Pros And Cons Of The Missouri Compromise

Improved Essays
Missouri Compromise
The Missouri compromise is a landmark compromise in American history. States At the time were generally between two different mindsets, being pro or anti slavery; and also the nation was generally equally divided in the even number of states with for or against slavery. However, when Missouri applied for admission to the nation, the balance was going to be shifted in favor of the south. So Henry Clay, a lawyer, politician, slave-owner, and a representative to the House from Kentucky, devised a compromise. The Missouri compromise in general terms stipulated that Missouri would be admitted to the nation as a slave state. However all land that was purchased in the Louisiana Purchase that lied north of 36o30’n would be free
…show more content…
Sandford, the Dred Scott decision is a landmark case in American history. The title plaintiff in the case is Dred Scott an enslaved African American, to a man who attempted to farm in Alabama. When his owner gave up farming the owner moved to St Louis Missouri where he sold Dred Scott to an Army Surgeon named Dr. John Emerson. Dr. Emerson then moved Scott to Illinois then later to Wisconsin territory, both of which are free states that do not permit slavery. Later Dr. Emerson died and his wife inherited his estate. So, Dred Scott using some money he had saved, attempted to buy his freedom; the widow refused, prompting Scott to seek legal …show more content…
Until this point war was almost a romantic portrayal. While the stakes were high during the revolutionary war, it was still a gentlemanly endeavor, sometimes which women and other civilians acting as spectators. Death tolls were relatively low, meaning less men left to fight the cause. The Civil War changed this for everyone. Men were gone and dying in the battle at a rate so quickly both the north and the south had to enact a draft to provide enough troops to continue the battle. This required the men to leave the home duties, like farming or working, to the women. Women were now the homestead provider, along with being the homemaker. Women worked at local jobs to be able to sustain. Eventually leading to women taking jobs as nurses for the military, the added medical care by trained people, led to higher mortality rate for the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Significance of the Missouri Compromise and the Monroe Doctrine The Missouri Compromise and the Monroe Doctrine were two of the most important documents written in the presidency of James Monroe (Shi 2016). Both were received much debate and mixed reviews, but have great significance in American History. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 came about as a result of fear in the South that states added from the western territories would be admitted as free states and cause an imbalance (Shi 2016). At the time, the states were equally divided, eleven slave states and eleven free states.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    history. The Dred Scott v. Sandford was probably the worst court decision ever decided by supreme court justices, as Dred Scott a former slave was taken to go live in Illinois (a free-state) for a year. Dred Scott along with his wife Harriet sued their owners for having slaves in a free-state and should be granted their freedom. This 11-year long struggle would soon surface into the Supreme Court, where by a majority margin, 7-2, Scott was sadly still a slave. In an attempt to end and solve the slavery problem once and for all, Supreme Court Justice Roger B. Taney quote "[Black people] Had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was a 36, 30 line that separated the free and slaves states; as a result Missouri became a slave…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Compromise consisted of votes in both houses “in proportion to the whole number of white and other free citizens and inhabitants of every age sex and condition, including those bound in servitude… and three fifths of all other persons… except Indians not paying taxes in each state” It still followed the bases of The Virginia Plan, but small states did not feel like it was fair. A New Jersey attorney general by the name of William Paterson proposed The New Jersey Plan as a substitute of The Virginia Plan. The plan proposed an equal amount of votes for all states just as said stated in the Articles of Confederation. They had already partook in plenty of nasty extensive debates over what they accepted or rejected about The Virginia Plan.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise of 1850 The “Compromise of 1850” was a resolution constructed by Henry Clay in an attempt to appease both Northerners and Southerners, in regards to if the new territorial expansions acquired from the war with Mexico and subsequent “Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo” in 1848, should allow slavery. The compromise allowed California to be a free state and gave New Mexico and Utah the policy of “Popular Sovereignty” or the ability for the people of the state to decide on slavery. Texas was given relief on 10 millions dollars worth of debt in the compromise for the re-allotment of a portion of it 's land to New Mexico. The compromise also outlawed slavery in Washington DC, as the spectacle was a national embarrassment.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise The 1800s were a dark time in our nation where disagreements over political power, and the conflict between free and slaves states occurred. There were several disputes and battles over land and the morality of slavery. Although a dark time in the United States, this was also a push for a better future. New ideas and policies circulated around this time period in an effort to seek compromise between the states and eventually end slavery.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard about the slave sued his owner’s widow for his freedom? Well, the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford is considered to be one of the most influential in legal history because the Supreme Court decided that the slaves are not defined as citizens of the United States, thus influencing their ability to sue in federal courts and this case eventually raised questions about slavery which led to the civil war. Dred Scott was a man who was once an African-American slave. He was sold in Missouri as a slave to an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, they later moved and lived in free states; Illinois and Wisconsin. Then, they moved back to Missouri, which is a slave state, but John Emerson passed away in 1846, so it is time he should become free.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was an African American man in the United States that sued for the freedom of himself, the freedom of his wife, and the freedom of his kids in the Dred Scott vs. Stanford case. Dred Scott believed that he and his wife should have been granted the privilege of becoming United States of America citizens because he and his wife had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory for four years. The U.S. Supreme Court voted against Dred Scott 7-2. With the disagreement of the Supreme Court, the Dred Scott Decision was brought up. The Dred Scott Decision was a decision in which free or slaved African-Americans were not allowed to be American citizens and the federal government had power to regulate slavery.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Civil War predictable? Did any events indefinitely cause the South to desire a split from the North? The North and the South had a growing tension between them for many reasons, and the northern abolitionists encouraged a Civil War through their actions of protest. Although many Americans were affected minimally by the changes of the nation, abolitionists inevitably foresaw a Civil War because the growing tensions between the North and the South became apparent in political and social changes, slavery issues, and the growing occurrence of rebellions. Political and social changes occurred in many ways, including The Second Great Awakening, Lincoln’s presidential election to office, the way the North and the South dealt with one another,…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Civil war was a battle fought between the United and Confederate states of America, launching in 1861. The Civil war initiated, due to the country not being able to come to a compromise on the issue of slavery, and politics. The Civil war is one of the most unique wars in the history of America. Some historians believe the war could be prevented while others believe it was bound to happen. However, I feel that in many cases the Civil war could have been avoided, but the ways things were being handled in the country it was destined to happen.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1800s tension was beginning to build between the north and south over the issue of slavery. Three major compromises helped contribute to these tensions and lead to eventual war. These are the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. These compromises and their effects had major consequences that shaped the nation of their time.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Missouri Compromise, all territory North of the 36˚ 30’ line would be admitted as…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although, the northern states had already abolished the slave trade, slave trades was still an ongoing battle in the southern states. The Revolution helped inspire the African Americans to fight for equality, freedom and independence from their owners. Slaves began to petition Congress for their freedom. Slaves pointed out the contradiction of the American ideal of liberty and equality and the reality of slavery. Slaves began to defend their freedom against their masters.…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A compromise is where when two sides have a disagreement and they are able to reach an agreement where both sides get a part of they want so they can be content. Compromises are a great way to resolve conflict although they do not work all the time. Before to the American Civil War occurred, many compromises were made to prevent the Civil War. However, the differences were far to great and compromises were not able to help prevent the civil war. One of the greatest reasons for this was slavery.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays