Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Amendment

The Government would have to pass a constitutional amendment before it can exercise a power to limit the freedom of speech of people, yes. The wording is clear, obvious & without ambiguity : "Congress shall make no law". When that stipulation was made part of the Constitution of the United States of America the power & force of that stipulation became higher than that of any congressional, executive, judicial body because it now exists as what I'll dub, a of 'a prirori' enactment.

I disagree with a lot of legal scholars when they state because the Supreme Court declares a law constitutional—such a law, or clarification to an ambiguity found within, having characteristics that its effect of enactment would be bestowing new abilities, or expand existing powers to either the executive, judicial, legislator & in doing so would fundamentally alter the Constitution of the United States of America—now that the legislation's & ability/power being in question before them made its way …show more content…
Let's now say, the executive branch felt that because of "C" it required a different method by which to enforce "C", "D2 "; but, "D2 " is a method that the Executive branch is employing that would deprive citizens of their freedom because they decided to say the word "Bang". The resultant effect of utilizing this method locks up hundreds of people because they take plea deals & after one hundred more a person(defendant) finally decides to go to trial. The defendant is found guilty, but, manages to preserve an objection over the methods utilized by the executive branch, thus, having the ability to appeal the ruling & subsequent incarceration(read denial of freedom & liberty, to say the least); the objection ought to be obvious, the executive branch's method effectively criminalizes speech, a violation of the first amendment, which