Insanity Defense Case Study

Improved Essays
4. It is hard to imagine that serial murderers do not effectively use the insanity defense. Please explain:
a) why isn 't it an effective defense?
- The insanity defense, is a defense by excuse in a criminal case, arguing that the defendant is not responsible for their actions due to a persistent psychiatric disease. According to Danny Cevallos, who is a CNN Legal Analyst stated that: the insanity defense is raised in less than 1% of felony cases, and it 's only successful in a fraction of those; moreover, defendants judged to have been legally insane at the time of the offense and subsequently found not guilty by reason of insanity are in almost all cases indefinitely committed to psychiatric hospitals for treatment. When it comes to legal
…show more content…
According to a video uploaded by aperi mentis and written by Steven Hassan stated that: Behavior Control constant reminding of the authority of the leader, obedience is the most important teaching just believing but don’ t question; Information Control deception is basic feature of recruitment it keeps potential members unaware of unusual group beliefs that would be distasteful at an earlier stage of indoctrination, important information which is available to the general public is withheld from current members and potential members; Thought Control the group has its own language and definitions which regulate how a person think, the change in definitions of significant words or doctrines keeps even the members from fully understanding their own beliefs; and Emotional Control fear is used to manipulate leaders create a false dichotomy between members and outsiders there is an outside enemy who is continually persecuting them, fear of punishment by the leaders if you are not “good enough” being “good enough” means following the ideology perfectly and is typically

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Defending Mr. Juneau Background Information On the day in question, Mr. Juneau was caught up in several mishaps but because of certain conditions, he shouldn’t be held liable for any of them. Three crimes committed, which included the following: • Possession of Nutria- an endangered species- with the intent to distribute; • Theft of gas; and • The murder of the neighbor. All three can be considered very serious offenses and therefore must be thoroughly reviewed so that it can be proven that Mr. Juneau isn’t guilty. Our defense will be that Mr. Juneau is not guilty due to diminished capacity.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some people are up against the concept of insanity defense where they believe everyone who commits crime must take the criminal responsibility for their deviant behavior. On the other hand, there are group of people who believe the NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system, in order to sustain the equality for mentally ill person. Thus, the question of whether NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system is not a black or white question where there is a clear answer. However, the truth is that the NCRMD defense has created in our criminal justice system with a good purpose of providing equal rights for the mentally disordered people. This criminal defense does not exists and works as the sink hole for the accused to easily escape or avoid his or her criminal responsibility.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The insanity defense has nothing to do with a defendants current mental status to be found not guilty by reason of insanity” According to Insanity Defense FAQs in paragraph two. A judge or jury will evaluate the defendant to determine their…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity(NGRI) Intro The criminal justice system is utilized to punish those who violate the laws and to protect the rights of the people who abide by the laws. However, there are instances where the criminal act of an individual are not punished through imprisonment. In these instances they individual may have a mental illness, which is causing them to not understand the consequences of their actions.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the legal standard to determine if a defendant is competent to stand trial? Competency to stand trial (CST) came about to light in the U.S. Supreme Court case Dusky v. United State which established that in order for a defendant to be tried that they have must have sufficient present ability to consult with their lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding and factual understanding of the proceedings against him (Dusky v. United States, 1960). Kruh and Grisso (2009) provide analysis of some of the terms that were used in the Dusky test: • Sufficient ability and reasonable understanding specify that CST does not require complete and fully unimpaired functioning, whereas reasonable implies to relativity to the context…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That’s not important in the jury room (Grishman 107)”. The insanity plea is used for a wide variety of cases. Part of the outcome is that the accused convicts of the cases believed that they were legally insane while committing the crime. Furthermore, a majority of the insanity pleas is rejected which makes it extremely rare to follow through. Through such cases, the insanity plea is commonly used as an excuse to prevent themselves from going to prison.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This verdict can often be mistaken for the defence of diminished responsibility / capacity despite there being many major differences between the two. Although both are there to be used by mentally ill defendants, reason of insanity is a full defense to a crime and diminished responsibility / capacity is not. Pleading not guilty by reason of insanity is essentially equivalent to pleading not guilty, diminished responsibility / capacity is however just the defendant pleading to a lesser crime, the fact they are mentally ill is used as a mitigating factor. The law presumes that every person has free will, is responsible for their actions and should therefore be punished in accordance with the seriousness of their crime.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first myth regarding the overuse of the insanity defense is derived from Television due to it being the only medium with consistent frequency. My father, who faces something similar, is a Detective with the Police specializing in their ID section working on forensic science for murders and robberies. The science surrounding fingerprints has been widely accepted with no two humans ever being recorded to share the same fingerprint. However, when the prosecution calls someone like my father to the stand, jurors are becoming less impressed. What’s known as the “CSI Effect” explains that due to increase amount of shows such as CSI, jurors expect to see more evidence as shown on TV.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity plea is a necessary modality for the legal system to possess; however there are many holes in the current defense that have caused criminals to find an escape, and because of this, there should be stricter stipulations in place on the…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state will imprison but also treat the defendant for their mental illness if they were declared “guilty but mentally ill”. There is an approval of the defense because the mentally ill defendant couldn’t understand that the criminal act they were committing was illegal. When the defendants are declared “not guilty by reason of insanity” then they will go free of prosecution and might be treated for their mental illness. People agree with the Insanity Defense because they think that the “insane” were not in the right mind at the time of the criminal action and could not decipher right from wrong or they didn’t know that their actions were criminal. These people think that the Insanity Defense is fair because, when the defendant is declared mentally insane than they may be incarcerated and treated; which will punish for the criminal act and treat them for their illness or they may only be treated which is believed to show that treatment is the goal and the way that is wanted to use to help the mentally ill instead of punishing them.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense Papers

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Morse and Richard, “some form of an insanity defense is a matter of fundamental fairness in a just society. It gives doctrinal expression to fundamental moral and legal principles that have been recognized by the common law for centuries and that the supreme court has repeatedly acknowledged (Morse, Richard, 488). Also, the insanity defense has been in the law since the 14th century and almost all state and federal law makers still agree on its importance today (Morse, Richard,…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jrank points out that many people have misconceptions about the insanity defense. One of these misconceptions is that it is used more often than it actually is. The defense is only attempted in about one percent of all criminal cases, and only twenty percent of these attempts actually win their cases (Jrank 1). One thing that people do not think about is that when a defendant pleads insanity they are admitting their guilt; because of this if they do not win their plea they will automatically be given a guilty verdict. They could also receive a more severe punishment for trying to go through with an insanity defense if they are found to be free of any type of mental illness.…

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity defense has been around for centuries and has always been the center of debate. According to Zachary D. Torry and Stephen B. Billick (2007), a crime must have two key attributes evil intent (mens rea)…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Definition Of Insanity

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The definition of insanity in the oxford dictionary states “The state of being seriously mentally ill; madness. Extreme foolishness or irrationality. ” Although this is defined as insanity I define insanity completely different from what society does. Insanity is very limited and we see this in many scenarios from movies to books which generate to our daily lives.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays