Pros And Cons Of The Holy Crusades

Improved Essays
The holy crusades of the late 10th to the 12th century, when you think of the crusades, what do you think? First before we start off the information and what was the crusades and what was the cause of it and what provided to it first take a moment to imagine your view of the crusaders during the time. Do you imagine a valiant and noble warrior coming in from his isolated and peaceful home that was summoned by the calling of the holy leader of the Catholic Church to participate in such a holy undertaking as he fends off the savage natives of the land in order to reclaim Jerusalem?
Or maybe do you think of a man who has lied to everyone he is able to and has committed many atrocities to both his own religion and to his soul, but he has been given the chance. No the thief to society has been given right to save not only himself, but his own immortal soul when he perishes if he were to participate in to join the arm that has been commended by the pope or his local lord. Or maybe do you instead envision a man armed with bot sword and mail and shield, undertaking a holy journey at first but has instead turned into a slaughter of children and woman fueled by zealous hatred for any who dare attempt to threaten the name of his god.
Nonetheless there are many views upon the crusades in this essay I will be naming many in the hopes of both the reader
…show more content…
As lords or kings and ladies if judged before a priest or a cardinal can be judged and be put to the stake or to make it easier for people to understand. If they were not pious enough they can be judged and put onto the stake where they would be bound to it and the stake would be surrounded by flammable objects and it would be lit thus causing the purging of the man 's sins and giving him a chance when he was judged in the state of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In order to survive, the soldiers endured savagery, which became a daunting task. When referring to World War II as the ‘Good War,’ it tends to soften the reality of combat. Fussell argues that war is always perilous and should not be taken lightly under any circumstance. Although the Allied forces should be commended for their bravery, war should still not be characterized as ‘Good.’ The bravery of the soldiers displayed in The Boys’ Crusades does not justify ‘Good’ or ‘Bad,’ it simply exhibits the harsh circumstances of World War II. The troops actions may have been necessary to defeat the Axis powers, but the necessity of war does not translate to a ‘Good…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Crusade, also the most successful, began with the speech of Pope Urban II at Clermont on 27 November 1095, and was initially a response to the request for armed aid against the Turks made by the Byzantine Emperor Alexius I. However, its purpose quickly shifted and it in turn became the largest mass pilgrimage of the eleventh century, though it differed from all the others in once crucial respect, in that it was, at the same time, a war, one set against what was by some referred to as the ‘savagery of the Saracens’.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Crusades are relevant today because they are the past of two great religions. They are also relevant today because we are in what i’m going to say is the 10th crusade one again history is going to repeat myself. Us the American people are at war with Muslims in the middle east and statistically speaking America is a Christian nation. Which means we are in another Crusade because it’s us Christians against Muslims but not all Muslims aren't bad.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Crusade was a conflict between the Christians of Western Europe and the Muslims of Jerusalem. The Crusade was initiated in 1095 by Pope Urban II in response to the Byzantine emperor's call for help defending against the invading Seljuk Turks. On November 27, 1095, in Clermont, France, Pope Urban II called for a crusade both to help the Byzantines defend the Turks and to conquer Jerusalem. From the First Crusade, Europe made great economical gains. Europe benefited from the First Crusade more economically than religiously, which was not the goal of Pope Urban II.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The extract from Anna Comnena’s ‘Alexiad’ is a valuable piece of primary evidence when studying the First Crusade, giving a thorough account of events from the Eastern Christian perspective. However, it can be argued that despite its detail, the passage may depict an inaccurate narrative of events. This is due to its adulation of Alexius and disparagement of the Franks. This suggests an underlying purpose to glorify the emperor. Therefore, the source is useful in discerning how the conquest was portrayed from the perspective of those from the Byzantine empire.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Would you believe me if I told you that there were a series of wars over a city 10s of thousands of years ago that are a main effect on our religion today? The crusades were a series of 9 holy wars which first started in the year 1095. The wars were over a holy city called Jerusalem. The wars were between the Christians and the Muslims. The Christians lost all of the wars to the Muslims except the first one. The Crusades were primarily caused by religious devotion because the Christians wanted to fight for their holy city Jerusalem and also for the rewards they would receive for fighting in the wars, while others will argue that the Crusades were primarily caused by the political and economic gain from the wars.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An aristocrat is one of the nobility categories. A society of people with noble birth. In this category, power is held most often as hereditary. The transition is from people of a family. They speak with authority which must not be underestimated by the society. They are esteemed indeed as the flag bearers of the people. Their voicing is an ingredient to the societal problems. Dissolver of even the most insoluble problems. Must the people not cast their confidence in them?…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crusading Warfare Summary

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Another reason why this article is in fact a scholarly monograph is that it is even written by a professor in history who is familiar with the content. This article mainly takes on the military approach, primarily expressing how violent the Medieval Times were “Gunpowder weapons ultimately blasting the lumbering, armor-clad soldier and his castle from the pages of history.” When looking at the text “Crusading Warfare and Its Adaptation to Eastern Conditions in the Twelfth Century” it was discovered that the article was categorised as a survey text genre. This can be determined by quotes in the article such as, “Empire mustered only about 15,000 between them at Bouvines in 1214.” and; “How was such a great force raised? At its core were 1,200 knights.” This article is based more around facts as well as highlights the occasional question within the article. This text was useful for providing the reader with background knowledge about each concept covered, as well as identified key roles that leaders played during the crusades such as Richard I and his unification of the third crusade, which in turn brought it success. However,…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The two sources I have chosen are Fulcher of Chartres’ account of Pope Urban II’s speech at the Council of Clermont in 1095, calling the Christians to crusade, and an extract from Arab politician and chronicler Ibn-al-Qalanisi’s account of the First Crusade, describing the behaviour of the Franks as they seize a town from the Muslims.…

    • 2406 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While the aforesaid matters surrounding the Pauper’s Army incursion into the holy land were essentially brush stroked, there are two corresponding points to present that bind the historical events with the stated purpose of this evaluation. The first is the horrific, genocide-centered activities endeavored by Peter and Williams’ army prior to their departure and incursions into the lands held by Colomon and the Turks. The second is the lackluster manner by which they proceeded, and were summarily destroyed, resulting in the deaths of close to 20,000 ‘crusaders’.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many historians consider the the time period of 1096 to 1487 a very important piece of history, most notably because of the Catholic crusades against Islam. A very important question can be detained from this; were the crusades a holy war? In some ways, the crusades were in fact a holy war. The were, after all, organized by the Holy Roman Catholic Church. The crusades were also wars of two religions, also making it a holy war. Lastly, they were “god 's orders” as claimed by the Catholics. Although many records of history lean towards the answer of “Can the crusades be considered a holy way” to be yes, some sources show that the crusades may not have been strictly religiously driven.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one was to list down the causes of these Crusades, they could be broadly categorized into internal and external factors. Externally, the weakness of the Byzantine empire in the hands of the attacks made by the Saljukid turks after which three fourth of Minor Asia fell into…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The crusades were a bloody war between two religions the christians and the muslims in this case it was the christians that were attacking the Muslims. The first couple of crusades were of a religious war but after that it was just a way for people to get a license to kill. So were the crusades positive or negative. I think that the crusades were more negative than positive and the reasons are clear why they are They widened the gap between Muslims and christians along with even more hatred toward each other and the problem it started was that it made it a forever lasting waar between the two religions.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Back in the 11th- 18 centuries 9 wars were fought between the 2 most popular religious, these wars are called the crusades. The impact of the crusades is more negative because it led to many bad reasons. Like most people that were innocent died or they got badly injured. Also, they left a hatred mark behind them wherever they went. They were extremely rude to each other and had no respect for eachother what-so-ever. Even after the crusades they were still attacking each other.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the twelfth and thirteen centuries, expeditions of Christian Europeans fought to conquer their Holy Land, otherwise known as the Crusades. The Holy Crusades were known to be some of the bloodiest battles fought for a lengthy time of two hundred years. At this time religion was becoming a big factor in the meaning of fighting and having a more intimate connection with God. In this paper the discussion of what kind of role religion played in the Crusades will be discussed. Between the clothing that they wore, the visions and signs that were seen, and the sermons that were taught, it all comes to play a part in the symbolic role of religion during the Crusades.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays