Pros And Cons Of Third Parties

Improved Essays
In recent discussions of third party campaigns, a controversial issue has been whether third parties hurt the presidential campaign. On the one hand, some argue that they help get the people’s concerns be heard to the two major parties. On the other hand, however, others argue that it ends up having the focus away from other problems. In sum, then, the issue is if voters are better off with more choices or that third parties are unnecessary.

While some believe that voting for third parties divide the country in a way that hurts us, third party candidates can be useful as they push the people’s views onto the two major parties.

I believe that having a third party candidate can be a good way to express concerns and ideas to the two major parties.

Jeffrey W. Koch, a chairman of the political science and international relations department at State University of New York, speaks about how third parties are important to politics. He claims that third parties are a great way to express the concern of the people to the major parties. “The emergence of a strong third party challenge provides the major parties with information about the electorate that may prompt them to re-define themselves.” This shows the importance of having a third party, as it shows what voters want.

Theresa Amato, who
…show more content…
In the article Third Parties Have Divided, Rather Than Unite, Us, by Ro Elleithee, he explains that third parties just makes voting more difficult, that it splits votes where it messes up the balance between the other two parties’ votes. “We’ve tried the whole third party approach. But throughout history, third parties have accomplished one of two things - either splitting the vote and weakening one party while strengthening the other; or further polarizing us by giving a structured voice to an extreme element of society.” Third parties have been hurting America by causing disbalance between the two major

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Electoral College is one of the most commonly criticized and commonly misunderstood systems in electoral politics today. Criticism about the electoral college can be heard from both sides of the aisle, from both Republicans and Democrats. Some say it distorts the will of the people because it can turn a popular vote winner into an electoral college loser. While others say that it is one of the last remaining pillars of the federalist system that our nation was founded on. In Judith Best’s book, “Choice of the People?” she lays out the arguments for and against the Electoral College system and for or against a national popular vote or “direct election”.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Hamilton criticized, and voiced his negative opinions about Thomas Jefferson and James Madison to make himself look better. This type of campaign is still done today. Opposing candidates send out letters, or tell the press bad and most of the time, untrue things about the other. Another example is gerrymandering. Gerrymandering was started to criticize the weaker Political party, it is usually done by the more powerful Political party.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paul Ryan felt personally attacked, and the Republican Party believed that Obama’s speech was perceived as extremely partisan and further deepened the political gap. Therefore, activists increase the amount of tension between the Democratic and Republican party which leads to an increase in polarization over time. Conflict displacement has been replaced by expansion, and political leaders disagree on policies such as civil rights, abortion, LGBT rights, and ensuring jobs for the public. Polarization occurs because the political elites cannot compromise on the political issues discussed. Therefore, events such as the 2013 government shutdown…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By competing in elections parties offer citizens worthwhile options in governance, paths for political contribution, and options to shape their country’s future. Yet, in many countries, political parties disappoint in reacting to citizens’ problems and are thus broadly doubted by the public. When the citesens’ trust in political parties is undermined, the democratic process as whole suffers. In all sustainable democracies, the party system must be fundamental in the fabric of society. Political parties are a main key to any democracy.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The electoral system will be consider as the dependent variable cause depending on the type(s) of system could be causing voter turnout decline . The electoral system has three different formula. When election happens; electoral system matters. The electoral system in place for the country, can have political consequences for the actors, who set up the system. There needs to be time to set the best electoral system for the country.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Partisan polarization occurs when a government is highly divided because they have different views in politics. The American government is highly polarized because of previous events that occurred, as well as laws that have changed, allowing for a polarized government. In this essay we are going to look at how high partisan polarization affects the party in government, party organization, and the party in the electorate. Also how partisan polarization affects the three branches of government, and whether or not party polarization is a good or bad thing. The effects of the increased in partisan polarization, on the party in government begins with the Republican and Democrat party becoming more of a “policy position” to those who identify with one expect for the other to have extremely different political views.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ignoring the wants of my candidates could potentially have very negative effects on my being reelected as a House member. If I do not act in the interest of my constituents, then they may vote for someone who will. Rather than proposing a constitutional amendment to abolish the Electoral College, I would express my support for a modification of the Electoral College. This shows that I have reviewed both the positive and negative consequences of an abolition of the Electoral College, such as the impacts that Schlesinger Jr. describes, such as the positive consequence of the increased urgency for voters to vote and the negative consequence of the party system being…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The layman may argue that the majority 's voice is suppressed in favor of a diluted democracy. If a candidate running for president is able to win the electoral vote yet not win the popular vote, the validity of the Electoral system is questioned. When the majorities voice is suppressed in these situations, why not just trust the will of the majority? The over-encompassing issue is that in pure democracies, bare majorities undermine the principles of a nation by easily tyrannizing the minority. The media’s role in legitimizing the Electoral College is due to the polarizing effect of public opinion.…

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The national attention on those states that have the variability for political competition can cause an imbalance in issues that candidates consider (Grofman & Feld, 2009). These issues would be difficult to dictate in the case of a direct election. In this sense, it is evident that there was a particular purpose for the establishment of the Electoral College that goes beyond dividing votes in a responsible manner among the states. This involves ensuring the stability and the representation of each state. The implications of the Electoral College go well beyond simply ensuring that ill-informed people vote…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not to mention, individuals that lean strongly one way politically understand that letting a third-party candidate choose justices could be devastating. Currently, foreign policy is a large issue. The world right now is tense and waiting with bated breath to see how the U.S. will vote. The decisions we make on foreign policy affect every other country. Voting third-party could lead to a candidate that has less than desirable foreign policy views, on either side, winning.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays