Pros And Cons Of The Single Member Plurality System

Improved Essays
The single member plurality system (also known as, First-Past-The-Post) used in Canadian federal and provincial elections has been examined over several decades to have many strengths but also reveals serious shortcomings and limitations. Governments and parliaments are formed but not well backed by a majority of voters, splitting of votes, strategic voting and coordination failures result in some sort of a gap between the real preferences of Canadian voters and election results, new political parties, like the newly formed Green party, face huge challenges to compete in the political arena, minorities including aboriginals and females are underrepresented, politics of regionalism dominate, participation in politics from different

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    David C. Docherty’s (2002) scholarly journal: The Canadian Senate: Chamber of Sober Reflection or Loony Cousin Best Not Talked About, responds to the continual controversy and debate of the usefulness of the Canadian senate. Docherty’s (2002) article analyzes the current Canadian senate and argues that the senate is a failing Canadian institution because of two democratic deficiencies: the undemocratic nature of senator selection and the inability of senators to represent provinces properly. Docherty analyzes four Senate reforms and answers the question of why these reforms failed, in doing so Docherty lays down a framework for a possible successful senate reform but acknowledges the obstacles in doing so. The reader is provided with the knowledge…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The double majority voting system is hard to achieve, since federation only 8 out of 44 referendums has be successful which was amended in the constitution. One of the most latest referendums which was not successful is the Establish of a republic in 1999. The latest referendum is in 1999 which shows why the australian constitution is also in need of urgent reform since it has not been changed. This would lead to the country not achieving social cohesion, one of the ways to achieve social cohesion is to adapt to the meet changing circumstances and values. Adapting to changing circumstances which is provided by the law mechanism.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this democratic nation, we have the right to vote, and in this election, which had the longest campaign in history, people all across Canada exercised their right to vote and elected a liberal majority government with Justin Trudeau as the Prime Minister of Canada. There were five main parties that campaigned for office; The Conservative Party of Canada, which was led by Steven Harper, earned 99 seats, The Liberal Party of Canada, which was led by Justin Trudeau, earned 184 seats, The New Democratic Party of Canada, which was led by Thomas Mulcaire, earned 44 seats, The Bloc Québécois Party, which was led by Gilles Duceppe, earned 10 seats, and The Green Party of Canada, which was led by Elizabeth May, earned 1 seat. There…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hamza Jeter 4/28/17 Professor Roxas Political Science Single Member District Vs Proportional Representation The two most popular and most used types of voting systems are single member districts and proportional representation. A single member district is a voting system with a predetermined constituency that elects a single individual to some place in office. A proportional representation is a voting system used to elect an assembly or group of people.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Representative Democracy is the form of government used in Canada by which all qualified citizens have the right to elect a representative they believe will best represent their ideal rulers for the country. However, votes are not part of the Canadian political system. Long time ago, Canada’s government only had three referendums which are prohibition, conscription, and whether to accept the Charlottetown Accord, but then Canada’s voting system was not made this way. An electoral system is the procedure wherein qualified voters decide on who they want the representative to be.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1980 Quebec Referendums

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A crucial aspect of any political question is the demographic regarding the issue. A referendum is a vote performed by the affected public relating to a specific issue. Therefore, the 1980 and 1995 Quebec referendums about pursuing sovereignty greatly rely on the general public’s view. Upon analysis of the results of both votes, it is clear that independence for Quebec should not be granted. In the 1980 referendum, in which 84.3 percent of the Quebec population voted, 59.5 percent of voters were opposed to the idea of Quebec seceding from Canada, leaving the remainder 40.5 percent in favor of the idea (“1980 Referendum”).…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Electoral College Faulty

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The latest discrepeancy between the two voting systems revived the debate about the best election method. George C. Edwards develops the argument about how the Electoral College, with a faulty system detrimental to democracy, should be replaced with direct election. The Electoral College fails in protecting American citizens and candidates. It does not protect minorities or third parties.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The three government systems majority, coalition and minority all have their own limitations and benefits. A majority system is a single party where only one member is elected out of a constituency; [a specified area of voters who elect a person to represent them legislatively] the most adequate person should be elected to represent the constituency. This system is very common and they can do what they want to. It is easier to pass bills and do not have to worry about the opposition. The minority system consist of many different parties where that one party does not have more than 50% of the power.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are significant flaws with the electoral districts, candidates do not have to win a majority in order to win the election and this system encourages tactical voting. With over 60% of voters not being represented by the current majority government, the process of reforming the electoral system should begin soon to give these people a voice in their government (“Results of the Canadian federal election,…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism In Canada

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The move to actualize some type of electoral change is politically divisive. Since change stands to influence the quantity of seats each party wins in an election, the move to some system can seemingly profit at least one parties above others. Now and again, proposition have surfaced for changes to Canada's electoral system. More often than not, these include some variation of proportional representation, albeit some have contended for a particular ballot to guarantee that applicants chose have the support of a larger part of voters. At the government level, these have dependably been rejected.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Canadian Senators Essay

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thesis Statement While Senators are appointed, it does a notable disservice rejecting our Canadian public. In spite of the historical appointment process selection, the future of Canada should pursue changes toward a democratic electoral system because it enhances democracy, by improving and developing the regional representation system, and by impacting the individual’s participation and accountability. Explain the problem in your own words (2-3 sentences) Because Senators are appointed, there has been political partisanships which influence the functioning of the political body in the Senate. This is ultimately because of the selection process is arguably biased in favor of the party representative and unelected officials may not be legitimate…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Debates about the Canadian electoral system are in no way new, with concerns being specifically brought to light as more people are concerned about the fairness of the current system to minority groups,…

    • 1759 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pluralism is described as, “an open, participatory style of government in which many difference interests are represented.” In the eyes of many pluralism is a good idea because it gives people the opportunity to share their opinion and wants of the public in a political perspective. While yes, many support this idea, there are a few who doubt it. Just like any other idea there will be flaws and the author clearly states what those flaws are in terms of pluralism. The two main theories are demosclerosis and the power elite theory.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First-Past-The-Post system (FPTP) is currently used to elect representatives to the House of Commons. It is true that FPTP is an efficient and simple way of voting that has been trusted for years. Nevertheless, FPTP discriminates against minority parties and leads to non-accurate election results. The large amount of wasted votes is also a major criticism associated with the FPTP system. Recently, the Alternative Vote System is recognized as a way to increase fairness and improve election results.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two different systems of a democratic government, parliamentary and presidential, which are seen in multiple countries across the world. World powers such as the Canada and the United Kingdom thrive with their parliamentary system while the United States of America has shown stability and power with their presidential system. While both parliamentary and presidential systems have benefits and drawbacks, parliamentary systems are evidently more democratic because it gives majority of its power to the people by allowing them to call for a vote of no confidence and not setting maximum limits to prime minister term periods. This paper will compare and contrast the two democratic systems, discuss the benefits and critiques of each and finally examine why…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays