who can best afford it make a fair contribution.” (gov.uk

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If the national debt grows, interest rates and how much the government owes increases, and then the government will spend all their resources and money on paying off the debt. The government could use their resources, time, and money on programs, creating new jobs, and helping businesses, but they have to pay off their debt. Interest payments and high interest rates get in the way of the government expanding the economy. Moreover, the national debt slows down economic growth in the private sector with higher interest rates. Therefore, the private sector will have negative outcomes, and the private sector will borrow less money.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first was reducing the growth of government with its spending on both income tax front and capital gains taxes. (Longley, Mayer, Schaller, 2015) The second followed reducing inflation by controlling the growth of the money supply itself. The third issue focused on regulation of supplies and trade within the United States. President Reagan took the position of cutting taxes to companies so that they had more revenue to hire new workers. In this, jobs market would expand all while businesses would become larger have more room for more workers and more need for labor in the general public.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That is to say, the more money in the economy the more customers would buy Aveeno Eczema Therapy. Contracting Monetary Policy: congress and the president create these policies to increase government income while the economy is doing well and to prevent an economic bubble. It is also a policy used by authorities contract the supply of money a deduce economic activities by increasing the interest rate. This is done by a reduction in the money supply in the economy. A higher interest rate would reduce the production and demand of Aveeno eczema therapy as there would be little money in…

    • 1251 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Raising the taxes on the wealthy would be a great option. The goal is not to tax them to the point of taking it all away, but making it fair, especially in times of struggle. Bob Herbert 2010, a New York Times columnist states that,” America does not have the common sense to raise taxes” (qtd. in King 614). I couldn’t agree more with his statement, as it seems like everyone is intimidated to raise taxes on the wealthy, or makes up excuses why we cannot do so.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should The Rich Be Taxed

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With America’s economy struggling, many citizens believe that the rich should be taxed more to help fix the economy. This issue has caused a division between those who believe the rich should be taxed more and those who do not. For example, when voting for presidents, this problem is a major factor of who gets voted into office. The reason that the rich can be taxed without the rest of the country being taxed is, America’s income tax system is set up by using a graduated tax bracket. This means that the more money a person makes, the higher the percentage of money they have to pay.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Tax Debate

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I agree that tax rates on capital gains and dividends should be decreased. Having a high capital gains tax earns the government money but have bad effects on the economy. High capital gains taxes make investing more expensive causing fewer overall…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Efficiency is usually promoted by the government by allocating society’s resources in a way that is most effective and beneficial for society and the economy. Meanwhile, governments promote equity by distributing resources equally, usually by taxing the rich and distributing that money to poorer individuals through welfare policies. Usually though, promoting equity reduces efficiency, as redistributing income from the wealthy to the poor lowers the wealthier individuals’ productivity; they won’t work as hard, resulting in less work and less goods and services produced (Mankiw, 2015). Thus, to get more efficiency, equity has to be sacrificed, and vice…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elasticity Of Demand

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Marshall, who introduced the concept of elasticity in economic theory, remarks that the elasticity or responsiveness of demand in a market is great or small according as the amount demanded increases much or little for a given full in price, and diminishes much or little for a given rise in price” (Chand, Smriti, 2014). Companies use the price elasticity of demand to determine the price of their products and their total sales and revenue. The results from the income elasticity of demand tells companies that during economic recession, they should decrease the production of the luxurious goods because people do not have the income to afford those goods. This can help prevent the surplus of the good and excess of raw materials. The concept of cross elasticity of demand has made advertising and marketing for complementary and substitute goods necessary for companies to create brand loyalty and make demand less sensitive to price.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Douglas A. Irwin argues about the benefits of capitalism in his article titled “The Ultimate Global Antipoverty Program” which explains how capitalism contributed to the “greatest reduction in global poverty in the history of the world” (Irwin 1). According to Irwin, thanks to different previously poor economies switching to a more capitalistic system, there were major declines in poverty and overall economic improvements. The idea of different economies and ways of running governments is very relevant today due to the issues with politics, poverty, and the human quality of life being caused by oppressive, unethical and controlling governments. The article shows that capitalism can help reduce poverty, increase economic growth and wealth,…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wealthy owners can gather savings, and sustain their progressing patterns of income. To adjust this issue Leonhardt, (545), urges “a global wealth tax aimed more directly at capital inequality than income taxes currently are”, as a solution to inequality, however it will apply to those whose incomes are in the millions. Capital gains is the main source profit derives from it, and Leonhardt assumes that taxing capital is a way for the wealthy to pay their fair share in taxes. Although I agree with Leonhardt on taxing capital, I cannot accept his assumption that by doing so will cause much of a difference on the wealthy because they will find other ways to accumulate money without being…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays