Pros And Cons Of The Congressional Accountability Act Of 1995

Improved Essays
Also, some of the rights that the courts have made no one has ever voted on them in the legislature. More than that, some of their decisions have also contradicted other already existing federal and state laws. Also, some of the rights that the courts have made no one has ever voted on them in the legislature

Alternatives The Congressional Accountability Act of 1995, also referred to as the CAA, was supposed to help victims, but instead it ended up hurting many. People who would speak up against government officials would often not be able to press charges against the person who violated them. This was because they were of a lesser status, such as an intern, and therefore the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 did not fully apply to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Ryan Hare PUA 241 Professor Prato Checks and Balances In The United States Constitution The legislative branch is the Supreme court and House of representatives; they are responsible for checking on the executive branch. The legislative has the ability to impeach power in the House. The senate approves departmental appointments, treaties, and ambassadors. The legislative branch also has the power to declare war and has to approve the replacement of a Vice President.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What we call judicial review today came about in the case Marbury v. Madison (1803), when Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall assumed that power from the legislator. Marbury v Madison made it clear that the Supreme Court had claimed Judicial Supremacy in deciding unconstitutionality. In the book, Taking Away the Constitution From the Courts, author Mark Tushnet argues, “Doing away with judicial review would have one clear effect: It would return all constitutional decision-making to the people acting politically. It would make populist constitutional law the only constitutional law there is” (154).…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For most Americans, the Louisiana Purchase is regarded as one of the most influential treaties of our nation in expanding its borders and securing its status as a world powerhouse in political dominance. However, a significant yet otherwise subdued dilemma the Louisiana Purchase treaty caused was an unconstitutional expansion of federal powers, specifically with regards to the president. Robert Knowles argues that the assumed expansion of federal powers to include additions of states and integration into the union significantly hindered the balance between federal powers and state powers, granting the former much more importance in the “empire of liberty” model.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the founding fathers wrote the Constitution, they were outlining a plan for the governing of the nation and recording the principles according to which they wanted America to function. These were the principles that had first united the American colonies to fight against Britain, and still remain central to American identity today. However, in more specific matters, the founding fathers knew that what was right for America during the first years of its existence would not always be right for it. They knew that America would change politically, economically, and socially, and even welcomed development. Therefore, they took several measures to ensure that the government would be able to adapt to the future needs of Americans.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the Supreme Court didn't have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws, then who would? Without the supreme court, the other two branches will be overpowering. The United States can’t have a workable system of the government without the judicial branch. The Judicial branch act as a tiebreaker for the legislative branch and executive branch. And those three are the reason to prevent the government from overpower.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After the biggest terrorist attack in US history, a bill was passed which was a result of what happens when a government panicked. After 9/11, the US government was afraid an attack would happen again. So in a panic, the USA PATRIOT Act was passed in the Senate on October 25 2001, just 45 days after the attack with a vote of 98:1. The USA PATRIOT Act stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act. The purpose behind its name was that it deemed anyone who violated the PATRIOT Act unpatriotic or a traitor to the United States.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1788 the Federalist Papers were mostly written by Madison. The ideas shared in the Federalist Papers were relevant when Madison was alive, however, the problem is: are they still relevant and effective today. First governmental structure in USA is unique, no other government has the same system as this country. It is the only country that changed everything dealing with politics back in that decade, which shows how much the founding fathers were aware of the political issues. News in those days were spread quicker as they occurred but unfortunately most of it are not true or even reliable.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of the most important powers of congress is that of Congressional Oversight. While the public may only notice their congress when they are in session debating on important laws that is not the end of their duty as representatives of their constituencies. The members of congress have the responsibility to uphold and regulate different federal agencies (Halchin 2012). This is an important role when it comes to the checks and balance system. Basically, through congressional oversight, Congress can make sure that the laws that are passed are enacted and regulated.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Full Vindication of the Measures of Congress “A full vindication of the measures of Congress” is a letter written by Alexander Hamilton to the people of the colonies, part of which is addressed directly to the farmers. This was written mainly in response to the allegations, insults, and propaganda that the so-called “Farmer” had made against the actions of the first continental Congress in America through his letter that had been printed in the newspapers of the time. In his letter, Hamilton takes a systematic approach in responding to the accusations of the “Farmer” and defending the judgements and decisions of the Continental Congress by the use of logic, examples, and indisputable proof. With the Coercive Acts in place, which in the eyes…

    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By any means the Federal courts shouldn 't be able to interpret the U.S. Constitution, they should see it as a living document in which the meaning changes with the times. The courts shouldn 't interpreted the constitution in its original meaning. As the times change and things are viewed differently as they once were, people 's views on things change with the time. Why should we allow the courts to constitution when everyone sees it differently.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without these two Acts in place today in our country who knows what our privacy would be like when it comes to gaining access to records. These two Acts almost contradict one another because for The Freedom of Information Act it allows a much easier access to government information in executive branch agency records. This Act also goes beyond that and will give one permission to get access to veteran’s military information of veterans who were deceased on duty. The Privacy Act then makes it harder for an individual to obtain someone’s personal privacy records. This Act protects your privacy which can be great under certain circumstances.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Dbq Analysis

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although a majority of documents convey the impression, to be against the Supreme Court having the power to question the constitutionality of federal laws; but the amount of documents that agree, have more solid evidence in their argument. The Supreme Court should have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. Federalist No. 78, the Marbury v. Madison decision, Article III of the Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 are prime examples to prove that the judicial branch has the authority to do so. First of all, in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788; declares that, “[The] courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature...”(Doc D).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction This paper will define what statutory criminal law is on the state and federal levels of government. This paper will also look at the states authority to enact criminal laws by statute, and what the states limitations are in doing so. This paper will further explore the federal government’s authority to enact statutory criminal laws and what its limitations are. Lastly, this paper will describe what powers political subdivisions have in making statutory criminal laws.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The standard definition when most people think of accountability or being accountable is accepting responsibility. Though this is true, to me accountability means: letting your actions rise above your excuses, overcome your fear and accept responsibility for the consequences you are accountable for. Accountability is liberating and requires a willingness to answer questions from those people affected by your actions. Accountability means to have the ability to follow through with your commitments you make for yourself or for others. It means honoring, exceeding, and improving standards.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays