• Home Page
  • Pros And Cons Of The Holy Crusades

Pros And Cons Of The Holy Crusades

Improved Essays
Show More
The holy crusades of the late 10th to the 12th century, when you think of the crusades, what do you think? First before we start off the information and what was the crusades and what was the cause of it and what provided to it first take a moment to imagine your view of the crusaders during the time. Do you imagine a valiant and noble warrior coming in from his isolated and peaceful home that was summoned by the calling of the holy leader of the Catholic Church to participate in such a holy undertaking as he fends off the savage natives of the land in order to reclaim Jerusalem?
Or maybe do you think of a man who has lied to everyone he is able to and has committed many atrocities to both his own religion and to his soul, but he has been given the chance. No the thief to society has been given right to save not only himself, but his own immortal soul when he perishes if he were to participate in to join the arm that has been commended by the pope or his local lord. Or maybe do you instead envision a man armed with bot sword and mail and shield, undertaking a holy journey at first but has instead turned into a slaughter of children and woman fueled by zealous hatred for any who dare attempt to threaten the name of his god.
Nonetheless there are many views upon the crusades in this essay I will be naming many in the hopes of both the reader …show more content…
As lords or kings and ladies if judged before a priest or a cardinal can be judged and be put to the stake or to make it easier for people to understand. If they were not pious enough they can be judged and put onto the stake where they would be bound to it and the stake would be surrounded by flammable objects and it would be lit thus causing the purging of the man 's sins and giving him a chance when he was judged in the state of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Boys Crusades Analysis
    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Boys Crusades Analysis

    World War II is frequently labeled the ‘Good War,’ as it is characterized as one of the few wars in history that is justified by a majority of the world. Throughout the entirety of the war, the Allied forces worked to defeat the nefarious Axis powers. Paul Fussell’s book The Boys’ Crusades exhibits the truth about World War II, and it shows the harsh reality of combat. Young servicemen in America risked their lives in battle, and while they are respected for their work, few people understand the brutality they endure. The Boys’ Crusades argues that the brutality of war must be understood by the public, and as a result of the harshness of combat, World War II cannot be classified as the ‘Good War.’…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    God's Battalions: The Case For The Crusades By Rodney Stark
    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    God's Battalions: The Case For The Crusades By Rodney Stark

    Maren Hance Professor Rick Cherok History of Christianity September 20th, 2017 God's Battalions: The Case for the Crusades by Rodney Stark Book Review Rodney Stark, author of God’s Battalions: The Case for the Crusades, writes about how Crusaders, which were holy warriors, considered themselves to be true servants in God’s battalions. Author Rodney Stark, Professor of Social Sciences at Baylor University, clears up and explains many misunderstandings about the Crusades in this book. In his book, Stark examines each of the Crusades and address the myths presented in each one.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Were The Crusades Justified
    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Were The Crusades Justified

    The attempted justification of the Crusades comes down to islamophobia and ethnocentrism at its core. Defenders of the Crusades such as Professor Rodney Stark argue that the religiously-fueled wars were justified because the Christian (specifically Catholic) people of the time were “provoked” by the Islamic world. The publisher of God’s Battalions: A Case For the Crusades, just one of over two dozen of Stark’s books, reiterates his belief of this incitement stating, “the Crusades were precipitated by Islamic provocations, centuries of bloody attempts to colonize the West, and sudden attacks on Christian pilgrims and holy places” (“The Crusades Were Just a War- Interview With Rodney Stark”). He fails to see the irony in the fact that the in the Crusaders’ century-long attempt to recolonize in the Holy Land, they killed about one per cent of the population. (“‘The Crusades Were Great, Actually!’”)…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    First Crusades Pros And Cons
    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First Crusades Pros And Cons

    The First Crusade was a conflict between the Christians of Western Europe and the Muslims of Jerusalem. The Crusade was initiated in 1095 by Pope Urban II in response to the Byzantine emperor's call for help defending against the invading Seljuk Turks. On November 27, 1095, in Clermont, France, Pope Urban II called for a crusade both to help the Byzantines defend the Turks and to conquer Jerusalem. From the First Crusade, Europe made great economical gains. Europe benefited from the First Crusade more economically than religiously, which was not the goal of Pope Urban II.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analyzing The Pauper's Crusade
    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyzing The Pauper's Crusade

    While the aforesaid matters surrounding the Pauper’s Army incursion into the holy land were essentially brush stroked, there are two corresponding points to present that bind the historical events with the stated purpose of this evaluation. The first is the horrific, genocide-centered activities endeavored by Peter and Williams’ army prior to their departure and incursions into the lands held by Colomon and the Turks. The second is the lackluster manner by which they proceeded, and were summarily destroyed, resulting in the deaths of close to 20,000 ‘crusaders’. For all their religious fervor, the Pauper’s Crusade has been historically touted as the will of the people. The peasants and Christians who sought grander opportunities,…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The First Crusade: The Cause And Effects Of The First Crusades
    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The First Crusade: The Cause And Effects Of The First Crusades

    Throughout history there have been numerous wars started because of the need to help others from living under a supposed harsh regime and save them from being persecuted because of their race, religion or class. Many of these types of wars have been unsuccessful in achieving this goal and only one notable, historical crusade has done this and has succeeded, but at a price. There hasn’t been a movement more momentous than the First Crusade. The First Crusade was a pilgrimage turned military expedition to Jerusalem that was sponsored by Pope Urban II at the Council of Clement in November 1095 in the aspiration to set out from the west to the recover the holy city from the hands of the Muslims. The aim of this paper is to examine the causes…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Misconceptions About The Crusades
    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Misconceptions About The Crusades

    The Crusades are often one of the most romanticized periods by the common population due to popular films and shows depicting the holy war in a much more heroic light. With the mighty Christian army taking the fight to the savage Muslims who greedily talk their holy land of Jerusalem. Or in some other cases the barbaric Christian army that unprovoked attacks the wise peace loving Muslims. Thus, leading to a ton of misconceptions about the crusades, there are four myths that professor Crawford a Crusade historian believes are the most fundamentally wrong when thinking about the Crusades. They are: The Christians for without a just reason just attacked Muslims, The Crusades presented an opportunity for Christians to make copious amounts of money from Muslim lands, Crusaders did not actually believe in their religious reason to be there and instead had other plans, lastly the Crusades made Muslims despise Christians and want to hurt them.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Are The Crusades Relevant Today
    • 80 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Are The Crusades Relevant Today

    The Crusades are relevant today because they are the past of two great religions. They are also relevant today because we are in what i’m going to say is the 10th crusade one again history is going to repeat myself. Us the American people are at war with Muslims in the middle east and statistically speaking America is a Christian nation. Which means we are in another Crusade because it’s us Christians against Muslims but not all Muslims aren't bad.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The Positive And Negative Impact Of The Crusades
    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Positive And Negative Impact Of The Crusades

    In 1095-1291, the Crusades was a series of war between the Christians and the Muslims waging the power over the land of Jerusalem. Christians wants the land of Jerusalem because that land is a holy land. The Pope encouraged the Christians to join this huge war as a Crusader to take away the land of Jerusalem, from the Muslim people, who originally lived in. Both sides had their own holy sites so they both wants the land so they can pray freely. Therefore, Christians had to go to war with the Muslims by traveling from Europe to the land, Jerusalem.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Crusade: The Failure Of The First Crusades
    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Crusade: The Failure Of The First Crusades

    Before the First Crusades had started, the Byzantine Empire was having troubles protecting themselves from the Muslim Seljuk Turks. The Muslims were able to conquer some of the Byzantines land, as they were able to acquire Turkey and Armenia. As a result the Emperor Alexias went to ask Pope Urban the second for protection against the Muslims. Pope Urban looked at this as a way to gain land for the Christian faith and accepted, he gave a speech calling all Christians to join forces to claim Jerusalem and the Holy Land. To further motivate people the Pope promised any past sins would be cleansed if they were to join the crusades.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Crusades: Religion Vs. Religion
    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Crusades: Religion Vs. Religion

    Humanities Essay When the majority of people think about the Crusades they usually think of war and aggression, where Christians were inspired to go to war against Moslems to gain wealth and territory. While some crusaders may have had these dreams, this is not accurate. The written Hypothesis for this essay will be ‘The crusades were more about religion then religion than territory.’ There are three main reasons why the crusades were more about religion than territory.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Effects Of The First Crusades In Medieval Europe
    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Effects Of The First Crusades In Medieval Europe

    The First Crusade, also the most successful, began with the speech of Pope Urban II at Clermont on 27 November 1095, and was initially a response to the request for armed aid against the Turks made by the Byzantine Emperor Alexius I. However, its purpose quickly shifted and it in turn became the largest mass pilgrimage of the eleventh century, though it differed from all the others in once crucial respect, in that it was, at the same time, a war, one set against what was by some referred to as the ‘savagery of the Saracens’. Though there is a certain level of difficulty in defining what a crusade was in regards to the use of the word by the medieval people , a related question that gives a substantial amount of insight into what constituted a crusade involves the motivations that the knightly elite who answered Urban II’s call to arms had for taking the cross.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Positive Or Negative Causes Of The Crusades
    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Positive Or Negative Causes Of The Crusades

    The crusades were a bloody war between two religions the christians and the muslims in this case it was the christians that were attacking the Muslims. The first couple of crusades were of a religious war but after that it was just a way for people to get a license to kill. So were the crusades positive or negative. I think that the crusades were more negative than positive and the reasons are clear why they are They widened the gap between Muslims and christians along with even more hatred toward each other and the problem it started was that it made it a forever lasting waar between the two religions. The crusades had really pushed the christians and the muslims even farther apart as if they weren’t already far apart.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Underlying Cause Of The Crusades
    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Underlying Cause Of The Crusades

    Even though there is a difference of opinion as to why the Crusades began, some historians state that the cause of these massive military attacks launched by Western Europe on the vast Islamic territories for over a span of two hundred years, was mainly religion. This claim being supported more so by the Christian historians, a huge number of Muslim historians conclude that the underlying factor was after all gaining power, land and wealth on the part of the Christians. If one was to list down the causes of these Crusades, they could be broadly categorized into internal and external factors. Externally, the weakness of the Byzantine empire in the hands of the attacks made by the Saljukid turks after which three fourth of Minor Asia fell into…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of Anna Comnena's Alexiad
    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary Of Anna Comnena's Alexiad

    The extract from Anna Comnena’s ‘Alexiad’ is a valuable piece of primary evidence when studying the First Crusade, giving a thorough account of events from the Eastern Christian perspective. However, it can be argued that despite its detail, the passage may depict an inaccurate narrative of events. This is due to its adulation of Alexius and disparagement of the Franks. This suggests an underlying purpose to glorify the emperor. Therefore, the source is useful in discerning how the conquest was portrayed from the perspective of those from the Byzantine empire.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings