Pros And Cons Of The Constitution Dbq

Improved Essays
There are similarities between the two governments but the structure of the Constitution is better than its predecessor the Articles of Confederation. To support this claim, there are multiple forms of textual evidence that can be used.
To start, when the Constitution was first introduced as an improvement to the A.of C. two noteworthy rebellions are caused. (Doc. D and Doc. E.) The first is Shays Rebellion which was caused due to an regional economic depression that was intensified by taxes. These taxes were meant to help pay national debt. However it actually made the farmers (especially in New England) upset since their land was threatened to be taken away. So what did the congress do? They went and fixed the problem when writing/framing/justifying why they needed a new constitution. As for the second point,
…show more content…
of C.’s lack of authority (which is necessary when running a government to some degree) James Madison expresses that just because one certain state does not side with the majority it has delayed the reformation of a more efficient government. (Doc. A) This shows how incapable the A. of C. was at the time unlike the constitution which only requires a ⅔ vote to pass an amendment. Even Washington feels that a new constitution would be best. (Doc. F) The world sat and watched this new government forming in America, of course there were doubts from Europe but America, being the “teenager”, wanted to contradict their “Parent” nations and knew that if they worked hard enough they could prove the world wrong with their new Constitution that would last. The A. of C. was the item that caused Europe to doubt and for good reason too. Under its power our government could not even support itself because it lacked the power to tax without state consent. (Doc. C) To add to that Analogy the main reason they made the A. of C. so weak was because they feared becoming too much like their European “parents” (Just like any

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the active form of government in America by 1777, despite not being universally ratified until 1781. During the early years following the Revolutionary War, Hamilton recognized the budding defects in current governmental structure, most notably the fact that the federal government could not wrangle the various State Legislatures to move in unison on a path to preserve the Union and protect America’s newfound liberty. Hamilton could see the writing on the wall, The Articles had created a tenuous relationship between the the States and the National governments. Hamilton’s primary criticism of the Articles was that the system did not provide the necessary amount of power for the federal government to preserve and protect the Union and its interests. The federal government lacked autonomy to take action on issues that impacted multiple states, due to the limited powers of the executive branch and propensity of legislatures to debate actions to exhaustion without taking significant action.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 1780’s were a tough time for the America’s. America had recently declared itself independent from the British and were ending the Revolutionary War in the early 1780’s. The Articles of Confederation was drafted and put into effect in 1781. The Articles of Confederation was created due to the war going on because they needed unity between all the states in order to fend off the foreign forces. Upon the creation of the Articles of Confederation, there were many upsides to it but there were struggles with this type of weak government that led to its failure and the creation of a new document that we are all familiar with today, the Constitution.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1776 the Second Continental Congress began to draft the plans for the government of the new nation that would be formed after the colonies gained their independance. The plan that the congress created is called the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation created a confederal form of government, consisting of a loose union of 13 states, each with their own governments. However, despite the founder’s good intentions the government formed under the Articles of confederation is considered a failure, because it had minimal powers, did not have a chief executive or national court, and could not effectively raise funds for the national treasury. The biggest fear of the delegates at the Second Continental Congress was government overreach, and tyranny.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    In order to resolve the differences, delegates from the majority of the states met at the Annapolis Convention in 1786. But they were not able to reach any agreeable conclusion. That led them to decide to meet again later in Philadelphia. In second convention, delegates observed that there is urgent need to frame an entirely new constitution. A key issue of conflict was the structure of the new legislative branch.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution and Articles of Confederation are two legal documents that shaped the way that America is today. The Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation because it was not strong enough to govern the people of the United States Of America properly. The Constitution and the Articles of Confederation are alike because the Constitution was made to revise the Articles of Confederation during the Philadelphia Convention. The Articles of Confederation was written in 1781 but it lasted only 16 months, which proved to have many flaws.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Constitution is not just a piece of paper that tells us what we are and are not allowed to do, but it is a guideline for the government for the things they can and cannot do. The pros on having a constitution is that it gives a complete outline one the purpose and the roles of the U.S government and also protects the right of the people and the states by stating what the government can’t do so it protect everyone’s rights. Another pro on having the constitution is how it sets up a system of checks and balances between the three branches. This help prevent that no branches become too powerful. Lastly it gives a good balance between the rights of the states, and federal government.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Great Compromise Before the Great compromise, articles of confederation were weak, the states wanted representation and, there was no form of strong government. Federalism, the enlightenment, and natural rights were all ideas that shaped The great compromise. The Virginia plan and the New Jersey plan were presented in the constitutional convention which soon led to The great compromise. The great compromise between Virginia and New Jersey was one of the biggest compromises that impacted the articles of confederation and contributed in the making of the constitution, by developing the legislative structure, giving states the representation they wanted, and providing a stronger central government.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The question that I will be discussing today is the important differences between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution and why each document was approved at the time it was written. During the 1700s, the 13 colonies were under the rule of Great Britain, and a lot of people think that they just got fed up with it after a while, but there were reasons for the colonies declaring their independence and eventually, war. The main reason was that after the French and Indian War, Britain had a lot of war debt. King George III decided that the easiest way to pay back Britain’s debt was to heavily tax the colonies. They didn’t have a right to do this, but in their minds, they didn’t care.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Articles of Confederation didn’t seem to be making any positive progress. There was also no Chief Executive, which meant no Court system. A stronger central government was needed so that a new nation could be held together as a team. Since the former Constitution wasn’t working out, there was a decision to make up a new Constitution along with a particular challenge. The challenge…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitutional Convention was a mix of highly influential, and lesser so influential individuals. Less than a year after these individuals gathered in 1787 to suggest finite reforms to the Articles of Confederation a far more powerful national government would be replacing it (Paletz, Owen and Cook). The American Constitution and Bill of Rights established the foundations of American politics through initiating the first ten amendments which illustrate the civil liberties that human beings are entitled to, and as a result of the Constitutional Convention a document-the American Constitution-that advocated for a much more powerful government than the Articles of Confederation did was ratified. However, I would argue that we should treat…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Weakness of the Article of Confederation During the course of the Second Continental Congress in 1777, the Articles of Confederation were adopted for the proposal of a central institution. This meeting started in 1775, gathered many of the most brilliant minds of that period at Pennsylvania. Delegates were sent from the thirteen colonies to represent in the convention. The convention was a series of meeting, on the attempt to solve political and social issues. One of the major concern was the concept of distribution in power.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The new Constitution decided and ratified by a majority of these states of America must be brought forth to bring a need of orderly conduct and laws under a federal government to the people of this nation, a new framework of governance that must be a republican type of government for these states. The new system of governance must be able to provide a more effective means of management. The previous “Articles of the Confederation” did not arrange for an effective government for this young nation, it did not sustain an effective administration and encouraged disunity and must be replaced with a new government. The new format of the government under the Constitution is agreeable due to both the active participation and the limits given to each…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the long and dreadful American Revolution was over, it was a time to rejoice and celebrate, but, however, though the thirteen colonies were free from Britain’s tranny; it was also time to establish themselves as a respectable and suitable country. This required America to form a new government, which is known as the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of the Confederation were America’s first form of self-government. Though the articles of confederation were in some cases successful. The overall effectiveness was destratuos, many times the articles of confederation was tested through circumstances and failed.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree that the United States constitution is a less common model that we use today, although this may be true it is still the first written constitution and is part of our history. Adam Liptak brought out some interesting points, that in todays era the constitution is losing its prestige because a quarter century ago you could have found similarities between the constitution and other nation’s constitution but now everything does seem to be very different, it appears that is losing some but not all its appeal. In addition, Liptak also pointed out that the turn of the century was the beginning of a decline popularity that other nations saw in the U.S. constitution. It is a fact that the constitution of other worlds democracies is less similar…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays