Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

Decent Essays
Although, the death penalty doesn't exist for youth offenders, juveniles still receive a life sentence without parole. They deserve a chance for a better life, a chance to change. Sentencing them to life won't give them that opportunity. Therefore, just because a thirteen year old plan to murder his parents that doesn’t make him a ”serial killer “ (Jenkins 49). Not every kid who commits a crime will grow up to be a criminal. Researcher Paul Thompson found that there is a huge loss of brain tissue during the teens year he states that, “brain cells and connections are only being lost in areas controlling impulses, risk-taking, and self control” (Thompson 47). Teen brains aren't fully developed, with the right help and support, youth offenders

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The case of Atkins v. Virginia involved an 18-year old named Daryl Atkins. After a day of drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana with a friend, the two walked to a convenience store where they abducted an airman from Langley Air Force Base (Paust, 1998). The two men forced themselves into his pickup truck and drove him to an ATM teller where he was forced to withdraw money at gunpoint (Paust, 1998). Atkins and his accomplish then drove the airman to a remote area and shot him eight times. Atkins pleaded guilty to abduction and robbery of the young airman but pleaded not guilty to the murder (Paust, 1998).…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that those who committed a crime as a teen should be able to have parole. While I can understand the argument that teens who have murdered have stripped others of their life and should therefore be stripped of their own freedom and life, I lean more towards the science behind it all. Teens have highly underdeveloped brains. Their frontal lobes -in charge of decision making - are still growing. Thus, when faced with stressful situations and hormones rushing through the body, they may make atrocious decisions.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    nobody deserves to die for committing crime by mistake or without conscious, so the main point for human rights examinations must be that the death penalty is disproportionate with fundamental human rights standards. "Man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love."(Martin Luther King). Capital punishment may have impact in expanding violence mentalities in a society which might increase the quantity of crimes rate in countries that practiced it.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Crimes are typically committed by those who can be considered as an adult and know what they are doing at the moment. The result of the crime leads the criminals to having the death penalty or some other kind of punishment. However, once an adolescent commits a severe crime as an adult would, the ruling becomes difficult to decide upon. As a child commits a crime of any level, that child should not be tried as an adult but rather as a juvenile. Even though the juvenile commits such heinous act, others should know that children cannot function their brain properly just yet.…

    • 1972 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An article that advocates for this is “On Punishment and Teen Killers” by Jennifer Jenkins. Jenkins begins her article by retelling her past experience with a juvenile who murdered her pregnant younger sister. She uses her tragic experience to explain how the teen offender in her case was a serial killer in the making who was raised believing all his problems will be solved by his parents. Then she advocates for JLWOP (Juvenile Life without Parole) and explains that the media and people focus a majority of their attention on the juveniles while disregarding the victims of the crime. In her article, Jenkins states, “The juvenile death penalty was abolished here years ago and a life sentence still allows a great deal of good living to be done--even from behind bars--far more than these teen killers gave to our murdered loved ones” (Jenkins par.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sentencing juveniles to life in prison without the possibility of parole will only create real criminals. Why would juveniles proceed to redeem their actions after they have been sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole? Juveniles should be given the opportunity to a second chance, one truly believes with the proper resources that juveniles detention centers provide for the youths, that the juveniles have a great chance of prospering and learning from their impulsive actions. According to the article “At What Age Is The Brain Fully Developed?” by Mental Health Daily it states, “Although brain development is subject to significant individual variation, most experts suggest that the brain is fully developed by age 25” (“At…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A teen who commits the same crime as an adult should not be punished as an adult so justice can be suffered. In my opinion trying teens as adults is ineffective and puts them in danger. They can suffer psychological problems in prison with adults and they can also be abused. In my opinion there are better ways to help them and to serve justice for the people who suffered, but trying them as adults and putting them in prison with adults is not one of the logical options. Teens should not be tried as adults or put in a prison with adults because it doesn’t rehabilitate them in anyway, on the other hand it make them feel worse.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sentencing Hypocritical

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sentencing a juvenile life in prison without parole is depriving them of their rights and is clearly hypocritical. The minority who are pro sentencing them to life without parole don't take into consideration the possibility there is in enlightening these kids in becoming better citizens and learning from their mistakes. The reason why I consider the sentencing hypocritical is due to the way society treats juveniles and classifies them as “kids” until they commit a crime. I am in full agreement with the majority of Supreme Court ruling of abolishing mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit murder. Many who oppose my vision on the topic, use claims such as, “they’re old enough to know better” or “a crime is a crime no matter age,” but…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles should be punished as adults for violent crimes because justice is what is most important when it comes to our community being hurt. There are many reasons why juveniles should be punished such as a child’s brain development, social justice, and the amount of violence and effect on victims. People often misunderstand a child’s “undeveloped brain” with a decision they make. The truth is, if the undeveloped brain was to be on a child, the number of violence would increase. An underdeveloped brain is not the answer to violence.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is not to argue about the pros and cons of the death penalty and juveniles, but to give data it can inform the controversial argument to focus on the Death Penalty and Juveniles. This is important to the general area under study because it will give a clearer view on the opinions of each person on the death penalty and juveniles. The intent is to provide details of death penalty and juveniles, whereas to give an understanding of what causes these young offenders to commit a crime and why the law agrees with the death penalty on juveniles with no difference from the adults. Additional studies show the death penalty used with juveniles may perhaps appear to be civilized or not. Sentencing a juvenile to death could lead to asking questions for…

    • 2957 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life Without Parole

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mandatory Life Without Parole Juveniles, or someone under the age of 18, shouldn’t be given a sentence of mandatory life without parole but, they should be given quite a bit of time in prison. Although some may consider it cruel and unusual punishments because of the wording of the 8th Amendment, some juveniles are just natural born killers and deserve to be in prison for the rest of their life. A juvenile committing murder of the 1st degree, breaking the law knowing that what they were doing was wrong should be given large amount of time in prison but not life without parole. I believe by giving this person a large sentence of let’s say 10 to 20 years in prison, would help the families of…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Getting sentenced to life in prison is scary. We are used to sentencing adults to life in prison all the time that it's so normal to us. We really don't care about adults because they're adults and they knew what they were getting into by making the decisions they made. When adults get sentenced to life in prison usually because they committed a first or second degree murder. Now imagine being a 12 year old whose life is just begging…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should young adolescents be given a second chance after committing a heinous crime? Meaning, should teens who commit first or second degree murder receive a mandatory sentence of life without parole? No, I believe that teens should be given another chance depending on their case. The reason is because teens have underdeveloped brains compared to adults, according to experts. Another reason is because teens are also able to rehabilitate if given the chance to and if they really wanted to.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles and Life Sentences Do juveniles deserve mandatory life in prison for their crimes or should they have the opportunity to receive a second chance? In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life sentences for any crime are now illegal to give to juveniles meaning that juveniles are no longer allowed to serve mandatory life sentences in prison. This ruling is agreeable because juveniles are not fully developed, and it is unfair for juveniles to serve mandatory life sentences. Juveniles do not deserve life sentences because the teenage brain is not fully developed.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics