Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
The death penalty continues to be a controversial topic in our society that separates us into two major groups, for and against. It has been around since the beginning of America. Is it time for America to move on to something more reliable? The death penalty is an outdated method of discipline for those who won’t follow the law. In fact, in the last decade, seven out of the fifteen states have abolished the death penalty. Capital punishment is sharply declining. States are finally starting to realize the disadvantages. The death penalty should be banned from all 50 states because of the right that we as humans have: the right to live. In 1972, not only did the Court declare that Furman’s decision was unfair but he did not deserve death sentence and that the death penalty is violating the Eighth Amendment (which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment). The death penalty is unconstitutional. The death penalty was illegal nationwide. There were no executions during this time period. America made the right decision by deciding not to execute people. Four years later after Gregg v. Georgia case, the …show more content…
Why is that? Well due to the case being capital case prices could reach millions of dollars. More jury trials need to take place while dealing with capital punishment. You can’t sentence someone to death row without being sure that they committed the crime. Although mistakes do happen. So, if the death penalty is so expensive why do some states still practice it? This is a question that I still don’t have an answer to. There are no advantages to the death penalty. You can try to fight the argument that, “Well what if a criminal escape prison” if you were saying that in the 1900’s I could see your point. Nowadays’ security and cameras are better and more reliable. There is a little to no chance of a prisoner getting free. The government worked hard over the years to provide a safe and reliable prison

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    human history. The rise of death penalty executions in the United States against a backdrop of liberalism has triggered protests from various anti-capital punishment factions. Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Gregg V. Georgia, Illinois’s state legislature voted to reinstate capital punishment in 1974. The first execution was of Charles Walker in 1990, followed by eleven more executions until the final Illinois…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though the Eighth Amendment states that cruel and unusual punishment should not be allowed in the United Stated, we still have death penalties. Executing someone is considered cruel. The Supreme Court's decision in Furman v. Georgia in 1972, had invalidated most of the statutes allowing the death penalty in the interim. Following Furman, thirty-five states re-enacted the death penalty in some form.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Thoreau says, “It is not a man’s duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the eradication of any, even the most enormous wrong,” which sums up how the death penalty shouldn’t be allowed since no man should be tasked with the duty of taking the life of someone else do to their crimes and wrong doing; it’s hypocrisy (Thoreau). The death penalty is often thought to be cheaper than holding a prisoner for life, but that is false (OADP). It is believe that the state would save around 2.3 million dollars if they got rid of the death penalty, but the death penalty already causes around 9 million dollars a year (OADP). All of that money would be much better off helping the victims affected by the crimes of the criminals put on death row to give the victims counseling and assistance where needed. The death penalty also does not deter crime because states without the death penalty tend to have lower murder rates than neighboring states that do have the death penalty (OADP). The death penalty is only still living due to the misconceptions and can only be put away for good if the US citizens show their distaste for the barbaric punishment. Instead the US is spending millions of unnecessary dollars on executions and believing it deters crime which is also false (OADP). Reggie Clemons lost many years of his life due to the grueling system of death row and prison and the citizens of the US paid for it…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    nobody deserves to die for committing crime by mistake or without conscious, so the main point for human rights examinations must be that the death penalty is disproportionate with fundamental human rights standards."Man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love."(Martin Luther King). Capital punishment may have impact in expanding violence mentalities in a society which might increase the quantity of crimes rate in countries that practiced it. For example, if a society used to violence, they will feel it is justifiable and appropriate because it was done by the country. Abolishing death penalty can contribute to improve global image for such a powerful…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been a solution to crimes constantly. Justice systems around the world have chosen to take the life of a criminal instead of sentencing them to life in prison. Capital punishment should be abolished because the justice system should not have the authority to take a criminal’s life. According to capital punishment laws, it is not justified for a criminal to take a life, but it is acceptable for a member of the justice system to take that criminal’s life. The death penalty costs taxpayers more money than prison holdings, is religiously immoral, is an unscrupulous solution for homicide victims’ families, and puts innocents at risk. The only way to solve this problem, is for the United States of America to abolish…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dealing with the loss of a family member or loved one is already one difficult thing. However, it is as if a domino effect is taking place when the “universe” is disrupted by the troubles. From one person to another, how can we deal with the victims’ families when they’re in pain dealing with their loss? For example, taking the case of the parents of the victim, Faith Hathaway, I believe that they are better served by not given the possibility of the death penalty of the murderer. Simply because I find the “death penalty method” inhumane and ridiculous. It is as if you are punishing the murderer by murdering him. It is completely hypocritical when you are trying to “serve justice” by killing someone who killed someone else. “We kill people…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abolishing Death Penalty

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    We as a free society should spend more money bettering our community rather than on someone that’s more than likely is going to get executed. This society accepts such a cruel penalty, which allows the killing of another human to be seek. Since the penalty is legalized, we as a state is now listed under the same category as other states, that we judge for being so unhuman like and cruel. A study by Abdul-Jabarr, k (2015) states that states that are in the U.S. that doesn’t have the Death Penalty, have a lower homicide and murder rate than the others. Another huge issue that prosecutors have to live with is, what if it was a wrongful conviction? Prosecutors may sentence a wrongful convicted inmate to the Death Penalty, and time later may seek to evidence that proves that the inmate was innocent. So another innocent person dies, instead of having a life sentence until further notice with the case. Equality doesn’t stand a chance with our supposed to be justice system. The system is really sort of a shady business, and rules that we have to follow. Some argue against the fact of abolishing the Death Penalty, states that if the people know that there is a chance they would be placed on Death Row, less crimes would be the…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty should be abolished in the rest of the states that it remains legal in. “The death penalty is the ultimate irreversible denial of human rights.”(Insert Citation) The U.S.A is one of the only nine countries in the world to have carried out an execution every year, in the years 2009 and 2013. The other countries that still carry out the death penalty are Bangladesh, China, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Yemen. There are a few reasons as to why it should be abolished. The first reason would be race issues. The reason race is an important reason for it to be abolished is because the races can only recognize differences in their own race vs other races. The second reason as to why the death penalty should be abolished is due to mental illness. People with a mental illness who are put on death row are at a disadvantage because, at the time they committed the crime they aren’t always fully cognitive. The third reason as to why the death penalty should be abolished is because of DNA exonerations. With new technologies old death row inmates are being…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Florida, The Miami Herald reported in 1988 that the cost of the death penalty per execution was 3.2 million dollars verses the 600,000 for life imprisonment. In North Carolina, professors at Duke University reported in 1993 that the death penalty cost 2.16 million more per execution verses murder cases with life imprisonment (McLaughlin 689). In other research, it has been established that the modern day death penalty is more costly than the alternative punishment of life imprisonment without parole. The variations of these costs for capital punishment not only include cases in which the prisoner is executed, but also in those cases where the death penalty is pronounced but never end with an execution. These cases also include costs for the necessary appeals and trials to prove a prisoner guilty (Radelet and Borg 50). While the societal pendulum swings from keeping the death penalty to abolishing it, one thing is for certain; a light has been shined on the cost of the death penalty and the reflection of its effectiveness is shining through. These numbers are just a few statistics that show how much the death penalty is costing the hard working men and women of this…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The financial cost of the death penalty is one that is far greater than the cost of any other sentence. There are many things that drive the cost of the death penalty up that are not present in cases that end in a different sentence. Source A points out a few of the largest components to…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is in this context that we must consider whether the execution of these petitioners would violate the Eighth Amendment.” White practices the power of Judicial Review to dissect the case and concur with the majority. He states that there will be conflicts between the court and legislative and admits that this is one of those times; the court cannot deem the punishment given by the States valid and therefore, in all three cases, the sentence is unconstitutional. White, however, did not imply, like other fellow justices that the death penalty should always be considered…

    • 3946 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of today’s most popular controversial issues is the Death Penalty, also known as Capital Punishment. Capital Punishment is defined as the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. The different ways of executing always include an intolerable amount of pain or torture. The Death Penalty used to be quite favorable to citizens, seeming as people would gather out on the streets just to see a man being executed. This was until the 19th century when government officials decided to end public hangings and have them held only in prisons where the event was away from the direct public eye. In 1846, Michigan became the first state to get rid of the Death Penalty completely. In 1972, during a Georgia case, the Supreme Court said that Capital Punishment was unconstitutional due to the…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty today is perceived by many as an inhumane way of receiving punishment. A critic will not only argue the simple fact that the death penalty is a violation of one’s constitutional rights and only targeted for a particular social group, but also intended to affect innocent people. The death penalty doesn’t have to be the way it’s perceived to be today, for if it is dealt with accordingly, the benefits will outweigh the negative and would help the United States in the foreseeing future. That being said, instead of worrying about the damage the death penalty may cause, one should take into consideration the reasoning behind maintaining and implementing new procedures that would further enforce the penalty nationwide.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    History has documented a number of examples of this form of punishment being used to help deter crime and to protect society members as well as their beliefs. As society changes their opinion, focusing more on restorative programs rather than vengeance, it is contributing to the idea that capital punishment is obsolete. However, many states have disbanded the use of the death penalty not because they believed that it was inhumane, but because of the cost. Many states are faced with budget shortfalls and can not continue supporting the death penalty and pay for their annual state operations. Even though there are a number of moral debates surrounding this issue, the true deciding factor may not be based in ethics but rather in the costs associated with the…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same happens when a murderer goes free because of the lack of evidence we are spending millions on a process that is useless. Either you execute the person or you sentence him/her too life without parole and get on with the next case that takes up months. Some states use the death penalty for rape that is wasting resources for no reason what’s so ever. Some facts are: Executions are carried out at staggering cost to taxpayers., There is no credible evidence that capital punishment deters crime., Innocent people have been convicted and executed., Race plays a role in determining who lives and who dies., and the death penalty is applied at random. (Facts, 2013) You can read many articles on why the death penalty should or shouldn’t exist but we are not changing the subject when it comes too costs. In 2011 California spent $4 Billion for capital punishment that is twenty times more than what they spent on an inmate serving live without parole. Another, argument many supporters of the death penalty say that it will reduce crime because many people will think twice before murdering someone in cold…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays