Pros And Cons Of The Right To Bear Arms

Improved Essays
A topic that has been going around for a while is the right we were given years ago. Many people are against it, yet a lot are for it. Which side should we side with? There are many pros and cons that go with this debate. The right to bear arms is also known as the 2nd Amendment, meaning it was an add-on to the constitution. Many people would like to get rid of this amendment but a lot do want this amendment.

First off, guns are considered a right, and are used for multiple reasons. One of these reasons is personal protection. According to Connect Us, reason two, “...own firearms for self defense or protection whenever they are physically or offensively tracked by other people.” This proves that according to the law, people have the right to protect themselves from armed robbers, or other threats. Also, having a gun is a way for public safety. According to Vision Launch, reason one, “Moreover, a published journal stated that about 55.5% of criminals often retreat when they see that their victims draw out guns.” Showing that owning a gun and having it in a moment of need can save lives, plus if the criminal is part of the 44.5% that does not retreat, you have a chance to
…show more content…
As stated on Vision Launch, “...the Second Amendment only gives an individual the right own guns if they are enlisted in the military service and it did not specify that a private citizen can use a gun for personal use and self-defense.” This shows that a private citizen can not own a gun for they may not have the experience needed. Also, owners of guns were more likely to be put into violence, according to Connect Us, “people carrying a gun for self-defense were 4.5 times more likely to be shot during an assault than those without a gun in the same situation.” This means that just because you have a gun does not mean you are safer from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bear Arms Dbq

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Due to the human nature of self-defense, sport, and surviving, the second amendment will always remain relevant in society. Although there are many regulations as to who can own a gun, where they are allowed, and requiring a permit to carry and concealed weapon, the second amendment still protects and grants the right of the militia and citizens to “keep and bear arms”. In order to ensure that the government couldn’t take away the citizens firearms, the founding fathers preserved their right to self-defense with the ratification of the second amendment on December 15, 1791. In today's society, Americans are still trying to defend their right to bear arms.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are now 14 states with constitutional carry laws. Constitutional carry is the ability to carry a firearm without a conceal carry permit, it is also known as a permitless carry. The remaining states, their laws concerning conceal carry permits break two constitutional amendments; the second amendment and the 14th amendment of the U.S. constitution. The second amendment states, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. " The most compelling part of this is amendment is the right to "keep and bear arms.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Steve Nolan’s article “25 Reasons Why We Need To Preserve Our 2nd Amendment Right To Keep And Bear Arms,” he explains why we should bear arms, and why we should fight to keep our civil liberty to bear arms. This essay is intended to help the reader become more informed on the right to bear arms, how the media only covers gun related incidents, but not instances where guns have saved people, and how many politicians contort the 2nd amendment to aid them in elections. By uncovering some truths about gun owners, Nolan and many other pro-gun activist can shed some light on the truth behind the 2nd amendment. Nolan can affectively argue ones right to the 2nd amendment through studies, statistics, and personal experiences to produce evidence that supports the right to bear arms. The second amendement of the constitution expresses the right for American citizens to bear, or posess guns.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The root of the debate is to whether or not the Second Constitutional Amendment is meant to protect an individual’s right to bear arms. The real question is do American citizens have the right to bear arms? If they bear this right then to what extent and what kind should be allowed. With the advancements in weaponry in modern times American citizens should have the right to certain arms for their own protection, but not the right to all weapons available. While the legality of ownership has been upheld this far for citizens in the United States the technology of weaponry has certainly changed.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fundamental rights are granted through the Constitution of the United States, and are a part of our liberty and freedom. Also, The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words the right to bear arms should not be taken away from anyone. Opponents of gun control consider the right to bear arms in some sense a fundamental right, and having those rights taken away is unconstitutional. Although the Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, it doesn’t protect against felons possessing a firearm.…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment, is a very controversial area under discussion in the media. Both advocates for and against gun ownership have been lobbying Congress to gain legislation in their favor for decades. Congress is at a standstill over gun issues and has voted down all proposals on gun control in the legislature. Although regulation is useless against criminals some harm can be avoided through tougher unified gun control, the American people have a Second Amendment right to bear arms, nevertheless regulators must decide who should be allowed ownership of what guns and if any training should be required among other issues, regulation must be clearly defined in order to protect society from needless harm. Proponents of gun control have debated that the Second Amendment only applies to members of militias and does not apply to individual…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why? Because of the uncertainty of whether you have a gun or not. Everyone with a gun will have a way to defend themselves, should anything happen to them. Criminals will still have access to guns, they don’t listen to the law anyways. During an ATF investigation of 3,083 gun dealers, they found 12, 274 “missing” firearms.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Regardless of the form of gun control, it takes away our right to own guns; the Second Amendment of the Constitution. In contradiction to what several politicians say how firearm related events and deaths are at an all time high, it is actually at the lowest it has ever been in over twenty years. According to data provided by CNN, the number of non fatal firearm related incidents has decreased by a whopping seventy five percent while…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States is a nation where individual rights are guaranteed and practiced to some extent. For example, the amendments created by the United States government have raised questions and doubts in many individual’s minds where an answer is nowhere to be found. As stated in 2nd amendment “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” This has become a controversial issue all around the United States of America. Although some people may believe that guns should be banned, in reality the right to be armed should not be ceased because it provides protection and it reveals to the American Citizens that their rights are guaranteed.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states:” A well- regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” - https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment. This means that people can own guns and weapons in the United States. The Second Amendment was added to the Constitution, with the help of James Madison, on December 15, 1791 from the Bill of Rights. This Amendment came through the English men. Many men owned guns to defend themselves and their families, and also in some cases, to get food.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Founding Fathers of the United States wrote the Second Amendment to the Constitution for a reason; to protect the rights of the people. This means that citizens have the privilege and ability to possess a gun and use than gun for lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. The government has no right to restrict them in owning guns for this reason. Further amending the right to own a gun would only do more harm than good in the United States. By creating stricter gun control laws, the government would not solve the problem of criminals obtaining weapons and would only take away the protection of the people.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibited the sale of guns to several types of individuals consisting of minors, people with criminal records, disabled, illegal aliens, dishonorably discharged military personnel and others. In 1993 the Act was changed by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This Act said that background checks for all unlicensed carriers had to be done before they could purchase any firearms from a licensed dealer. However, there has been discussion that there is a “gun show loophole” in the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 which allows all people, including convicted felons, the ability to purchase guns without a background check. While many people have decidedly formed opinions on gun control, the debate is complicated…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays