Pros And Cons Of Today's Conservative-Based Government

Improved Essays
Source 1 is considerably critical of conservative integrity, so much so that it may have well in fact been written by Rousseau himself. Questioning the moral integrity of those who believe in conservatism, the source blatantly calls out the faults that are present even in today’s conservative based government. Implying that the conservatives are not at all concerned with the common good, the source disparages a well known fact of conservative parties; that their reputation is arguably not the most principle. Since 2006, Harper’s government has done no favours to the conservative reputation, leading the Canadian economy into a spiralling downfall of debt and overspending. Ironically, Harper’s Economic Action Plan had promised to do just the opposite. Harper’s conservative government, promising to ‘spend it’s way to economic growth’, is just the sort of “potentially beneficial” the source would label as the very reason conservatives are linked with a poor …show more content…
Those who follow Rousseau’s ideologies of the common good would also criticize the conservative mindset of the modern Canadian government, hoping for more benefit towards the people themselves and what is in their

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Election night, 1984, brought to an end the era of Liberal domination in the House of Commons, “nearly sixteen consecutive years” (Stevie Cameron 2005, pg. 15). Brian Mulroney, leader of the progressive conservatives, since 1983, (Cameron, pg. 16) swept through the nation obtaining “50 percent of the popular vote” (Professor Lewis). This historic victory was the culmination of a nation’s exhaustion and discontentment with the then current Liberal government (Cameron, pg. 14). The Mulroney administration entered government the same way it exited historically as a direct result of the plutocratic form of governance prevalent during the Mulroney’s administration. Here was a government which had claimed it would clean up Canadian politics (Cameron, pg. 17) when in fact it concerned itself instead with acquiring money by any means possible.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Trudeau rejects the idea that sovereignists at the time, and currently still, wish to achieve, autonomy for Quebec. His timing of the quote during the “Quiet Revolution”, in which Quebecois nationalism was rapidly growing, would've been a clear message to the French Canadians living in Quebec that the Trudeau government at that time was unwilling to subject itself to the notion of an asymmetrical federal system between the provincial government of Quebec and the federal government of Canada. This itself is also ironic as later during the “Quiet Revolution” asymmetrical federalism and a growth in provincial power would be granted to Quebec under the Trudeau government. Trudeau’s stance is directly opposite to the “father” of the “Quiet Revolution”, Jean Lesage, and his perspective what Quebec deserves to be. The perspective in this source should be dismissed because in hindsight and in light of current provincial and federal standings, the granting of asymmetrical federalism and the identification of Quebec as a nation under the Harper government…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    He then goes on to say the support of the middle class does not represent any of these traditional ideological values of the parties. It is quite disconcerting that the political leaders seem to create a large amount of policy based on gaining a target amount of votes from people who do not really need help or do not support the business needs of the country. The suggestion that all political parties only share a single common interest and that that interest is winning the votes of the middle class is really a quite cynical and depressing way of looking at our political system. The author makes a good point that this conversion of policies intended to target specific voters does seem to be happening to a certain extent, but to go so far as to say that the parties in Canada do not hold ideological values in their policies is a little bit of an…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    President Bush entered office in 2001 tasked with continuing the articulation of Reagan conservatism, an effort begun by his father before him. An orthodox innovator, George W. Bush was tasked with perpetuating the principles of Reagan under different and extraordinary circumstances (Montagne, 2005). Conceived in the wake of arguably the biggest tragedy in American history, Bush wielded expanded executive power and thus possessed and an exceptional opportunity to increase the relevancy of the conservative regime. However, administration blunders such as the 2003 Iraq invasion, ostensible inaction in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and failure to circumvent the 2008 financial crisis ultimately inhibited the Bush administration’s ability to usher in a conservative reawakening. George W. Bush’s domestic agenda, foreign policy and penchant to turn to Reagan prescriptions in novel circumstances demonstrates his classification as a president engaged in the politics of articulation.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the past decades and presently, Quebecers have been known for their ongoing loyalty and strong devotion to their nation including their dying culture. Quebec’s advocacy of political independence from Canada, i.e. nationalism, has been significantly influential in shaping Canadian politics in the past and present. Nationalism has not only heavily influenced culture and politics in Quebec but more importantly has influenced politics in the Canadian nation as a whole. It is safe to say that Nationalism has led to various changes in the constitution, some of which are beneficial and some causing controversial debate. With Quebec putting a great effort and many its resources in it’s attempt to protect the French language, this ultimately…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The role of the government is greatly important as it has a huge impact in changing the life of the citizens in the country. However, to make a change in the country, the government must take a step forward to truly attempt to do so. Pierre Elliot Trudeau has helped to construct Canada of today to be the way it is by taking that step, by which many Prime Ministers were afraid to take. He has allowed the fixated perspective of others to gradually change. Thus, Pierre Trudeau’s policies demonstrates to be beneficial for Canada.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This publication was more accomplishing than the First Discourse; its content was what made Rousseau fall into the category of an Enlightenment thinker. The start of Rousseau developing his theories of “human social development and moral psychology”(Stanford Encyclopedia) can be seen. Rousseau discusses about two types of inequality: moral and natural (or physical). In the first half of the Discourse of Inequality, “The natural man is well balanced by his two trends, pity (which pushes it to the other) and self-preservation (which isolates). In marital status, laws and virtues play the roles of these two instincts” (Tim).…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The theorist in this book sets out to show that penalization alone is not the answer to our current crime problems. Loïc Wacquant states that law and order and the penal system have distorted reality and created a crime issue. This claim asserts that the state has convinced the people that there is a crisis in the country and its was and is caused by the welfare state. According to the state the assistance given to the needy is causing the country to experience more crime the ideas of neoliberalism will change all that. The ideas of governmental neoliberalism consist of privatization of public systems such as the penal system, education, health and others.…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Rousseau’s argument, men cannot be as free as they are in the state of nature in modern society and asserts that that institutions and structures in modern society contradict the freedom and natural goodness of man. Yet, a specific government may be able to provide its members with a certain amount of freedom that somewhat amounts to that present in the state of nature. He writes, in regards to the role of government, “Find a form of association which defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and by means of which each one, while uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau, 148). The ultimate goal of the government is to ensure the natural freedom of its societal members. The law put forth from the government should be a reflection of the general will of the community.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau believes that a social contract is needed in order to preserve the community as it is becoming hard for everyone to survive on their resources…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rousseau And Religion

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Rousseau sees man in the regular state as a "noble savage", which means that Individuals will be willing to comply instead of disagreeing. Society, he contends, has defiled man. He considers violence to be a consequence of political life and its organizations. Rousseau is exceptionally disparaging of governments, and one could contend this to be a consequence of his consideration of pre-revolutionary France. A government’s function ought to be to aim for a unified society.…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau considers a legitimate government to be one that “defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and, by means…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Rousseau differ in their ideas on the state of nature, Hobbes has a negative view, while Rousseau believes we were better off in the state of nature. The basis for their different ideas on the state of nature contribute to their diverging ideas on their accounts of government by social contract. Hobbes argues for citizens relinquishing their authority to the state, while Rousseau contends for the sovereign authority to be in the hand of the citizens. I will argue that Rousseau makes a more convincing argument because it is one of compromise rather than extremism. Hobbes’ account of government by social contract is based on the basic principle and rational that people give up some of their rights in order to feel secure.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau stood firm in his belief of what the right form of government would look like or at least appear to be, but also argues that people are surrendering rights and freedom to themselves while establishing a civil society. In the reading A World of Ideas; Jean-Jacques Rousseau “The Origin of Civil Society” by Lee Jacobus, they briefly describe what kind of arguments and challenges he had faced from opposing famous philosophers ' beliefs. Some of which including those who played a role in aiding the development of the type of government seen in America today. In the book Jacobus…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays