Pros And Cons Of The Mongols

Improved Essays
World History offers many historical leaders to discuss in terms of merit and effectiveness. From Ramesses the Great to Hammurabi, from Julius Caesar to Liu Bang, or from Winston Churchill to Ronald Reagan each offered something more to the treasure trove of antiquity. Some achieve greatness through idolization, some by terror, and most by a usually uneven combination of both. The Mongols of the Post-Classical Era assimilate into that final category. With storied leaders such as Chinggis and Khubilai Khan, Mongolian history flows with rich details about excellence in battle and life. Though a few consider them barbaric beings sharing a metaphorical prison cell with the Nazis, Soviets, and Khmer Rouge, the Mongols are much more sophisticated …show more content…
Chinggis was not the only Mongol leader to seek order and structure in the Mongolian empires. Later, Khubilai Khan and the Yuan dynasty, “…built canals to improve transportation and communication,” (Doc. J) as stated by Charles J. Halperin in his publication Russia and the Golden Horde. It may not be the most reliable information on its own, but given that it is widely accepted historical fact that past Chinese rulers built and expanded on the canal systems in place, it is reasonable to believe the Mongols could have done it as well. If that proves true, the canals would be another example of how the Mongols were able to expand infrastructure and overall structure in the post-classical world. Not only were the Mongols able to impact physical structure, but they also laid out various social guidelines worthy of much discussion. Khubilai Khan attempted through many of his policies to spread equality among various religious and ethnic groups in his society. This can be seen by his way of tolerating various religions within his empire and by providing benefits for those groups. According to Morris Rossabi, author of Kubilai Khan: His Life and Times, in between the years of 1261-1264, “Kubilai [sic] increasingly [gave] Moslems [sic] positions of authority in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols are barbaric because they are strategic, brutal, and they are conquers. The Mongols are barbaric because they are strategic with their plan of attack. In document 3 it states that “When they are to join battle, they draw all the battles lives just as they are (about) to fight.” They send people a group of people of other nationalities to meet with the enemy head-on and these people…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They were known to be the most barbaric tribe in the world, due to their conquests achievements and their military organization. Even though the Mongols was just a nomadic tribe, they had a really effective military organization. All men over age fourteen were soldiers, equipped with composite bows and a large quiver(Doc B). All males from the tribe were trained, and ready…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The benefits of the Mongol rule influenced more than just Asia, but the entire world. China had not been unified for over 300 years (section 12.3 in the textbook) until the Mongols founded…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    DBQ On Modern Day Mongols

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Modern Day Mongols ~ The Mongols could be your worst nightmare destroying your village and killing all your family and friends or your best friend keeping you safe and making sure you had everything you needed but thats depending on whose side you were on. The Mongols were somewhat barbaric warriors that lived in the 13th century and took over most of Asia, The Middle East and Eastern Europe using barbaric Tactics. Even though the Mongols had barbaric tendencies they also protected their own. The Mongols were barbaric because they were an army that killed without remorse. They served the heads of the slain from their bodies and heaped them up in piles {Document 4}.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: How Barbaric were the "Barbarians"? Although Mongols were strikingly ruthless through their military tactics (Doc. 2, 3,4,5), they were able to develop a rather sophisticated society (Doc. 7, 9, 10) and executed noteworthy and structured accomplishments (Doc. 1, 6, 8). As shown in documents 2, 3, 4, and 5, the Mongolians are quite infamous for their questionable harshness considering their military techniques.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mongols Dbq Essay

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Because of his growing reputation, Temujin gained dependents and was able to defeat his rivals within the decade. In 1206, there was a kuriltai, a meeting in which all Mongol khans meet. It was there that it was decided that Temujin become the khagan, or the supreme leader; he became known as Chinggis Khan. As he nited the Mongol tribes, they planned an attack on the world. Horses to Mongols were vital for battle; a young Mongol boy or girl learned how to ride a horse as soon as they could walk.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mongols have taken over city after city and killed so many innocent people, yet can they be barbaric for killing people. A reasonable answer would be,”Yes” as killing someone isn’t right. The mongols go overboard, to execute their rivals and dig them upside down.(Document 5) This doesn’t compare to what the us has done. The U.s Launched the “Little Boy” in 1945 killing 80,000 humans and later with radiation killed more.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Continuities In Eurasia

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When the Mongols took over and created a huge empire, they created a network that connected the Indian Ocean trade, Tran-Saharan trade and the Silk Road. The Mongol empire controlled the lands, allowing for protection and unity across trade routes.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were a nomadic civilization that never settled in one place. They lived in yurts or tents that could be easily packed up and moved. In the early 12th century, the Mongols were made up of many tribes who often fought and competed for land and livestock. In 1206, Genghis Khan united these tribes and the Mongols went on to become the most successful warriors in history. Although the Mongols brutally killed and murdered many people, they developed battle tactics, laws, and an acceptance of religion that demonstrated that was an advanced society.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Genghis Khan Dbq

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When we hear the name “Genghis Khan”, we tend to think of a merciless, brutal barbarian who raped and pillaged his way across Asia and Europe in the 12th and 13th centuries. We wouldn’t be entirely wrong to think of him that way, but there’s a softer, more diplomatic side to him that is often forgotten. Above all, Genghis Khan was a fair and honorable ruler. From his rise, to the height of his power, he stayed true to his own belief system and never allowed it to be compromised. He was relentless in battle, but he also brought unity and order to his country.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols had a very different approach to controlling their empire…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongol Empire is known for their barbaric ways like warfare and torture, which scared many people, they also made significant contributions to politics, economic development, and cultural diversity to many lands. Although the Mongols slaughtered entire cities and had rules that were barbaric, they were also in charge of trade routes, enforced important rules, had communication systems, and were religiously tolerant. The Mongols were somewhat barbaric because there were many parts of their civilization that were advanced. Documents 2,3,4,5 and 10 show how the Mongols were barbaric. In document two, it says that in battles, if one man ran away the whole group of men would be put to death.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq Essay

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ("A Tactic of Religious Tolerance"). In fact, clerics of many different faiths were even given tax benefits ("A Tactic of Religious Tolerance"). The Mongols were very benevolent and welcoming, seeing benefits within all religions and those who worshipped them (Nicholson 3,…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    With his extraordinary military accomplishments and leadership skills, Genghis Khan was a warrior and ruler who united all the nomadic tribes in the steppe of Mongolia and built the largest land empire in the world in the thirteenth century. He left a great legacy through his innovative ideas and laws whilst also promoting religious freedom, allowing an exchange of the global economy between Asia and Europe (Weatherford). However, with a belief that there should be only one ruler under the sky, Genghis Khan was unlikely to forgive those who refused to join forces with him and vanquished millions who wanted to create empires of their own. This presented an image of him and the Mongols as brutal savages who eliminated entire cultures, devastated…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongolian and Roman Empires were both vast and expansive empires. Both societies were able to accomplish tasks that no other empire had previously achieved. Although both empires were extremely successful in very similar ways, there were many differences between the two vast empires. This paper will explore both the similarities and differences between the two sprawling empires. Similarities…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays