Pros And Cons Of The Clean Air Act

Over the past 40 years, the Clean Air Act and the Environmental Protection Agency have made several advances in helping reduce air pollution and creating a better nation. Recently, congress has attacked the Environmental Protection Agency, essential tying their hands, for personal gains. In The Clean Air Act, Congress found that the pollution caused by rapidly evolving Cities, industrial development, and motor vehichle use were creating a danger to public health and agriculture. The primary goal iof the Clean are act is to encourage action in seeking a solution. Part of that government action was implementing the environmental protection agency. The Clean Air Act has many advantages and could be the answer to problems caused by fossil fuels. Alternative energy sources are needed to lessen our dependency on fossil fuels and create cleaner air. The Clean Air Act incentives and limitations to help reduce the use of fossil fuels. The purpose of The Clean Air Act was to ensure a better environmental and financial future for America. Some enviornmental benefits were reducing demands for energy and conserving energy. Reducing our reliance on fossil fuels and creating more energy efficient motor vehichles would both reduce the use of fossil fuels and consumers cost in operating certain motor vehicles It was created to …show more content…
The letter essentially asked for congress to back down and allow the Enviornmental protection agency to do what is needed of them to regulate global warming emissions to ensure a better future. The letter included what The Environmental Protection agency has done in the past to help combat pollution, and what they could do in the future to continue to further benefit the environment. Scientist urged congress to “…oppose attacks on the Clean Air Act by respecting the scientific integrity of the EPA’s endangerment finding, and the agency’s authority